Re: gcc 2.8.1

1998-12-04 Thread wtopa
Subject: Re: gcc 2.8.1 Date: Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 09:50:25PM +0100 In reply to:J.H.M. Dassen Ray" Quoting J.H.M. Dassen Ray"([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > On Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 04:39:33 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Quoting J.H.M. Dassen Ray"([EMAI

Re: gcc 2.8.1

1998-12-02 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 04:39:33 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Quoting J.H.M. Dassen Ray"([EMAIL PROTECTED]): [regarding gcc 2.8.1] > > Why? We have EGCS. > > Yep, and slink is screwed up because of it. Congratulations on succeeding to raise my blood pressure. The problems we have in slink c

Re: gcc 2.8.1

1998-12-02 Thread wtopa
Subject: Re: gcc 2.8.1 Date: Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 12:49:57PM +0100 In reply to:J.H.M. Dassen Ray" Quoting J.H.M. Dassen Ray"([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > On Tue, Dec 01, 1998 at 23:17:32 +, Richard Deighton wrote: > > Is anyone working on debs for gcc 2.8.

Re: gcc 2.8.1

1998-12-02 Thread J.H.M. Dassen \(Ray\)
On Tue, Dec 01, 1998 at 23:17:32 +, Richard Deighton wrote: > Is anyone working on debs for gcc 2.8.1? There are debs of 2.8.1 in project/experimental. They're unsupported of course. > It'd be nice to have soon. Why? We have EGCS. Ray -- Cyberspace, a final frontier. These are the voyages

Re: gcc 2.8.1

1998-12-01 Thread Gary L. Hennigan
Richard Deighton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Is anyone working on debs for gcc 2.8.1? It'd be nice to have soon. It'd have to be an extra option, similiar to egcs, because Linus won't be upgrading anytime soon and he and some of the other kernel developers have reported problems compiling parts