"apt-get remove x-common" will do the trick.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/07/05 13:35, wrote:
I was just moving my menu panel to the right-hand side and I was
trying to adjust its width (or height as it would have been while on
the bottom side).
There is a dialog box with a increment control to set the value, and
while I was scrolling this up,
Jochen Schulz wrote, on 06/14/05 14:31:
Cliff Flood:
Is there anything I can do to fix it and restore my nicely configured,
efficient Gnome working environment? :)
Try 'apt-get -f install' without any further arguments. If that fails, I
would try to remove suspicious packages and reinstall t
Cliff Flood:
>
> Is there anything I can do to fix it and restore my nicely configured,
> efficient Gnome working environment? :)
Try 'apt-get -f install' without any further arguments. If that fails, I
would try to remove suspicious packages and reinstall them.
J.
--
I wish I was gay.
[Agree
James Miller wrote, on 06/09/05 13:43:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
gnome-panel: Depends: libbonoboui2-0 (>= 2.5.4) but it is not going to
be installed
Depends: libecal6 (>= 1.0.4) but it is not going to be
installed
Depends: libedataserver3 (>
On 6/11/05, Marc Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:22:06PM +0200, Tom wrote:
> > [Thursday 09 June 2005 20:33] James Miller
> > (Re: gnome-panel .. gone .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > > PS A newly-discovered ancient C
James Miller wrote:
> mymachine:/home/user# apt-get -f install gnome-panel
> It all woiks!
Nyuk nyuk nyuk. Yea!
--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
plets_2.8.2-3_i386.deb) ...
> Setting up gnome-applets (2.8.2-3) ...
>
> mymachine:/home/user#
>
> It all woiks! Just like before the infamous dist-upgrade!
>
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Tom wrote:
>
>> [Thursday 09 June 2005 20:33] James Miller
>>(Re: gnome-pane
.)
Unpacking gnome-applets (from .../gnome-applets_2.8.2-3_i386.deb) ...
Setting up gnome-applets (2.8.2-3) ...
mymachine:/home/user#
It all woiks! Just like before the infamous dist-upgrade!
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Tom wrote:
[Thursday 09 June 2005 20:33] James Miller
(Re: gnome-panel .. gone
Marc Wilson wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:22:06PM +0200, Tom wrote:
>
>
>>[Thursday 09 June 2005 20:33] James Miller
>> (Re: gnome-panel .. gone .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>>
>>
>>
>>>PS A newly-discovered ancient Chinese proverb: wh
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 10:22:06PM +0200, Tom wrote:
> [Thursday 09 June 2005 20:33] James Miller
> (Re: gnome-panel .. gone .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > PS A newly-discovered ancient Chinese proverb: when Debain releases,
> > wise man running unstable does not
[Thursday 09 June 2005 20:33] James Miller
(Re: gnome-panel .. gone .. [EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> PS A newly-discovered ancient Chinese proverb: when Debain releases,
> wise man running unstable does not dist-upgrade hastily :)
Or they just read up on what apt says it'll do,
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Mike Ward wrote:
If there was ever a thing that taught me to not get relaxed and take
it for granted that apt-get would handle everything nicely for me,
this is it.
/me grumbles and goes back to his panel-less desktop.
This amounts to more or less and inconvenience for me.
%% Mike Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
mw> If there was ever a thing that taught me to not get relaxed and
mw> take it for granted that apt-get would handle everything nicely
mw> for me, this is it.
APT can't help you with bugs in the software or packaging. If you don't
want an "unstable
On Thursday 09 of June 2005 18:19, Mike Ward wrote:
> If there was ever a thing that taught me to not get relaxed and take
> it for granted that apt-get would handle everything nicely for me,
> this is it.
>
> /me grumbles and goes back to his panel-less desktop.
>
> Additionally, I've noticed my n
If there was ever a thing that taught me to not get relaxed and take
it for granted that apt-get would handle everything nicely for me,
this is it.
/me grumbles and goes back to his panel-less desktop.
Additionally, I've noticed my non-us.debian.org apt source is
returning 404's on updating. I h
The same thing happened top me testerday on 'Debian Unstable' after
updating which Synaptic. I have not had the time to do anything about it
yet, but I imagine there is some configuration file that needs tweeking.
alan bonard wrote:
Hi, I logged into a seldom-used account to satisfy an 80 yr.
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 07:43 -0500, James Miller wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, alan bonard wrote:
>
> > Hi, I logged into a seldom-used account to satisfy an 80 yr. old
> > lady's wish to send an urgent
> > email and found two panels giving me a choice between 'X-settings' and
> > 'Gnome-session',
>
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, alan bonard wrote:
Hi, I logged into a seldom-used account to satisfy an 80 yr. old
lady's wish to send an urgent
email and found two panels giving me a choice between 'X-settings' and
'Gnome-session',
choosing the latter out of long-term habit. I then found gnome-panels
to b
On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, alan bonard wrote:
Hi, I logged into a seldom-used account to satisfy an 80 yr. old
lady's wish to send an urgent
email and found two panels giving me a choice between 'X-settings' and
'Gnome-session',
choosing the latter out of long-term habit. I then found gnome-panels
to b
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 11:52:12AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> alan bonard wrote:
>
> >Is this something affecting other Debian unstable users at the moment,
> >or just me ?
>
> I'd bet it's to do with the gnome 2.10 packages being on their way into
> unstable. I'd avoid using unstable for machi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Dowland wrote:
> alan bonard wrote:
>
>> Is this something affecting other Debian unstable users at the moment,
>> or just me ?
>
>
> I'd bet it's to do with the gnome 2.10 packages being on their way into
> unstable. I'd avoid using unstable fo
alan bonard wrote:
Is this something affecting other Debian unstable users at the moment,
or just me ?
I'd bet it's to do with the gnome 2.10 packages being on their way into
unstable. I'd avoid using unstable for machines that you need to work at
short notice.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
23 matches
Mail list logo
