On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 07:12 -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> > For one thing, I don't think the real JS would send to me as well as
> > to the list.
>
> I wouldn't do it on purpose, anyway :)
Or send top-posting HTML formatted mails. Or ...
The fake to be Jerry wasn't done very good, but it anyway c
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> On 6/10/2014 6:51 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 06:18:23 +1000
>>>> Subject: Re: GPG Keys. was Re: Should I install chkroo
On 6/10/2014 6:57 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:51:16 +1000
>>
>>> Subject: Re: GPG Keys. was Re: Should I install chkrootkit?
>>> From: ros...@gmail.com
>>> CC: deb
On 6/10/2014 6:51 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 06:18:23 +1000
>>> Subject: Re: GPG Keys. was Re: Should I install chkrootkit?
>>> From: ros...@gmail.com
>>> CC: debian-us
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 8:53 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 20:51:16 +1000
>
>> Subject: Re: GPG Keys. was Re: Should I install chkrootkit?
>> From: ros...@gmail.com
>> CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>> To: debian-user@lists.debian.o
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 8:42 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 06:18:23 +1000
>> Subject: Re: GPG Keys. was Re: Should I install chkrootkit?
>> From: ros...@gmail.com
>> CC: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>
&
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 06/08/2014 06:20 PM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 08 iun 14, 23:37:40, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 00:22 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>>>
>>> Could you please elaborate on this?
>>
>> What should I explain? That signing us
On Du, 08 iun 14, 23:37:40, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 00:22 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > Could you please elaborate on this?
>
> What should I explain? That signing usually is unwanted? It's usually
> unwanted, because there is absolutely no reason to sign mails to a
> m
On Mon, 2014-06-09 at 00:22 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Du, 08 iun 14, 22:05:03, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> >
> > I will not sign my emails to mailing lists, however, you're mistaken,
> > several people subscribed to Debian user sign there mails. Those people
> > are not blacklisted, perhaps ther
On Du, 08 iun 14, 22:05:03, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> I will not sign my emails to mailing lists, however, you're mistaken,
> several people subscribed to Debian user sign there mails. Those people
> are not blacklisted, perhaps there are kangaroos or penguins in their
> kitchen, I don't know, anywa
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Chris Angelico wrote:
...but I would consider it pretty silly if we had to concern
ourselves with the possibility that some other debian-user
contributor would show up on our doorsteps with an axe.
Hm.
We should not have to be considering such ridiculous possibilities.
On 6/8/2014 4:18 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> But hopefully it won't ever come to the point of mattering. It really
>>> is silly when people start trying to spoof other people's emails.
>>>
>>
>> Chris,
>>
>> It's more than silly. In many co
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 6:10 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>> But hopefully it won't ever come to the point of mattering. It really
>> is silly when people start trying to spoof other people's emails.
>>
>
> Chris,
>
> It's more than silly. In many countries (including the United States),
> it can be c
On 6/8/2014 1:20 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Andrei POPESCU
> wrote:
>> On Lu, 09 iun 14, 02:07:46, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>>> On 9/06/2014 1:56 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
https://wiki.debian.org/Keysigning/Offers#AU
>>>
>>> Okay, not many people listed;
On Sun, 2014-06-08 at 17:53 +0200, Bzzz wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 01:43:28 +1000
> Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>
> > > If one is living in the USA or western Europe getting one's key
> > > signed shouldn't be too difficult.
> >
> > How about Australia?
>
> Not allowed: if you sign your e-mails,
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 2:22 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 09 iun 14, 02:07:46, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>> On 9/06/2014 1:56 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> >
>> > https://wiki.debian.org/Keysigning/Offers#AU
>>
>> Okay, not many people listed; I thought there would be many more. I
>> don't know
Ahoj,
Dňa Sun, 8 Jun 2014 17:53:28 +0200 Bzzz napísal:
> On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 01:43:28 +1000
> Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>
> > > If one is living in the USA or western Europe getting one's key
> > > signed shouldn't be too difficult.
> >
> > How about Australia?
>
> Not allowed: if you sign you
On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 02:07:46 +1000
Andrew McGlashan wrote:
Hello Andrew,
>Okay, not many people listed; I thought there would be many more. I
>don't know any of them personally.
You don't have to. So long as there's one close enough to you for it to
be convenient to arrange a meeting those pe
On Lu, 09 iun 14, 02:07:46, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> On 9/06/2014 1:56 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Keysigning/Offers#AU
>
> Okay, not many people listed; I thought there would be many more. I
> don't know any of them personally.
That's not necessary, the point of
On 9/06/2014 1:56 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 09 iun 14, 01:43:28, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>>
>> And the fingerprint?
>
> $ gpg --fingerprint EF22341C
> pub 4096R/EF22341C 2013-07-28
> Key fingerprint = E44E B88C E21B 858E 3639 7AA4 FFC7 8544 EF22 341C
> uid Andrei
On Lu, 09 iun 14, 01:43:28, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
>
> And the fingerprint?
$ gpg --fingerprint EF22341C
pub 4096R/EF22341C 2013-07-28
Key fingerprint = E44E B88C E21B 858E 3639 7AA4 FFC7 8544 EF22 341C
uid Andrei Mircea POPESCU
sub 4096R/5D7DFF29 2013-07-28
> I wro
On Mon, 09 Jun 2014 01:43:28 +1000
Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> > If one is living in the USA or western Europe getting one's key
> > signed shouldn't be too difficult.
>
> How about Australia?
Not allowed: if you sign your e-mails, they'll blacklist
you, you'll suffer a kangaroo invasion in your
On Saturday 28 October 2006 11:56, David Nason wrote:
> John:
>
> I read your reply on this question, and I am still having problems like the
> one Roberto raised. On one machine, I exported the key, and the result was
> an .asc file. I copied that file to the second machine and imported that
> f
John:
I read your reply on this question, and I am still having problems like
the one Roberto raised. On one machine, I exported the key, and the
result was an .asc file. I copied that file to the second machine and
imported that file. It shows that imported key on the list of keys,
but Trusted
On Thursday 28 September 2006 00:11, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 12:07:03AM +1000, John O'Hagan wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I have some GPG-encrypted files (using the Kgpg front-end) on one box,
> > which I copied to another box, along with the contents of ~/.gnupg and
> > /
On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 12:07:03AM +1000, John O'Hagan wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I have some GPG-encrypted files (using the Kgpg front-end) on one box, which
> I
> copied to another box, along with the contents of ~/.gnupg and /etc/gnupg. If
> I attempt to decrypt the files on the new box, it fails
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:41:59 +
Doofus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Willie Wonka wrote:
>
> >
> >On the web I found this;
> >
> >
> >Bug#302692: gnupg-agent: Don't use (undocumented) max-cache-ttl switch
> >
> >Package: gnupg-
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:41:59 +
Doofus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Willie Wonka wrote:
>
> >
> >On the web I found this;
> >
> >
> >Bug#302692: gnupg-agent: Don't use (undocumented) max-cache-ttl switch
> >
> >Package: gnupg-
On Friday, 10.03.2006 at 10:34 +, Jon Dowland wrote:
> At 1141903950, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 19:03:51 + Dave Ewart
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > where N is the number of seconds to cache for. I don't remember
> > > where this was documented!
> >
> > pe
At 1141903950, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 19:03:51 + Dave Ewart
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > where N is the number of seconds to cache for. I don't
> > remember where this was documented!
>
> perfect, thanks, and afaict, its not documented, or at
> least not very we
Magnus Therning wrote:
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 09:49:44PM +, Doofus wrote:
Does anyone know if there's a preferred method for setting up the same
gpg profile (keys) on multiple machines?
I'm surprised I haven't been able to find much on the web about this.
Surely there must be thousands
Willie Wonka wrote:
On the web I found this;
Bug#302692: gnupg-agent: Don't use (undocumented) max-cache-ttl switch
Package: gnupg-agent
Version: 1.9.15-5
Severity: normal
Hi!
If one wants to set default-cache-ttl to a la
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 19:03:51 +
> Dave Ewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > <>
> >
> > To set the timeout for gpg-agent, include in
~/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf:
> >
> > default-cache-ttl N
> > max-cache-ttl N
> >
> > where N is the number of seconds to cache for.
On Thu, 9 Mar 2006 19:03:51 +
Dave Ewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> <>
>
> To set the timeout for gpg-agent, include in ~/.gnupg/gpg-agent.conf:
>
> default-cache-ttl N
> max-cache-ttl N
>
> where N is the number of seconds to cache for. I don't remember where
> this was documented!
per
On Thursday, 09.03.2006 at 19:43 +0100, Maurits van Rees wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:11:47AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> > So I followed your advice and installed gpg-agent, and also made my
> > passphrase "better" on the assumption that I'd be typing it less. So
> > that's all g
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:11:47AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> So I followed your advice and installed gpg-agent, and also made my
> passphrase "better" on the assumption that I'd be typing it less. So
> that's all great and gpg-agent seems to work really well, but I'm
> still typing in m
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 19:38:47 -0500
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
><>
>
> Which is why it is better to use gpg-agent and make your MUA talk to it
> instead of asking for your passphrase directly. Personally, I like
> using keychain in conjunction with ssh-agent and gpg-agent.
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 15:40 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 21:49:44 +
> Doofus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Does anyone know if there's a preferred method for setting up the same
> > gpg profile (keys) on multiple machines?
> >
> > I'm surprised I haven't been
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 21:49:44 +
Doofus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone know if there's a preferred method for setting up the same
gpg profile (keys) on multiple machines?
I'm surprised I haven't been able to find much on the web about this.
Surely ther
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 09:49:44PM +, Doofus wrote:
>Does anyone know if there's a preferred method for setting up the same
>gpg profile (keys) on multiple machines?
>
>I'm surprised I haven't been able to find much on the web about this.
>Surely there must be thousands of us sending/receiving
On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 21:49:44 +
Doofus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know if there's a preferred method for setting up the same
> gpg profile (keys) on multiple machines?
>
> I'm surprised I haven't been able to find much on the web about this.
> Surely there must be thousands of
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 17:17 -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> It appears that you have debsig-verify installed. Unless you have some
> reason to be wanting dpkg to check internal gpg signatures of packages,
> which are not widely or consistently used in debian, you can remove it.
> This has nothing to do
Glenn English wrote:
> dpkg: error
> processing /var/cache/apt/archives/anjuta-common_1.2.4a-2_all.deb
> (--unpack):
> Verification on
> package /var/cache/apt/archives/anjuta-common_1.2.4a-2_all.deb failed!
> Authenticating /var/cache/apt/archives/anjuta_1.2.4a-2_i386.deb ...
> debsig: Origin Sig
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 12:19:44AM +0200, Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> A problem recurrently happens on my computer :
>
> I have 2 public keyrings :
...
I very recently noticed this. If you put the writeable keyring last
it works.
Enjoy
Christian
44 matches
Mail list logo
