Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

2002-12-20 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:31:20AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:42:36PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > > It Just Worked for me, I think. The only config options I know of is > > the one that lets you specify which remotes ports are to be considered > > IRC or FTP (I think it's

Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

2002-12-19 Thread Jamin W. Collins
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 10:22:52AM -0700, Jeremy Nickurak wrote: > Jabber's icq functionality comes from a component called an "Agent" That would be a "transport" or "gateway": http://www.jabber.org/admin/componentadminguide.html#gateways -- Jamin W. Collins -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [

Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

2002-12-19 Thread Derrick 'dman' Hudson
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:17:08AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: | On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:58:53PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: | > Yes, there is. iptables has modules for ftp (to support non-passive | > mode) and irc (to support dcc, etc). They're called | > ipt_{conntrack,nat}_{irc,ftp}, IIRC. | | D

Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

2002-12-19 Thread Jeremy Nickurak
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 05:17, Paul Johnson wrote: > Someone should go tell the netfilter folks about the jabber icq server > and the licq client sometime. Re: jabber icq server Link? As far as I'm aware, there is no such thing as a "jabber icq server". Jabber's icq functionality comes from a compon

Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

2002-12-19 Thread Jamin W. Collins
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 08:31:20AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:42:36PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > > Yes, but DCC connections in IRC don't work, I haven't tried this under iptables recently. > FTP works passive mode only With iptables there are connection tracking modu

Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

2002-12-19 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 11:42:36PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > It Just Worked for me, I think. The only config options I know of is > the one that lets you specify which remotes ports are to be considered > IRC or FTP (I think it's and 6667 and 21, by default). Does > masquerading work for you

RE: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

2002-12-19 Thread DEFFONTAINES Vincent
> -Original Message- > From: Paul Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday 19 December 2002 13:17 > To: debian-user List > Subject: Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:58:53PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > > Yes, there is. ip

Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

2002-12-19 Thread Rob Weir
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:17:08AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:58:53PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > > Yes, there is. iptables has modules for ftp (to support non-passive > > mode) and irc (to support dcc, etc). They're called > > ipt_{conntrack,nat}_{irc,ftp}, IIRC. > > D

Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

2002-12-19 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 04:58:53PM +1100, Rob Weir wrote: > Yes, there is. iptables has modules for ftp (to support non-passive > mode) and irc (to support dcc, etc). They're called > ipt_{conntrack,nat}_{irc,ftp}, IIRC. Does this work automagically once inserted, or is there some trick to iptab

Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

2002-12-19 Thread Rob Weir
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 07:35:11AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > Is there a way to allow protocols that may require connections to go > back to the client like ftp, irc and icq to do so while doing IP > Masquerading? I'm open to do this with a 2.2 or 2.4 kernel, either > way works for me. Yes, the

Re: ipmasq with ICQ, IRC

2002-12-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Is there a way to allow protocols that may require connections to go >back to the client like ftp, irc and icq to do so while doing IP >Masquerading? I'm open to do this with a 2.2 or 2.4 kernel, either >w