Hi Daniel and everybody,
It's a reply for the Daniel's message
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2016/10/msg00481.html
I encounter the topic sometimes, how about imapsync back into Debian?
As the author of imapsync, my quick answer is yes, I would be pleased
to see imapsync brought back into
Florian Pelgrim writes:
>
> I wanted to start now a rant against Cyrus but holy shit... They have
> got a new website and it all looks modern... Maybe I should take a look
> on it again.
>
I don't care if it *looks* modern, as long as it has more information
than the old site(s); I quite like Cyru
Hi,
> It is a server with Squeeze and
> they do not even bother to use the LTS repositories, so more than two
> years ago that server is without security updates.
Problems I defently see to much in the web... :(
> So that is a not minor matter that we have to consider to be sure that
> this site
Daniel Bareiro:
> On 14/10/16 16:30, Jochen Spieker wrote:
>
>>> I am planning to migrate about 200 e-mail accounts from a mail server
>>> using Dovecot to a mail server running Cyrus.
>
>> Sounds weird! I though most people migrate _to_ Dovecot nowadays (if
>> they haven't already). Care to elab
Hi, Jochen.
On 14/10/16 16:30, Jochen Spieker wrote:
>> I am planning to migrate about 200 e-mail accounts from a mail server
>> using Dovecot to a mail server running Cyrus.
> Sounds weird! I though most people migrate _to_ Dovecot nowadays (if
> they haven't already). Care to elaborate the rea
Daniel Bareiro:
>
> I am planning to migrate about 200 e-mail accounts from a mail server
> using Dovecot to a mail server running Cyrus.
Sounds weird! I though most people migrate _to_ Dovecot nowadays (if
they haven't already). Care to elaborate the reasons? I don't want to
discuss it, I am jus
Hi, Henrique.
On 14/10/16 11:38, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
>> For the current license, this could make it a candidate for
>> incorporation in the Debian repositories again?
> We don't usually distribute software against upstream wishes. I sup
On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> For the current license, this could make it a candidate for
> incorporation in the Debian repositories again?
We don't usually distribute software against upstream wishes. I suppose
there are exceptions, but IMHO there aren't any exceendingly good
reas
8 matches
Mail list logo
