On 23/12/11 13:20, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 15/12/11 20:56, perlj...@gmail.com wrote:
>> After a manual entry in /etc/hosts.deny
>>
>> ip didn't blocked
>>
>> ALL: 151.12.xxx.xxx
>>
>> I wonder why?
>>
>> I use denyhosts for automatic entries
>>
>> Thank you in advance
>>
>> Nikos
>>
>>
> Check
On 15/12/11 20:56, perlj...@gmail.com wrote:
> After a manual entry in /etc/hosts.deny
>
> ip didn't blocked
>
> ALL: 151.12.xxx.xxx
>
> I wonder why?
>
> I use denyhosts for automatic entries
>
> Thank you in advance
>
> Nikos
>
>
Check /etc/hosts.allow it has precedence over /etc/hosts.d
On 12/15/2011 01:40 PM, Raf Czlonka wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:56:48AM GMT, perlj...@gmail.com wrote:
>> After a manual entry in /etc/hosts.deny
>>
>> ip didn't blocked
>>
>> ALL: 151.12.xxx.xxx
>>
>> I wonder why?
>
> What do you mean by didn't get blocked?
> Using what service/port?
>
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 11:56:48 +0200
perlj...@gmail.com wrote:
> After a manual entry in /etc/hosts.deny
>
> ip didn't blocked
>
> ALL: 151.12.xxx.xxx
>
> I wonder why?
>
Do a test without the x's, endind with just a dot
ALL: 151.12.
> I use denyhosts for automatic entries
>
> Thank you in
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:56:48AM GMT, perlj...@gmail.com wrote:
> After a manual entry in /etc/hosts.deny
>
> ip didn't blocked
>
> ALL: 151.12.xxx.xxx
>
> I wonder why?
What do you mean by didn't get blocked?
Using what service/port?
Does your service support tcp_wrappers?
> I use denyhost
5 matches
Mail list logo