On 12/20/05, Noah Dain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
any fuse filesystem will incur quite a bit of overhead. If you arelooking for high throughput, fuse is not what you want.
ok, i had read about this but anything than smbfs would be better!! ;-)
try using cifs. smbfs is deprecated. Both have their
On 12/19/05, fabrizio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi everybody.
> At the moment i'm using smbmount and smbfs utilities, but i'm not satisfied
> with this tool, cause using gnome with nautilus and browsing dirs or shares
> is really slow and not efficient.
> so i'm looking at fusefs + smbfs. is s
2 matches
Mail list logo
