Sorry, had to run off for a couple of days.
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:51:37 -0700
"Monique Y. Herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 2004-03-12, Chris Metzler penned:
>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:32:36 -0600
>> John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Now do likewise for the general media. The d
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 02:24:34PM -0500, Chris Metzler wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:32:36 -0600
> John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Chris Metzler writes:
> > > Pick a specific topic that you're *expert* in, compared to the general
> > > /. population. Find in the archives and read
On 2004-03-12, Chris Metzler penned:
>
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:32:36 -0600
> John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Chris Metzler writes:
>> > Pick a specific topic that you're *expert* in, compared to the general
>> > /. population. Find in the archives and read a discussion on that
>> > t
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 12:32:36 -0600
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Chris Metzler writes:
> > Pick a specific topic that you're *expert* in, compared to the general
> > /. population. Find in the archives and read a discussion on that
> > topic. Look at the +3, +4 and +5 posts only. Do
On 2004-03-12, John Hasler penned:
> Chris Metzler writes:
>> Pick a specific topic that you're *expert* in, compared to the
>> general /. population. Find in the archives and read a discussion on
>> that topic. Look at the +3, +4 and +5 posts only. Do you really
>> find them that impressive? M
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 12:32:36PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Chris Metzler writes:
> > Pick a specific topic that you're *expert* in, compared to the general
> > /. population. Find in the archives and read a discussion on that topic.
> > Look at the +3, +4 and +5 posts only. Do you really find
Chris Metzler writes:
> Pick a specific topic that you're *expert* in, compared to the general
> /. population. Find in the archives and read a discussion on that topic.
> Look at the +3, +4 and +5 posts only. Do you really find them that
> impressive? My bet is that the answer will be "no."
No
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004 09:40:37 -0700
"Monique Y. Herman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are you taking advantage of the filtering features? I read slashdot at
> +3, waiting till there's a decent body of posts, and it's not nearly as
> bad as you describe above. Blatant inaccuracies are often ident
On 2004-03-12, Chris Metzler penned:
>
> 30% are trolls;
> 30% are expressions of opinion without substantive explanation/
> justification (the equivalent of "Me too!" or "Not me!");
> 30% are "explanations" of configuration procedures, or software
> capabilities, or scientific issues,
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 23:15:23 -0600
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marc Wilson wrote:
> >On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:46:12AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
>>
>>> Don't you read Slashdot?
>>>
>>
>> I really hope there's a smiley that's supposed to be there that I just
>> can't see.
>>
>> Why wou
Marc Wilson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:46:12AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
Don't you read Slashdot?
I really hope there's a smiley that's supposed to be there that I just
can't see.
Why would anyone *ever* consider SlashCrap any sort of news source worth
paying attention to? It's an em
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:46:12AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> Don't you read Slashdot?
I really hope there's a smiley that's supposed to be there that I just
can't see.
Why would anyone *ever* consider SlashCrap any sort of news source worth
paying attention to? It's an embarassment to the FOSS c
Kent West wrote:
jack kinnon wrote:
hi folks,
Thanks for the info on installation. Am considering using the
'minimal CD' option. It still requires 100+ MB of download. Seems
rather big. What's in there?
From
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/doc/INST
On Wed, Mar 10, 2004 at 10:46:12AM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> Don't you read Slashdot?
Good grief, what's the point of reading Slashdot? :) It's such a
cesspit, articles and comments both ...
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
jack kinnon wrote:
hi folks,
Thanks for the info on installation. Am considering using the
'minimal CD' option. It still requires 100+ MB of download. Seems
rather big. What's in there?
From
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/doc/INSTALLATION-HOWTO
I ge
15 matches
Mail list logo
