Urs Thuermann put forth on 1/17/2011 4:53 PM:
> Has anyone experience or can provide a link to information on
> performance impact with the new hard drives with 4 KB sectors when
> using file system with 1 KB block size?
That 1KB block size will murder IO performance.
> My question is not about t
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Thanks--that is quite helpful. I may stick to less than 137gb to avoid
> using the adapter card.
There are two missinterpreted (because they aren't related) definitions in
ATA standards:
- physical interface PIO, S/MDMA, UDMA
- logical (software) acces
them at Sam's Club
(WalMart) for $200 each
--
David
-Original Message-
From: Richard Otte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ric Otte
Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2003 11:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: hard drives larger than 137gb
Thanks--that is quite helpful. I may sti
Thanks--that is quite helpful. I may stick to less than 137gb to avoid
using the adapter card.
Ric
On Sat, Mar 08, 2003 at 08:13:17PM -0600, Lupust wrote:
>
> The 2.4.x kernel supports them, but you also have to have either a
> mainboard with ATA/133 or a ATA/133 adapter card. I am using a 160
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 09:32:18AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 08:08, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
>
> > The board is:
> >
> >UltraATA 133 PCI (P/N: SC-PE4B12)
>
> Ok, but what brand?
Sorry, meant to include that. It's an SIIG card:
http://siig.com/products/ide/featur
On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 08:08, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 03:18:32AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 20:13, Lupust wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 12:13, Ric Otte wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is it possible to use some of the large IDE hard drives (such as
> > >
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 03:18:32AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 20:13, Lupust wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 12:13, Ric Otte wrote:
> >
> > > Is it possible to use some of the large IDE hard drives (such as
> > > 160, 180, 200gb) that are being advertised with linux? If so
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 20:13, Lupust wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 12:13, Ric Otte wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it possible to use some of the large IDE hard drives (such as 160,
> > 180, 200gb) that are being advertised with linux? If so, is some sort
> > of patch needed to be able to 'see' the wh
On Sat, 2003-03-08 at 12:13, Ric Otte wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to use some of the large IDE hard drives (such as 160,
> 180, 200gb) that are being advertised with linux? If so, is some sort
> of patch needed to be able to 'see' the whole drive? And can I install
> it just as I would a no
Ric Otte said:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to use some of the large IDE hard drives (such as 160, 180,
> 200gb) that are being advertised with linux? If so, is some sort of
> patch needed to be able to 'see' the whole drive? And can I install it
> just as I would a normal hard drive?Thanks,
if
On Tuesday 17 July 2001 16:41, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 04:14:48PM -0700, allen wayne best just ramblin in
his amx wrote:
> > > > 'bout the only thing i can say about which ide controller is used is
> > > > that it is built into the motherboard in a hp vectra vl.
> > > >
> > > >
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 04:14:48PM -0700, allen wayne best just ramblin in his
amx wrote:
> > > 'bout the only thing i can say about which ide controller is used is that
> > > it is built into the motherboard in a hp vectra vl.
> > >
> > > and the driver version is one thing i did notice: redhat
On Tuesday 17 July 2001 16:14, allen wayne best just ramblin in his amx wrote:
> > > 'bout the only thing i can say about which ide controller is used is
> > > that it is built into the motherboard in a hp vectra vl.
> > >
> > > and the driver version is one thing i did notice: redhat 7.1 has an id
On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:39:03PM -0700, allen wayne best just ramblin in his
amx wrote:
> initially, i had the setup as
> disk
> disk
> cd-rom
> disk
>
> with all jumpers (master/slave) appropriatly set.
> and as previously noted, redhat 7.1 (2.4.2) saw the configuration,
> debian (2.2.12) di
> > 'bout the only thing i can say about which ide controller is used is that
> > it is built into the motherboard in a hp vectra vl.
> >
> > and the driver version is one thing i did notice: redhat 7.1 has an ide
> > driver version 1.10 whereas debian with 2.2.12 has an ide driver version
> > of
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 01:08:39PM -0700, allen wayne best just ramblin in his
amx wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 July 2001 10:45, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:39:03PM -0700, allen wayne best just ramblin in
> his amx wrote:
> > > initially, i had the setup as
> > > disk
> > > disk
>
On Tuesday 17 July 2001 10:45, Mike Fedyk wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 01:39:03PM -0700, allen wayne best just ramblin in
his amx wrote:
> > initially, i had the setup as
> > disk
> > disk
> > cd-rom
> > disk
> >
> > with all jumpers (master/slave) appropriatly set.
> > and as previously noted
I seem to recall that way back (around 1994, 1995) I found that with a Tekram
IDE
card (set up as secondary IDE controller) I could only see the last drive if I
had it primary on the controller, with the CD as slave. It might be the IDE
controller causing you grief - although I'm surprised if that
On Monday 16 July 2001 12:52, Martin F. Krafft wrote:
> also sprach allen wayne best just ramblin in his amx (on Mon, 16 Jul 2001
12:32:21PM -0700):
> > in addition, if i were not seeing hdc already, i would not be as
> > mystified. on the other hand, given that hdc is there, i would have
> > expe
also sprach allen wayne best just ramblin in his amx (on Mon, 16 Jul 2001
12:32:21PM -0700):
> in addition, if i were not seeing hdc already, i would not be as mystified.
> on the other hand, given that hdc is there, i would have expected hdd to be
> as well. am i missing something here???
hdc
On Monday 16 July 2001 09:06, Martin F. Krafft wrote:
> also sprach allen wayne best just ramblin in his amx (on Mon, 16 Jul 2001
08:51:12AM -0700):
> > yes, both are "out of the box" kernels. redhat is 2.4.2 from redhat 7.1
>
> i think this may well be your problem. especially newer harddrives
>
also sprach allen wayne best just ramblin in his amx (on Mon, 16 Jul 2001
08:51:12AM -0700):
> yes, both are "out of the box" kernels. redhat is 2.4.2 from redhat 7.1
i think this may well be your problem. especially newer harddrives
don't like to be slaves of older stuff (cdroms in particular).
On Monday 16 July 2001 08:50, Martin F. Krafft wrote:
> also sprach allen wayne best just ramblin in his amx (on Mon, 16 Jul 2001
08:21:10AM -0700):
> > i am having a particularly baffling problem.
>
> what's the redhat kernel version? and are you using stock kernels?
yes, both are "out of the bo
also sprach allen wayne best just ramblin in his amx (on Mon, 16 Jul 2001
08:21:10AM -0700):
> i am having a particularly baffling problem.
what's the redhat kernel version? and are you using stock kernels?
compare the two kernel configs, and do a recompile with the same
options for IDE devices..
24 matches
Mail list logo
