Re: getting gnome 3

2012-07-10 Thread Stephen Allen
On Sat, Jul 07, 2012 at 07:39:37PM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote: > > > I know I go against most people when I say that now I've gotten used > to Gnome3 I really like it and would not want to go back. It may be > that I run a two screen set-up, but for me the really nice features > are +100 Like yo

Re: getting gnome 3

2012-07-09 Thread Robert Holtzm
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 03:03:19PM -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote: > On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Camaleón wrote: > > > > You'll be forced to upgrade to GNOME3. > > Yes, and and that forced upgrade comes from more than just Debian. > > > I see no gnome2/gnome3 packaging differentiation as it

Re: getting gnome 3

2012-07-09 Thread Camaleón
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 15:03:19 -0500, Christofer C. Bell wrote: > On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Camaleón wrote: >> >> You'll be forced to upgrade to GNOME3. > > Yes, and and that forced upgrade comes from more than just Debian. Exactly. That's an upstream decision (while GNOME 2 is still suppor

Re: getting gnome 3

2012-07-08 Thread Christofer C. Bell
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Camaleón wrote: > > You'll be forced to upgrade to GNOME3. Yes, and and that forced upgrade comes from more than just Debian. > I see no gnome2/gnome3 packaging differentiation as it happened with kde3/ > kde4 in its early stage, most sure because gnome3 is now st

Re: getting gnome 3

2012-07-07 Thread Alan Chandler
On 08/07/12 04:13, cletusjenkins wrote: > I know I go against most people when I say that now I've gotten used to > Gnome3 I really like it and would not want to go back. It may be that I > run a two screen set-up, but for me the really nice features are > > > -- > Alan Chandl

Re: getting gnome 3

2012-07-07 Thread Marc Shapiro
On 07/06/2012 09:04 PM, Dom wrote: On 07/07/12 03:30, Marc Shapiro wrote: On 07/03/2012 06:47 AM, Camaleón wrote: On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 20:48:53 +0200, Kristoffer Gustafsson wrote: Is there an easy way to install gnome 3 and the latest packages in squeeze? Because that I can install. No. If yo

Re: getting gnome 3

2012-07-07 Thread Alan Chandler
On 07/07/12 07:20, cletusjenkins wrote: > You'll have to use Gnome3. You can use it in "Gnome Classic" mode > (fallback) for now, but it has been strongly hinted that that option > won't be available for much longer. > > I've switched to XFCE, as Gnome3 was too much of a PITA to try

Re: getting gnome 3

2012-07-07 Thread Camaleón
On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 19:30:18 -0700, Marc Shapiro wrote: > On 07/03/2012 06:47 AM, Camaleón wrote: >> On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 20:48:53 +0200, Kristoffer Gustafsson wrote: >> >>> Is there an easy way to install gnome 3 and the latest packages in >>> squeeze? Because that I can install. >> No. If you wan

Re: getting gnome 3

2012-07-06 Thread cletusjenkins
> You'll have to use Gnome3. You can use it in "Gnome Classic" mode > (fallback) for now, but it has been strongly hinted that that option > won't be available for much longer. > > I've switched to XFCE, as Gnome3 was too much of a PITA to try and use > on my laptop (I used pinning to ke

Re: getting gnome 3

2012-07-06 Thread Dom
On 07/07/12 03:30, Marc Shapiro wrote: On 07/03/2012 06:47 AM, Camaleón wrote: On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 20:48:53 +0200, Kristoffer Gustafsson wrote: Is there an easy way to install gnome 3 and the latest packages in squeeze? Because that I can install. No. If you want GNOME3+gnome-shell, reconside

Re: getting gnome 3

2012-07-06 Thread Marc Shapiro
On 07/03/2012 06:47 AM, Camaleón wrote: On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 20:48:53 +0200, Kristoffer Gustafsson wrote: Is there an easy way to install gnome 3 and the latest packages in squeeze? Because that I can install. No. If you want GNOME3+gnome-shell, reconsider wheezy. Now that Wheezy is frozen (an

Re: getting gnome 3

2012-07-03 Thread Camaleón
On Mon, 02 Jul 2012 20:48:53 +0200, Kristoffer Gustafsson wrote: > Hi. (hi) No html posts, thanks. > Ok, I give up installing wheezy now, since it doesn't work. What's what does not work for you? > Is there an easy way to install gnome 3 and the latest packages in > squeeze? Because that I c