On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 05:26:12PM -0500, Daniel B. wrote:
> Chris Bannister wrote:
> >On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:42:22AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >>Raju's point about employment with capitalone is entirely
> >>different. CapitalOne is not (at least ostensibly) a web content
> >>compan
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 11:10 -0500, Daniel Barclay wrote:
> Greg Folkert wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:26 -0500, Daniel B. wrote:
> >> Chris Bannister wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:42:22AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> Raju's point about employment with capitalone is ent
Greg Folkert wrote:
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:28 -0500, Daniel Barclay wrote:
H.S. wrote:
The website ... suggests I either download Firefox or
IE 6 or 7, all for Windows. They do not support any non-Windows browser
at all!
Firefox runs on Linux. Or do you mean that website says or implies
Greg Folkert wrote:
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:26 -0500, Daniel B. wrote:
Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:42:22AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
Raju's point about employment with capitalone is entirely
different. CapitalOne is not (at least ostensibly) a web content
compa
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:28 -0500, Daniel Barclay wrote:
> H.S. wrote:
>
> > The website ... suggests I either download Firefox or
> > IE 6 or 7, all for Windows. They do not support any non-Windows browser
> > at all!
>
> Firefox runs on Linux. Or do you mean that website says or implies
> t
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:26 -0500, Daniel B. wrote:
> Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:42:22AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >> Raju's point about employment with capitalone is entirely
> >> different. CapitalOne is not (at least ostensibly) a web content
> >> company.
Chris Bannister wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:42:22AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
Raju's point about employment with capitalone is entirely
different. CapitalOne is not (at least ostensibly) a web content
company. As such they can (IMO) be somehwat forgriven for having
non-compliant
H.S. wrote:
The website ... suggests I either download Firefox or
IE 6 or 7, all for Windows. They do not support any non-Windows browser
at all!
Firefox runs on Linux. Or do you mean that website says or implies
that it only works with the Windows version of Firefox (and not
others, e.g.,
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 11:42:22AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> Raju's point about employment with capitalone is entirely
> different. CapitalOne is not (at least ostensibly) a web content
> company. As such they can (IMO) be somehwat forgriven for having
> non-compliant stuff on the web.
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 03:03:13PM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 10:39:51AM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
Ottavio Caruso wrote:
--- Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAI
Doug writes:
> There's nothing wrong with not being employed by a company because you
> don't agree with the company. In some professions, its a professional
> duty to not work for such a company. It follows that if there are _no_
> employers with whom you agree then there is a mismatch between y
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 03:03:13PM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> >Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >>On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 10:39:51AM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
> >>>Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> --- Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >In such a case, shoul
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 10:39:51AM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
Ottavio Caruso wrote:
--- Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In such a case, should I tell my friend "dont apply for jobs with
capitalone as they use a website which
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 10:39:51AM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
Ottavio Caruso wrote:
--- Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In such a case, should I tell my friend "dont apply for jobs with
capitalone
as they use a website which is not compatible with
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 12:14:04PM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 09:52:44PM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> > In such a case, should I tell my friend "dont apply for jobs with
> > capitalone
> > as they use a website which is not compatible with iceweasel?" or should
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 02:28:51AM -0500, H.S. wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 07:58:45PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> >>H.S. writes:
> >>>IIRC, it used to work before. Maybe the browser identification string is
> >>>causing the problem!? Any suggestions?
> >>Iceweasel i
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 05:20:59AM -0800, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> --- Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > In such a case, should I tell my friend "dont apply for jobs with
> > capitalone
> > as they use a website which is not compatible with iceweasel?"
>
> Yes, you should!
On Sun, Feb 04, 2007 at 10:39:51AM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
> Ottavio Caruso wrote:
> >--- Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>In such a case, should I tell my friend "dont apply for jobs with
> >>capitalone
> >>as they use a website which is not compatible with iceweasel?
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 09:52:44PM -0500, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
> In such a case, should I tell my friend "dont apply for jobs with capitalone
> as they use a website which is not compatible with iceweasel?" or should I
> tell him "Just go to a windows machine and send your application?"
No
On 2/4/07, Michael Pobega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you keep a company like that going by pumping new blood into it
you'll just end up seeing more companies like them, and before you know
it there will be no more standard compliant business sites anywhere on
the internet.
For me changing Us
John Hasler wrote:
H.S. writes:
IIRC, it used to work before. Maybe the browser identification string is
causing the problem!? Any suggestions?
Iceweasel identifies as Iceweasel, not Firefox (not my idea).
With the user agent switcher addon I see no difference between FF + IW.
Should I?
Ottavio Caruso wrote:
--- Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In such a case, should I tell my friend "dont apply for jobs with
capitalone
as they use a website which is not compatible with iceweasel?"
Yes, you should!
If you keep a company like that going by pumping n
--- Kamaraju Kusumanchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In such a case, should I tell my friend "dont apply for jobs with
> capitalone
> as they use a website which is not compatible with iceweasel?"
Yes, you should!
--
Ottavio Caruso
I will not purchase any computing equipment from manufactu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 07:58:45PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
H.S. writes:
IIRC, it used to work before. Maybe the browser identification string is
causing the problem!? Any suggestions?
Iceweasel identifies as Iceweasel, not Firefox (not my idea). However, it
works ex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/03/07 22:45, Tim Wescott wrote:
> Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
>> On Saturday 03 February 2007 20:58, John Hasler wrote:
[snip]
>>
> Well, if that's how rough they're going to be just to _try_ to get a job
> there, what's it going to be like to act
Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote:
On Saturday 03 February 2007 20:58, John Hasler wrote:
I'd also suggest taking your business elsewhere as these doofuses are
evidently not capable of putting up a standards-compliant site.
--
John Hasler
I recently came across capitalone's website and some of their
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 07:58:45PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> H.S. writes:
> > IIRC, it used to work before. Maybe the browser identification string is
> > causing the problem!? Any suggestions?
>
> Iceweasel identifies as Iceweasel, not Firefox (not my idea). However, it
> works exactly like Fi
On Saturday 03 February 2007 20:58, John Hasler wrote:
> I'd also suggest taking your business elsewhere as these doofuses are
> evidently not capable of putting up a standards-compliant site.
> --
> John Hasler
I recently came across capitalone's website and some of their pages
specifically req
H.S. writes:
> IIRC, it used to work before. Maybe the browser identification string is
> causing the problem!? Any suggestions?
Iceweasel identifies as Iceweasel, not Firefox (not my idea). However, it
works exactly like Firefox and so will work with any site that "supports"
Firefox. It looks a
29 matches
Mail list logo
