On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:43:00 -0500
Francis Gerund wrote:
>[re: "Most people who post here subscribe to the list, so they will
>receive any response you make to the debian-user list. If you send to
>the list and to them, they get two copies of each message."]
>
>
>
>Just a note on email addressin
On Saturday 12 December 2015 08:49:51 Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:49:19PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Friday 11 December 2015 23:33:52 Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:20:38PM -0500, Francis Gerund wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > > "What's wrong with just
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:49:19PM +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 11 December 2015 23:33:52 Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:20:38PM -0500, Francis Gerund wrote:
[...]
> > > "What's wrong with just using a launcher anyway, if it comes up that
> > > way?", maybe I am jus
On 12/08/2015 02:00 PM, Francis Gerund wrote:
Hello!
I just installed Debian 8.2, 64-bit, Gnome desktop, using the
netinst.iso. Used Synaptic to install Gufw (and ufw as dependency).Â
Ufw works fine.
But gufw does not show in the application menu or in the favories menu
of Gnome. The only w
Chris Bannister writes:
> I reckon bottom posting is worse than top posting if the poster doesn't
> trim anything.
I agree. When I open a message and see only quoted material I just
delete it and go on. I don't understand what's so damn difficult about
deleting a few lines.
--
John Hasler
jhas
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 12:53:09PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
>
> "Bottom posting" posting after the message to which the reply is made,
> so that people who are reading the reply, if they are worth anything,
> will read the message to which the reply is made, before reading the
> reply that is made
On Friday 11 December 2015 23:33:52 Chris Bannister wrote:
> [PLease don't top post.]
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:20:38PM -0500, Francis Gerund wrote:
> > I am using the Gnome 3 "classic" desktop.
> >
> > When I push the mouser pointer up into the hot-spot in the upper left
> > corner of the scr
[PLease don't top post.]
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:20:38PM -0500, Francis Gerund wrote:
> I am using the Gnome 3 "classic" desktop.
>
> When I push the mouser pointer up into the hot-spot in the upper left
> corner of the screen, a (sort of) oval pops up containing a magnifying
> glass icon and
On Thursday 10 December 2015 19:43:00 Francis Gerund wrote:
> I was using gmail, with it's built-in interface. Although the default
> reply setting was set to "reply all", for some reason it automatically adds
> the email address of the last person to reply to a thread, in addition to
> ALSO reply
On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:43:00 -0500
Francis Gerund wrote:
Hello Francis,
>reply setting was set to "reply all", for some reason it automatically
>adds the email address of the last person to reply to a thread, in
>addition to ALSO replying to the whole list.
That's what "Reply All" means - send
On 12/10/2015 02:43 PM, Francis Gerund wrote:
[re: "Most people who post here subscribe to the list, so they will
receive any response you make to the debian-user list. If you send to the
list and to them, they get two copies of each message."]
Just a note on email addressing:
I was using gm
[re: "Most people who post here subscribe to the list, so they will
receive any response you make to the debian-user list. If you send to the
list and to them, they get two copies of each message."]
Just a note on email addressing:
I was using gmail, with it's built-in interface. Although the
On Tue, 2015-12-08 at 23:27 -0500, Jape Person wrote:
> > BTW, I really think that "blocking" line in the desktop.gufw was
> > deliberate. I think they knew exactly what they were doing.
> >
>
> Yes, of course. That line didn't write itself. I think it's really
> odd,
> too, but I'm sure that w
On 09/12/2015, Jape Person wrote:
>
> Just as a matter of etiquette for this mailing list, I thought I'd
> mention a couple of things.
>
> 1. It's best not to reply directly to another user's e-mail address --
> unless that user has specifically requested to be CC'd. Most people who
> post here
On 12/08/2015 10:55 PM, Francis Gerund wrote:
Yes!
Thank you, Jape. This was the answer:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681315.
I guess I'm going to have to learn to hunt down (and to read) bug
reports. Ugh!
Reading Is Fundamental (blast from the past).
When you don't kn
Yes!
Thank you, Jape. This was the answer:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681315.
I guess I'm going to have to learn to hunt down (and to read) bug reports.
Ugh!
Just editing the desktop.gufw file to comment out the offending (and
offensive!) line fixed it.
It now shows up (an
On 12/08/2015 09:20 PM, Francis Gerund wrote:
I am using the Gnome 3 "classic" desktop.
When I push the mouser pointer up into the hot-spot in the upper left
corner of the screen, a (sort of) oval pops up containing a magnifying
glass icon and the words "Type to search . . . ". If I type in "gu
I am using the Gnome 3 "classic" desktop.
When I push the mouser pointer up into the hot-spot in the upper left
corner of the screen, a (sort of) oval pops up containing a magnifying
glass icon and the words "Type to search . . . ". If I type in "gufw", it
just bluntly says "No results.".
But if
On Wednesday 09 December 2015 01:32:39 Jape Person wrote:
> On 12/08/2015 04:57 PM, Francis Gerund wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I just installed Debian 8.2, 64-bit, Gnome desktop, using the
> > netinst.iso. Used Synaptic to install Gufw (and ufw as dependency).
> > Ufw works fine.
> >
> > But gufw do
On 12/08/2015 04:57 PM, Francis Gerund wrote:
Hello!
I just installed Debian 8.2, 64-bit, Gnome desktop, using the
netinst.iso. Used Synaptic to install Gufw (and ufw as dependency).
Ufw works fine.
But gufw does not show in the application menu or in the favories menu
of Gnome. The only way
20 matches
Mail list logo
