On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 02:28:26PM +0200, Andrej Kacian wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:28:32 -0700
> Freeman wrote:
>
> >The disadvantage is wasted space, since each partition has some expansion
> >room that equals lost contiguous bulk space. (Reading up on LVM's is on my
> >todo list.)
>
>
On Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:28:32 -0700
Freeman wrote:
>The disadvantage is wasted space, since each partition has some expansion
>room that equals lost contiguous bulk space. (Reading up on LVM's is on my
>todo list.)
You really should, there's no reason not to use LVM, especially for wacky
setup
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 04:50 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 06/11/2011 04:22 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > I don't like to insert a CD either :).
> >
>
> I can't tell if you're telling a joke or being eccentric.
Both :), kidding here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@
On 06/11/2011 04:22 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
[snip]
I don't like to insert a CD either :).
I can't tell if you're telling a joke or being eccentric.
--
"Neither the wisest constitution nor the wisest laws will secure
the liberty and happiness of a people whose manners are universally
corrupt.
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 04:17 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 6/10/2011 2:11 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 21:49 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >> for single user or
> >>
> >> /
> >> /home
> >> /media/big -> /home/$user1/big
> >> /media/big -> /home/$user2/big
> >
> > For a sing
On 6/10/2011 2:11 PM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 21:49 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> for single user or
>>
>> /
>> /home
>> /media/big -> /home/$user1/big
>> /media/big -> /home/$user2/big
>
> For a single user I switched from / + /home to / only.
> For special tasks I add e.g.
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:23:08AM -0700, prad wrote:
> in the past we've had two partitions:
> /
> /data
> into the latter went home, www, mail and we'd softlink from the
> appropriate places. the nice thing about this setup has always been that
> when we upgraded or tried a different system there
On Sat, 2011-06-11 at 00:54 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Vi, 10 iun 11, 21:11:49, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > The advantage to have / only, including /home is, that you don't need
> > think that much about allocation of free space. You anyway can do
> > separated backups. And having tons of
On Vi, 10 iun 11, 21:11:49, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> The advantage to have / only, including /home is, that you don't need
> think that much about allocation of free space. You anyway can do
> separated backups. And having tons of individual mounted directories
> won't speed up anything or won't ha
On Fri, 2011-06-10 at 21:49 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> for single user or
>
> /
> /home
> /media/big -> /home/$user1/big
> /media/big -> /home/$user2/big
For a single user I switched from / + /home to / only.
For special tasks I add e.g. /music_productions to /mnt or /home.
The advantage to
On Lu, 06 iun 11, 09:23:08, prad wrote:
> in the past we've had two partitions:
> /
> /data
> into the latter went home, www, mail and we'd softlink from the
> appropriate places. the nice thing about this setup has always been that
> when we upgraded or tried a different system there wasn't any da
On 06/06/2011 11:23 AM, prad wrote:
in the past we've had two partitions:
/
/data
into the latter went home, www, mail and we'd softlink from the
appropriate places. the nice thing about this setup has always been that
when we upgraded or tried a different system there wasn't any data
copying to
* prad [2011-06-06 09:23:08 -0700]:
> in the past we've had two partitions:
> /
> /data
> into the latter went home, www, mail and we'd softlink from the
> appropriate places. the nice thing about this setup has always been that
> when we upgraded or tried a different system there wasn't any data
13 matches
Mail list logo
