Re: git-buildpackage vs. dpkg-buildpackage

2014-11-06 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Jo, 06 nov 14, 20:08:50, basti wrote: > Hello, > I know that this can be a bit off-topic. > When I try to build a package based on git and use > > git-buildpackage => docs are not include in deb-file. > dpkg-buildpackage => docs ARE include in deb-file. > > dh_installdocs is included in rules

Re: Re: git-buildpackage

2013-05-17 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Vi, 17 mai 13, 17:21:21, Loyall, David wrote: > Andrei wrote: > > Then you would be in the best position to > > improve the documentation. > > I do appreciate your enthusiasm for encouraging folks to contribute, > but this statement is clearly factually wrong. :) I would accept "In > the fut

Re: Re: git-buildpackage

2013-05-17 Thread Loyall, David
Andrei wrote: > Then you would be in the best position to > improve the documentation. I do appreciate your enthusiasm for encouraging folks to contribute, but this statement is clearly factually wrong. :) I would accept "In the future, you might find yourself in the best position to improve th

Re: Re: git-buildpackage

2013-05-17 Thread Loyall, David
> What is the output of "git tag -l" in your repository? 0.1 0.2 0.3 [...many lines...] 3.20121212 3.20130212 3.20130504 etch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debi

Re: git-buildpackage

2013-05-17 Thread Jonathan Dowland
What is the output of "git tag -l" in your repository? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130517124720.GB7141@debian

Re: git-buildpackage

2013-05-16 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Mi, 15 mai 13, 21:57:29, Loyall, David wrote: > Hello. > > Originally I authored this message for the developer of > git-buildpackage, but then I realized that I have no idea how many > such inquiries he might receive, so I'd better not send one more. ... > I believe that the source of my tr