On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 06:03:09PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
From: Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: helix-player and RealPlayer
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: Debian - The Universal Operating System
X-Spam-Checker-V
José Alburquerque wrote:
> Daniel Baumann wrote:
>> you mixup things.
>>
>> first, real player == helix player + real branding + two non-free
>> plugins (for mp3 and real media)
>>
>> second, you *either* install helix player *or* real player, but not
>> both. and the one does not need the other an
Daniel Baumann wrote:
you mixup things.
first, real player == helix player + real branding + two non-free
plugins (for mp3 and real media)
second, you *either* install helix player *or* real player, but not
both. and the one does not need the other anyway.
And aren't there packages for bot
you mixup things.
first, real player == helix player + real branding + two non-free
plugins (for mp3 and real media)
second, you *either* install helix player *or* real player, but not
both. and the one does not need the other anyway.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-45
Hi,
* Jerome BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041101 20:15]:
>
> David Dorward wrote:
>
> > You are looking at Helix Player, not RealPlayer. RealPlayer is a
> > non-free derivative of Helixplayer which has extra codecs. The
> > referenced page links to RealPlayer and a FAQ about the differences
> > be
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 10:55:18 +, Jerome BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[...]
>
> I get it !
>
> So, is there somewhwere a ready to install RealPlayer (10.0.1) Debian package ?
> I have just goolged, and I got nothing.
> Is it possible to build such a Package form the HelixPlayer ?
>
David Dorward wrote:
Jerome BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You probably need with the non-free (freedom) RealPlayer 10
https://player.helixcommunity.org/2004/unix/
apparently the Sid package contains the newest one: 1.0.1
and "includes the mozilla plugin".
You are looking at Helix Player, no
Jerome BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You probably need with the non-free (freedom) RealPlayer 10
> > https://player.helixcommunity.org/2004/unix/
> apparently the Sid package contains the newest one: 1.0.1
> and "includes the mozilla plugin".
You are looking at Helix Player, not RealPlay
Yes, I do:
https://player.helixcommunity.org/2004/unix/helixrealfaq.html
Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Andrea Vettorello wrote:
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 08:46:05 +, Jerome BENOIT
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks
Andrea Vettorello wrote:
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 12:44:36 +, Jerome BENOIT
<[EMAIL PROTECTE
Andrea Vettorello wrote:
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 08:46:05 +, Jerome BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks
Andrea Vettorello wrote:
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 12:44:36 +, Jerome BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
thanks for the reply.
I did it !
In fact, I am afraid that there is a missunde
> Does it mean that we cannot yet read `Real' stuff (as available on the CNN website) ?
>
> Jerome
>
seems true. but realplayer is there if license is not the most concerned.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On Mon, 01 Nov 2004 08:46:05 +, Jerome BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Andrea Vettorello wrote:
> > On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 12:44:36 +, Jerome BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Hello,
> >>
> >>thanks for the reply.
> >>I did it !
> >>
> >>In fact, I am afraid that
Thanks
Andrea Vettorello wrote:
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 12:44:36 +, Jerome BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
thanks for the reply.
I did it !
In fact, I am afraid that there is a missunderstanding.
After the installation I tried it on one of my favorite webpage:
I got some error messages, so
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 12:44:36 +, Jerome BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> thanks for the reply.
> I did it !
>
> In fact, I am afraid that there is a missunderstanding.
> After the installation I tried it on one of my favorite webpage:
> I got some error messages, so I would like
Hello,
thanks for the reply.
I did it !
In fact, I am afraid that there is a missunderstanding.
After the installation I tried it on one of my favorite webpage:
I got some error messages, so I would like to test helix well built
web site to be sure from where comes the errors ?
Thanks,
Jerome
Nick
* Jerome BENOIT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041028 19:37]:
> Hello List,
>
> how can we test the Sid helixplayer ?
Install and run it.
sudo apt-get install helix-player
Nick.
--
Debian 3.1
Linux twofish 2.6.9-looxt93c1 i686 GNU/Linux
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
do you have the gcc version that is specified in the file name?
On Monday 19 July 2004 13:51, Adam Bogacki wrote:
> I think I may have a corrupted download.
>
> > Tux:/home# chmod a+x hxplay*
> > Tux:/home# ./hxplay*
> > bash: ./hxplay-0.4.0.187-linux-2.2-libc6-gcc32-i586.bin: cannot
> > execute
(top posting only to keep thread..top posting bad...)
Hi guys,
I had the same problem trying to get the helix installer to run on woody.
Since woody uses an older version of GCC you need to download the legacy
version of the installer:
legacy-hxplay-0.4.0.187-linux-2.2-libc6-i386.bin. The same is
I think I may have a corrupted download.
Tux:/home# chmod a+x hxplay*
Tux:/home# ./hxplay*
bash: ./hxplay-0.4.0.187-linux-2.2-libc6-gcc32-i586.bin: cannot
execute binary file
I'll try downloading again in the near future - does anyone have any
better ideas ?
Adam Bogacki,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ryan
> "Moritz" == Moritz Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Moritz> Do you have xmms configured to use the esd output plugin?
Moritz> (I've no idea about the other programs...)
I would have thought this was the default. Oh, wait, no, its trying to
use the OSS plugin. Thanks for your sugg
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have not been able to get sound support working under Helix Gnome
> for several weeks now.
>
> esdplay works fine, but no Gnome programs work (xmms and Gnome Control
> Centre for instance).
Do you have xmms configured to use the esd output plugin?
(I've
Joris Lambrecht wrote:
> [ using Debian (woody/potato) with 2.4.0 kernel and Xfree86 4.0.2 ]
>
> I've recently move to the Gnome/Ximian (used to be Helix) environment.
>
> Over at the gnome/ximian sites i've read about an auto-updater (seemed much
> like windowsupdate) for Ximian, i ran the shel
When I try to run gnomecc it crashes out of X and returns me to my KDM prompt.
Is Gnome currently broken under Woody?
==
Steve Cooper
(working for somebody else in Redmond, WA)
>
> Subject: Re: Helix gnome control center freezes
> Date: Wed, 3
At Tue, 2 Jan 2001 21:08:57 -0500,
Seung-woo Nam wrote:
>
> Hi everyone:
>
> Since I upgraded my Debian system from 2.2_rev0 to 2.2_rev2, all the Sawfish
> menus in Gnome control center wouldn't work (appearance, focus behaviour,
> etc.). When I click on any of those the window just freezes and d
And Remco van de Meent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> gave word to the following thoughts:
> I can't provide a solution but I've had the same problem. Try running
> the control center using strace. You'll probably see that it tries to
> find all kind of librep/rep-gtk related things. You need to fiddle
> aro
Seung-woo Nam wrote:
> Since I upgraded my Debian system from 2.2_rev0 to 2.2_rev2, all the
> Sawfish menus in Gnome control center wouldn't work (appearance,
> focus behaviour, etc.). When I click on any of those the window just
> freezes and doesn't show any contents of menus. I know Helix gnome
Salve Seung-woo Nam,
> Has anyone had the same problem?
me too :-(
--
Paolo Pedaletti, Como, ITALYa www.fastflow.it/~paolop
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 4755831
+ [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> packages? Are they as stable? Is there any strange behavior? Do they
> contain as many programs as are available in the Helix packages? What are
> the pros and cons of each?
I switched over to a clean woody only system some days ago. I have to
do some co
On Sat, 9 Dec 2000, Rob VanFleet wrote:
> For some reason, the gnome control center doesn't want me to configure any
> sawfish aspects. When I click on any of the sawfish configuration options,
> the
> left pane displays nothing, and eventually, the entire app freezes and has to
> be killed.
>
>
I had this problem as well, you need to install the rep packages from helixcode
manually for some reason they don't install with task-helix-gnome.
Jamil
> For some reason, the gnome control center doesn't want me to configure any
> sawfish aspects. When I click on any of the sawfish configuration
You don't need to.
On approximately Wed, Nov 22, 2000 at 10:35:22AM -0500, Marcelo Chiapparini
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Should I deinstall Gnome in order to install Helix Gnome in a Debian 2.2
> machine?
> Thanks in advance
> Marcelo
> _
> Marcelo Chiapparini
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Sometime this morning, Helix made new packages available. I´ll bet
it all works OK now, so ignore my earlier post.
On Sun, Nov 12, 2000 at 09:55:07PM -0500, Joel Dinel wrote:
> I can't seem to install Helix Gnome on my woody box.
>
> dimmu:~# apt-get install task-helix-gnome
> Reading Package Li
Since the problem is a conflict between Helix and Debian versions
of some libraries, perhaps you can temporarily comment out the Debian
lines in your sources.list, do an apt-get update and then try
apt-get install task-helix-gnome. Don´t forget to fix your
sources.list afterwards or you won´t be
On Sun, 12 Nov 2000, Joel Dinel wrote:
> I can't seem to install Helix Gnome on my woody box.
Thats an interesting apt quirk, just list all the packages at once:
auric{jgg}~/apt2/build/bin#./apt-get install task-helix-gnome task-helix-core
sawfish-gnome rep-gtk-gnome libgdk-pixbuf-gnome2
Readi
> So I apt-get install task-helix-core. I get the same message, but wirh
> sawfish-gnome. I install sawfush-gnome, now I get this same message about
> rep-gtk-gnome. This goes on and on through more packages until :
>
> dimmu:~# apt-get install libgdk-pixbuf2
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joel Dinel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[ dependancy problem elided ]
> Has anybody else encountered this? Is there woody boxes out there
> running Helix?!
I see this also, but I've already got a working install of Helix
Gnome, so it's not a big deal.
Hi Johann,
Quoth Johann Spies,
> Excuse my ignorance, but after reading lynx's man page, I still do not
> understand what is actually happening in a command like this or let me
> put it this way: I do not understand how it can help to install
> helix-gnome or why it has to be run as root. As I u
Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I installed helix gnome in this way, and have since put the helix
> stuff in my sources file and have been getting updates from them, is
> there something else I should do to right it? I've noticed that
> task-helix-gnome is always held back and never u
| > -Original Message-
| > From: Johann Spies [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| > Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 3:23 AM
| > To: Debian
| > Subject:Re: HELIX and potato
| >
| > On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:19:40PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
| > > On Mon, Nov 06, 2000
P:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 3:23 AM
> To: Debian
> Subject: Re: HELIX and potato
>
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:19:40PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:47:56AM -0800, Rob Hudson wrote:
> > > lynx -source htt
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 09:19:40PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:47:56AM -0800, Rob Hudson wrote:
> > lynx -source http://go-gnome.org | sh
>
> we have been through this before, don't EVER run anything like that.
>
Excuse my ignorance, but after reading lynx's man page,
On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 09:57:12AM +1300, plutoplanet wrote:
> I guess so, but is it any more a security risk than running a binary
> from helixcode?
yes
--
Ethan Benson
http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/
pgpkjLrRX3r1k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:47:56AM -0800, Rob Hudson wrote:
> I don't know if this is the preferred way to get Helix Gnome
> installed, but I typed this at the command prompt and it worked...
>
> lynx -source http://go-gnome.org | sh
we have been through this before, don't EVER run anything like
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 03:33:17PM -0500, Anderson, Tim wrote:
> The best way would surely be to add the helixcode site to sources.list.
Yes. The first below will get you Helix; after 'apt-get update' look for the
'task' debs. iirc 'apt-get install task-helix-gnome' will get you the
complete Gnom
> Debian Ghost said these things on 20001106.1400:
> | Hey Guys,
> | I notice that there is no helix gnome package for potato.
> | Is there an eazy way to implement helix into potato? I am using regular
> | gnome and want to go to helix.
The "woody" helix packages work fine in potato. I guess the
well, the binaries wouldn't be run as root, so yes.
> -Original Message-
> Subject: RE: HELIX and potato
>
> I guess so, but is it any more a security risk than running a binary
> from helixcode?
>
> Original Message
> From: [EMAIL PROTEC
I guess so, but is it any more a security risk than running a binary
from helixcode?
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: HELIX and potato
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 15:33:17 -0500
>
>Wasn't there some discussion about this metho
I don't know if this is the preferred way to get Helix Gnome
installed, but I typed this at the command prompt and it worked...
lynx -source http://go-gnome.org | sh
-Rob.
Debian Ghost said these things on 20001106.1400:
| Hey Guys,
| I notice that there is no helix gnome package for potato.
| I
, November 06, 2000 3:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: RE: HELIX and potato
>
> Login as root and do the following:
> #lynx -source http://go-gnome.com | sh
>
Login as root and do the following:
#lynx -source http://go-gnome.com | sh
Good Luck
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: HELIX and potato
Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 14:00:16 -0500 (EST)
>Hey Guys,
>I notice that there is no helix
Hi Stefan,
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, stefan goeman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> After an upgrade (and a reboot) I have problems running WindowMaker under
> Helix Gnome.
> Gnome complains saying running a non gnome compliant windowmanger and
> WindowMaker does
> not start and I can't use Gnome either. I have
* Joel Dinel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> How can you go about changing the color of the text for the icons in Helix
> gnome ? Right now, it's black text on a gray background. I'd like white
> text with no background (shaped text). I know where to set the shaped text
> (in the gnome file manager). but I
use
>apt-get install task-helix-gnome
after you set up your sources.list file. The install instructions
at
http://www.helixcode.com
are very good. I installed helix-gnome from fvwm2 without a hitch
(I did have to restart my potato box though) but since then I have hosed
sawmill but I
On Mon, 25 Sep 2000 22:15:15 +0100, Rus said:
> Hi, I've pseudo-successfully managed to isntall Helix Gnome on my 2.2
> system.. BUT.. I am having a little bit of trouble with 3 things..
>
> 1) I am using the Sawfish WM and IIR there should be a menu or something
> available for each
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 07:20:49AM +0100 or thereabouts, Rus wrote:
> Hi, an introduction.. my name's Rus.. I've been using RedHat for a bit.. and
> now I'm making the jump to debs.. :-)
>
> Anyways... I'm just wondering if their is anything I should know about
> installing Helix gnome on top of
Thanks for helping me understand how the Debian apt-get program
can be used instead of the Helix-Gnome updater utility to install
the latest version of Gnome from the HelixCode web site.
Here is a summary of what I've learned:
1. Login as root. Note: I assume that Gnome and maybe even X should
no
> "Eric" == Eric G Miller writes:
Eric> On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 11:10:15AM -0700, Dexter Graphic wrote:
>> >apt-get install task-helix-gnome?
>>
>> Does anyone know if the helix-gnome updater will work with
>> Debian 2.2? I have the helix-gnome 1.0 CD and a very slow
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 11:10:59AM -0400 or thereabouts, Joey Tsai wrote:
>
> I don't think there is a Galeon Debian package, in either Debian "proper" or
> from Helixcode. I heard Helix was going to package it, but I also heard it
oh there is. lookie in
http://silverchair.futureks.net/~solomon
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 11:10:15AM -0700, Dexter Graphic wrote:
> >apt-get install task-helix-gnome?
>
> Does anyone know if the helix-gnome updater will work with
> Debian 2.2? I have the helix-gnome 1.0 CD and a very slow
> connection so it would be nice if I could just update the
> parts of
Anselm Almeida wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Will the helix-gnome .deb packages at the helix site work with
> Debian 2.2? The Debian site says that helix-gnome .deb packages are
> available at the helix-gnome site, but the only .deb packages available
> there are meant for woody. Are they com
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 11:10:59AM -0400, Joey Tsai wrote:
> I don't think there is a Galeon Debian package, in either Debian
> "proper" or from Helixcode. I heard Helix was going to package it,
> but I also heard it wasn't packaged in Debian because of licensing
> issues (similar to KDE before Q
>apt-get install task-helix-gnome?
Does anyone know if the helix-gnome updater will work with
Debian 2.2? I have the helix-gnome 1.0 CD and a very slow
connection so it would be nice if I could just update the
parts of gnome that have changed in version 1.2.
My concern is that the updater wor
:: Rino Mardo ::
> Hi. I have gnome-helix installed from woody and been wanting to try Galeon.
> Anyone done it yet? Is there a .deb package for Galeon?
I don't think there is a Galeon Debian package, in either Debian "proper" or
from Helixcode. I heard Helix was going to package it, but I als
Isn't that apt-get install task-helix-gnome?
Rino Mardo wrote:
> Yes you can and I have it working with potato. Here's part of my
> sources.list:
>
> deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/distributions/debian woody main
>
> You have to install it as "apt-get install task-helix-core".
>
> On Tue
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 06:04:33AM -0400 or thereabouts, Antonio Rodriguez
wrote:
> Isn't that apt-get install task-helix-gnome?
>
either works.
---
Who's watching the watchmen?
ICQ: 15096825
Yes, it will work. There is no big difference between the two yet. (potato and
woody).
Anselm Almeida wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Will the helix-gnome .deb packages at the helix site work with
> Debian 2.2? The Debian site says that helix-gnome .deb packages are
> available at the helix-gn
Yes you can and I have it working with potato. Here's part of my sources.list:
deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/distributions/debian woody main
You have to install it as "apt-get install task-helix-core".
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 12:05:59PM +0530 or thereabouts, Anselm Almeida wrote:
>
On 4, sep, 2000 at 02:33:15 -0400, A.R. wrote:
> I have installed helix-code-gnome on a potato, so far seems to be
> working very good. I still have the downloaded files in my apt/archives
> directory. The point is: I want to store all that in a cd to be able to
> install it in another computer, u
The fault is mine (as usual), there is a second part to the install
which entails apt-get install task-helix-gnome, which I'm doing now..
Dale L . Morris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I always have trouble with Helix Gnome. This time I downloaded
> everything using apt-get update. But when I change
I always have trouble with Helix Gnome. This time I downloaded
everything using apt-get update. But when I change my .xsession file
to read gnome-session, I'm back into the old gnome desktop that came
with 2.2. What am I doing wrong now? I'm running potato, but that
shouldn't make a difference, cor
On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 08:00:19AM -0700, Dale L . Morris wrote:
> Can I install this in potato or do I have to upgrade to woody? Is this
> a recommended upgrade?
The Helix GNOME packages are also for potato. currently they run on
both, potato and woody. later, when it gets harder to let these
pa
Hello,
Yes, I would also like to know this.
On Fri, 01 Sep 2000 15:00:19 Dale L . Morris wrote:
> Can I install this in potato or do I have to upgrade to woody? Is this
> a recommended upgrade?
>
> thanks
>
>
> Morten Liebach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On 1, sep, 2000 at 11:42:22 +, s
Can I install this in potato or do I have to upgrade to woody? Is this
a recommended upgrade?
thanks
Morten Liebach ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On 1, sep, 2000 at 11:42:22 +, stefan goeman wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I know that there is something around like Helix Gnome.
> >
> > Why shoul
On 1, sep, 2000 at 11:42:22 +, stefan goeman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know that there is something around like Helix Gnome.
>
> Why should I consider using this instead of the normal Gnome packed with
> Debian?
The GNOME included in Debian Potato is not being upgraded now, and since
the freez
Andrew Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 09:03:57PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
>
> > It seems like it will be better and surely safer than Outlook,
>
> Why better and, most particularly, why safer? Given that GNOME is
> built to allow components to interact with one
> > >Hi, I was reading today on slashdot about Evolution 0.3. They have a
> > download link for the tar.gz file. I was wondering if the apt-get
> utility
> > will work if I use the spidermonkey.helixgnome.com source for the
> update?
> > Has anyone else tried this?
No, this won't work. You can
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 09:03:57PM +0200, Felix Natter wrote:
> It seems like it will be better and surely safer than Outlook,
Why better and, most particularly, why safer? Given that GNOME is
built to allow components to interact with one another via scripting,
there is no reason to suppose tha
Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> At 12:03 PM 7/28/00 -0400, Ethan Pierce wrote:
> >Hi, I was reading today on slashdot about Evolution 0.3. They have a
> download link for the tar.gz file. I was wondering if the apt-get utility
> will work if I use the spidermonkey.helixgnome.com source for th
> ** On Jul 29, Ethan Pierce scribbled:
> > The main reason I am psyched for evolution is my girlfriend cant grasp pine
> > or mail. She needs something graphical. If I can avoid booting windows2000
> > so she can read her email in outlook I will be happy as a clam...hence
> > evolution is the pe
** On Jul 29, Ethan Pierce scribbled:
> The main reason I am psyched for evolution is my girlfriend cant grasp pine
> or mail. She needs something graphical. If I can avoid booting windows2000
> so she can read her email in outlook I will be happy as a clam...hence
> evolution is the perfect solu
Message -
From: "Marek Habersack" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Hans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, July 29, 2000 4:34 AM
Subject: Re: Helix Gnome Evolution 0.3
** On Jul 29, Andre Berger scribbled:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marek Habersack) writes:
>
> > it as on a marketing/support factor. If any of your customers would come to
> > you and say "hm... I would switch to Linux, but I kinda like the M$ Outlook.
> > If Linux had something like that...". Now you w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marek Habersack) writes:
> it as on a marketing/support factor. If any of your customers would come to
> you and say "hm... I would switch to Linux, but I kinda like the M$ Outlook.
> If Linux had something like that...". Now you will be able to say "Voila!
> Evolution - right h
** On Jul 29, Hans scribbled:
> At 12:03 PM 7/28/00 -0400, Ethan Pierce wrote:
> >Hi, I was reading today on slashdot about Evolution 0.3. They have a
> download link for the tar.gz file. I was wondering if the apt-get utility
> will work if I use the spidermonkey.helixgnome.com source for the up
At 12:03 PM 7/28/00 -0400, Ethan Pierce wrote:
>Hi, I was reading today on slashdot about Evolution 0.3. They have a
download link for the tar.gz file. I was wondering if the apt-get utility
will work if I use the spidermonkey.helixgnome.com source for the update?
Has anyone else tried this?
>
>T
** On Jul 28, Kent West scribbled:
> Ethan Pierce wrote:
> >
> > Sorry all, the sources.list line should read:
> >
> > deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/evolution/distributions/Debian/ ./
> >
>
> I thought the . in "./" was a typo, so I didn't include it. I got a
> bunch of dependency error
Ethan Pierce wrote:
>
> Sorry all, the sources.list line should read:
>
> deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/evolution/distributions/Debian/ ./
>
I thought the . in "./" was a typo, so I didn't include it. I got a
bunch of dependency errors. So I went back and added the . and tried
again; st
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> Hi, I was reading today on slashdot about Evolution 0.3. They have a
> download link for the tar.gz file. I was wondering if the apt-get
> utility will work if I use the spidermonkey.helixgnome.com source for
> the update? Has anyone
Sorry all, the sources.list line should read:
deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/evolution/distributions/Debian/ ./
>>> Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/28/00 12:15PM >>>
Ethan Pierce wrote:
>
> Sorry, I found the answer to my question. Evolution .3 is a Microsoft
> Outlook replacement fo
Ethan Pierce wrote:
>
> Sorry, I found the answer to my question. Evolution .3 is a Microsoft
> Outlook replacement for linux. To get it via apt-get add the following to
> sources.list
>
> deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/evolution/distributions/Debian
>
> run - apt-get update
> -
Sorry, I found the answer to my question. Evolution .3 is a Microsoft Outlook
replacement for linux. To get it via apt-get add the following to sources.list
deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/evolution/distributions/Debian
run - apt-get update
- apt-get install evolution
Enjoy - thi
On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 06:42:43PM -0400, Timothy Ritchey wrote:
> > deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/distributions/debian unstable main
>
> I've got this in my /etc/apt/souces.list file. Weird. I will keep looking at
> it.
>
Uhm, this might be obvious, but gimp-1.1.24 is not installed with
> deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/distributions/debian unstable main
I've got this in my /etc/apt/souces.list file. Weird. I will keep looking at
it.
tim
Timothy Ritchey wrote:
> Greetings!
> I have a debian system running woody, and tried to load up the HelixCode
> using their installer. Everything seemed to work okay, but even though I
> selected the full install, many packages were not installed (such as the
> 1.1.24 gimp, etc.) When I did an apt
Oh - I was under the impression it was a bit smarter than that :(
I don't think I'll bother then - Thanks Joachim.
On 09/07/00 at 22:44 Joachim Trinkwitz spake the following magic words:
>"Mark Herrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I've installed Helix Gnome on my potato system using:
>> apt-
"Mark Herrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've installed Helix Gnome on my potato system using:
> apt-get install task-helix-gnome
> and it works great, but does anyone know where I can get debs for the
> helix-updater?
Not packaged after all I know, but what would you do with it? (The
updater
Kent West wrote:
>
> Nathan E Norman wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 01:15:34PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
> > > I tried to install HelixGNOME via the instructions for Debian on
> > > the helixcore website (lynx -source blah blah blah), and chose
> > > option 3 (full install), and it looked li
Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 01:15:34PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
> > I tried to install HelixGNOME via the instructions for Debian on
> > the helixcore website (lynx -source blah blah blah), and chose
> > option 3 (full install), and it looked like everything was going
> > fin
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 01:15:34PM -0500, Kent West wrote:
> I tried to install HelixGNOME via the instructions for Debian on
> the helixcore website (lynx -source blah blah blah), and chose
> option 3 (full install), and it looked like everything was going
> fine, until I got a dependency error th
Darlock wrote:
>
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2000, Morten Liebach wrote:
>
> Currently I use the potato with Helix GNOME and runs fine, I was installed
> the Debian Potato GNOME and the upgrade works perfectly.
>
> I have this line into sources.list:
>
> deb http://spidermonkey.helixcode.com/distri
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
