- Forwarded message from Oswald Buddenhagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> a connection is something open, it needs (at least) two (active) ends.
> otherwise it is only a route. a masq rule is (kind of) a route.
>>> Thank you for helping clarify the distinction.
> no problem. sorry for the ha
> Hmm; the actual emphasis lies on "connections which are currently
> masqueraded". The word "open" was filled-in for you by your
> already-existing understanding of what's going on; it's not present in the
> text I was poring over and that you've quoted.
>
> My understanding had reached this f
From: Oswald Buddenhagen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> (Now I'm trying to figure out what's made the difference -- why it is
>> that previously I was seeing specific entries with 'ipchains -M -L'
>> and now I'm not...possibly something's been updated, dunno; as long
>> as things keep working, I'm planni
> > But still when I do "ipchains -M -L" I don't get anything.
> >
> > Any ideas?
>
> I'm now experiencing the same thing. :-) But as long as I can see the MASQ
> entry in the output from "ipchains -L", things appear to be working.
>
> (Now I'm trying to figure out what's made the difference --
On 01-Apr-2000 matt garman wrote:
> But still when I do "ipchains -M -L" I don't get anything.
>
> Any ideas?
I'm now experiencing the same thing. :-) But as long as I can see the MASQ
entry in the output from "ipchains -L", things appear to be working.
(Now I'm trying to figure out what's ma
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 09:47:51AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:16:16AM +1000, Peter Ross wrote:
> > Install the `ipmasq' package, it will automatically set up IP
> > Masquerading for you providing the IP addresses you have chosen are
> > private ie 10.x.x.x or 192.168
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 12:14:52PM -0600, matt garman wrote:
> I executed "ipchains -P forward ACCEPT" for the three default chains
> (forward, output, intput), so that I could in fact have "(policy ACCEPT)"
> for all three chains.
> ...
Problem solved, all of my roommates and I are connected!
Th
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:02:15PM -0500, Jeff Gordon wrote:
> ...and you should see "(policy ACCEPT)" for the three 'chains'. If
> that's okay, do:
>
> ipchains -M -L
>
> ...and see if the MASQ entry is still present -- dunno why yet, but
> we're experiencing that entry's disappearance from tim
arman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jeff Gordon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 01, 2000 6:47 AM
Subject: Re: ipmasq and howto
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 07:52:01AM -0500, Jeff Gordon wrote:
> > The answer seems to be, "Yes...sort of." :-) See if this helps:
&
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000 14:47:20 -0600, matt garman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for all the help! But unfortunately it's not working.
You're probably really, really close to succeeding. :-)
It -sounds- like all the bits are working, but 'forwarding' is not fully
activated; that your room
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 07:52:01AM -0500, Jeff Gordon wrote:
> The answer seems to be, "Yes...sort of." :-) See if this helps:
> ...
Thanks for all the help! But unfortunately it's not working.
I double checked the IP-Masquerading howto to make sure I have all the
necessary kernel components co
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:16:16AM +1000, Peter Ross wrote:
> Install the `ipmasq' package, it will automatically set up IP
> Masquerading for you providing the IP addresses you have chosen are
> private ie 10.x.x.x or 192.168.0.x or 172.15.x.x where x can be
> anything.
To be correct, the "privat
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 03:14:57PM +0700, Oki DZ wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, matt garman wrote:
> > In other words, having installed ipmasq and other related Debian packages,
> > do I still need to follow all the steps in the howto?
>
> Yes sure, no package installer would know the setup o
I just installed ipmasq package on the stock potato kernel.
After this I needed to take out a line from /etc/init.d/network which set
a default route to eth0.
After it everything went flawlessly.
Robert Varga
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Jeff Gordon wrote:
> Hi, Matt --
>
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:38
Hi, Matt --
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:38:05 -0600, matt garman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps I'm not making myself clear. I just want to get IP Masquerading
> working on my Linux box. So I read the IP Masquerading howto. But I
> believe some steps outlined in the howto would be redundant g
On Thu, 30 Mar 2000, matt garman wrote:
> In other words, having installed ipmasq and other related Debian packages,
> do I still need to follow all the steps in the howto?
Yes sure, no package installer would know the setup of your firewall (IP
numbers, network devices, etc.)
Oki
Install the `ipmasq' package, it will automatically set up IP
Masquerading for you providing the IP addresses you have chosen are
private ie 10.x.x.x or 192.168.0.x or 172.15.x.x where x can be
anything.
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 12:52:23PM -0600, matt garman wrote:
>
> I read the IP-Masquerading h
On 30-Mar-2000 23:58:12 indra wardhana wrote:
> ipchains and ipfwadm is the same function
> if u are using linux kernel 2.0.x u will using ipfwadm (because linux kernel
> 2.0.x doesn't support ipchains)
> if u are using linux kernel 2.2.x u will using ipchains (ipfwadm still work
> in linux kernel
u are using linux kernel 2.4.x u will using nat
-Original Message-
From: matt garman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian User's List
Date: Friday, 31 March, 2000 06:50
Subject: Re: ipmasq and howto
>On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 11:24:54PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
>> Well, once
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 11:24:54PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> Well, once you know it is , you can look in /usr/doc/
> for documentation that ought to explain this. If it's not there,
> complain to the maintainer (@packages.debian.org), because that
> sort of thing ought to
Perhaps I'm not maki
30/03/00 16:14:04, matt garman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 10:15:38PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
>> >I read the IP-Masquerading howto and I am confused as to how it relates to
>> >Debian. For example, it says I need to get the ipchains and ipfwadm
>> >packages. I
matt garman wrote:
>On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 10:15:38PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
>> ipchains is in the netbase package
...
>Ah, yes... But in my question what I meant was, In all the steps outlined
>in the IP-Masquerading howto, where does Debian leave off, and where do I
>need to pic
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 10:15:38PM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> >I read the IP-Masquerading howto and I am confused as to how it relates to
> >Debian. For example, it says I need to get the ipchains and ipfwadm
> >packages. I couldn't find these via a search in dselect. But I have the
>
matt garman wrote:
>
>I read the IP-Masquerading howto and I am confused as to how it relates to
>Debian. For example, it says I need to get the ipchains and ipfwadm
>packages. I couldn't find these via a search in dselect. But I have the
>"ipchains" and "ipfwadm" binaries on my system
24 matches
Mail list logo
