Re: ide-scsi emulation deprecated

2004-08-27 Thread matt zagrabelny
> > > Indeed. In Unix, everything's a file. > except for interfaces. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ide-scsi emulation deprecated

2004-08-27 Thread John Summerfield
Roel Schroeven wrote: Joerg Schilling, the cdrecord author, argues that cdrecord uses SCSI commands to do its work, so everything should work according to the SCSI standard. That means, amongst others, addressing devices by bus,target,lun. The kernel developers argue that in Linux, as in Unix,

Re: ide-scsi emulation deprecated

2004-08-27 Thread Roel Schroeven
Jim McCloskey wrote: |> > should work, but it is better to write |> > |> > cdrecord dev=ATAPI:0,1,0 etc |> |> why is it better than dev=/dev/hdc? There was a huge to-do about this on the kernel mailing list not so long ago (between the kernel developers and the author of cdrecord)[1]. The conse

Re: ide-scsi emulation deprecated

2004-08-27 Thread Andrew Schulman
> There was a huge to-do about this on the kernel mailing list not so > long ago Boy, you're not kidding. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ide-scsi emulation deprecated

2004-08-27 Thread Jim McCloskey
|> > should work, but it is better to write |> > |> > cdrecord dev=ATAPI:0,1,0 etc |> |> why is it better than dev=/dev/hdc? There was a huge to-do about this on the kernel mailing list not so long ago (between the kernel developers and the author of cdrecord)[1]. The consensus among the kernel

Re: ide-scsi emulation deprecated

2004-08-26 Thread csj
On 26. August 2004 at 1:26PM -0400, Antonio Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 12:52:05AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: > > Rob Benton wrote: > > > > >OK I may be slow, but I just noticed in my boot messages the other day > > >that in the 2.6 kernels ide-scsi emulati

Re: ide-scsi emulation deprecated

2004-08-26 Thread Eric
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:40:06 +0200, Rob Benton wrote: > OK I may be slow, but I just noticed in my boot messages the other day > that in the 2.6 kernels ide-scsi emulation is deprecated. Unfortunately > the version of cdrecord I have (from testing) doesn't agree. Has > anybody had any success

Re: ide-scsi emulation deprecated

2004-08-26 Thread matt zagrabelny
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 12:26, Antonio Rodriguez wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 12:52:05AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: > > Rob Benton wrote: > > > > >OK I may be slow, but I just noticed in my boot messages the other day > > >that in the 2.6 kernels ide-scsi emulation is deprecated. > > >Unf

Re: ide-scsi emulation deprecated

2004-08-26 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 12:52:05AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: > Rob Benton wrote: > > >OK I may be slow, but I just noticed in my boot messages the other day > >that in the 2.6 kernels ide-scsi emulation is deprecated. > >Unfortunately the version of cdrecord I have (from testing) doesn't

Re: ide-scsi emulation deprecated

2004-08-26 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Rob Benton: > OK I may be slow, but I just noticed in my boot messages the other day > that in the 2.6 kernels ide-scsi emulation is deprecated. Unfortunately > the version of cdrecord I have (from testing) doesn't agree. Has > anybody had any success getting cdrecord to work wit

Re: ide-scsi emulation deprecated

2004-08-26 Thread John Summerfield
Rob Benton wrote: OK I may be slow, but I just noticed in my boot messages the other day that in the 2.6 kernels ide-scsi emulation is deprecated. Unfortunately the version of cdrecord I have (from testing) doesn't agree. Has anybody had any success getting cdrecord to work with an IDE target