Re: ipmasqadm and firewall stuff

2002-09-11 Thread jeff
- Original Message - From: Jamin W.Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 3:56 PM Subject: Re: ipmasqadm and firewall stuff > On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:46:34 -0400 > "jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: ipmasqadm and firewall stuff

2002-09-11 Thread Jamin W . Collins
On Wed, 11 Sep 2002 15:46:34 -0400 "jeff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L 4.x.x.x 4000 -R 192.168.1.11 4000 > > now then... i had to manually put in my $EXTERNAL_INTERFACE (the > 4.x.x.x) because for some reason, ipmasqadm won't accept the variable. Hmmm, ipmasqadm ha

Re: ipmasqadm portfw

2002-02-06 Thread Paul Hampson
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 09:53:01AM +0100, Elm Gysel wrote: > I'm using kernel 2.2.14 and I have a problem with ipmasqadm portfw. > >From what I understand from searching mailing lists and so on I don't have > this aspect commpiled into my kernel. > This is the .config file : [snip] Have you set C

RE: ipmasqadm portfw

2002-01-14 Thread Jeremy L. Gaddis
remy L. Gaddis Subject: Re: ipmasqadm portfw And sometimes it's necessary to echo 1>/proc/sys/net/ip_forward On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 09:22:12PM -0500, Jeremy L. Gaddis wrote: > You need to say "Y"es to "Network Firewalls", "IP: firewalling", > "IP: masq

Re: ipmasqadm portfw

2001-09-25 Thread Tim Moss
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 04:15:07 -0500 "will trillich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i used to have this working like a champ, but now it folds its > arms and laughs and evil laugh-- > > we're trying to establish port forwarding so that a box internal > on our lan (192.168.1.2) can serve requests thro

RE: ipmasqadm portfw

2001-09-25 Thread NORMAND Jacques
Pehaps I will tell non-senses but potato run a 2.2 kernel (2.2.17 in your case). So the tool for that kind of tricks is ipchains, isn't it? ipmasqadm is for kernel serie 2.0 no ? hope it helps jacques -Message d'origine- De : will trillich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : mardi 25 sept

Re: ipmasqadm portfw and apache

2001-08-29 Thread Jason Majors
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 01:39:21PM -0700, Jason Majors scribbled... > Does anybody have experience with multiple VirtualHost entries? Or know > the > correct format? > I'm doing: > NameVirtualHost domainone > NameVirtualHost domaintwo > NameVirtualHost domainthree > > > ... > > >

Re: ipmasqadm portfw and apache

2001-08-29 Thread Jason Majors
Jason Majors wrote: >I'd like to forward all requests on port 80 thru my firewall, however, I >use >VirtualHosts under apache. >Is there a way to forward the port with the desired host name? >Or can I do it based on the hostname desired? (eg forward a request to >www.foo.com to port 81 and a requ

Re: ipmasqadm portfw and apache

2001-08-29 Thread Jason Majors
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 11:51:48AM -0700, Tim Moss scribbled... > Jason Majors wrote: > >I'd like to forward all requests on port 80 thru my firewall, however, I > >use > >VirtualHosts under apache. > >Is there a way to forward the port with the desired host name? > >Or can I do it based on the h

Re: ipmasqadm portfw and apache

2001-08-29 Thread Tim Moss
Jason Majors wrote: I'd like to forward all requests on port 80 thru my firewall, however, I use VirtualHosts under apache. Is there a way to forward the port with the desired host name? Or can I do it based on the hostname desired? (eg forward a request to www.foo.com to port 81 and a request to

Re: ipmasqadm

1999-12-10 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Fri, 10 Dec 1999 10:18:43 +0100, Onno wrote: >At 09:02 AM 12/9/99 -0800, Dave Wiard wrote: >>could somebody help me out with this one. i'm trying to masq my amd >>behind my alpha, but i only get the following error reported back upon >>trying to exec ipmasqadm: >> >>/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw

Re: ipmasqadm

1999-12-10 Thread Onno
At 09:02 AM 12/9/99 -0800, Dave Wiard wrote: >could somebody help me out with this one. i'm trying to masq my amd >behind my alpha, but i only get the following error reported back upon >trying to exec ipmasqadm: > >/usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L $SEEN_IP 4000 -R $HIDE_IP 4000 >portfw: se

Re: ipmasqadm

1999-12-06 Thread Onno
Where do you want to use it for ??? Regards, Onno At 11:38 PM 12/5/99 -0800, Dave Wiard wrote: >could somebody give me some pointers on how to use ipmasqadm? i don't >seem to have a man page for it and 'usage: ipmasqadm MODULE [opts] ' >doesn't help me much. i don't have a lot of experience wi

Re: ipmasqadm

1999-12-06 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999 23:38:48 -0800 (PST), Dave Wiard wrote: >could somebody give me some pointers on how to use ipmasqadm? i don't Use it e.g. to forward accesses to a port on your firewall to an internal machine like this: /usr/sbin/ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L $EXT_IP ssh -R $INT_HOST ssh T

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-05 Thread Bob Nielsen
Bill, Yes, the thread was cut a bit. I didn't see the part about 2.2.1, sorry. I am not running ppp on my machine with 2.2.2, but Documentation/Changes says: As of 2.1.102, the IP firewalling code has been replaced; ipfwadm will no longer work. You need to obtain "ipchains," available from

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-05 Thread wtopa
Subject: ipmasqadm question Date: Thu, Mar 04, 1999 at 01:25:07PM -0600 In reply to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Hello all, > > I seem to be lost on this issue, but here goes. I am running a mostly slink > system with a 2.2.1 kernel. Ho

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-05 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 19:52:34 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I checked with dselect and found I have ipmasq 3.3.1 installed already. >There is NO sign of ipmasqadm on my system anywhere. > >I have run 'find / -name ipmasqadm' with no hits. > >I do appreciate your help. Please don't stop now, but

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-05 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 20:24:38 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >I believe ipfwadm only works with kernels < 2.1.90 or so. The reading >I get from the kernel source with 2.2.1 is that ipmasqadm is required. You're right. ipfwadm is obsolete for 2.2.x kernels. Ralf -- Ralf G. R. Bergs * Welkenra

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-05 Thread whbell
Quoting Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Are you sure you don't mean ipfwadm (which is part of netbase)? > > Bob > > On Thu, 4 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I checked with dselect and found I have ipmasq 3.3.1 installed already. > > There is NO sign of ipmasqadm on my system anywher

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-05 Thread Bob Nielsen
Are you sure you don't mean ipfwadm (which is part of netbase)? Bob On Thu, 4 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I checked with dselect and found I have ipmasq 3.3.1 installed already. > There is NO sign of ipmasqadm on my system anywhere. > > I have run 'find / -name ipmasqadm' with no hits.

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-05 Thread whbell
Quoting "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 15:51:51 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >Please help me find this beast :-) > > I *think* it's > > http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary- > i386/net/ipmasq_3.3.1.deb > > Unfortunately I'm still

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-04 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 15:51:51 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Please help me find this beast :-) I *think* it's http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary- i386/net/ipmasq_3.3.1.deb Unfortunately I'm still under NT (:-) and I can't easily boot into the Debian system I have

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-04 Thread whbell
Quoting "Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 13:25:07 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >1- Am I on the right track with the ipmasqadm? > > Yes. YOu invoke it like this: > > ipmasqadm portfw ... > > >2- Is there a .deb out there for ipmasqadm? > > Yes. I'm pretty

Re: ipmasqadm question

1999-03-04 Thread Ralf G. R. Bergs
On Thu, 04 Mar 1999 13:25:07 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >1- Am I on the right track with the ipmasqadm? Yes. YOu invoke it like this: ipmasqadm portfw ... >2- Is there a .deb out there for ipmasqadm? Yes. I'm pretty sure that I did NOT compile it myself. I think I fetched the "unstable