Re: full control of connections

2008-05-07 Thread NN_il_Confusionario
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 04:58:08PM +, frits wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 08:12:26PM +0200, NN_il_Confusionario wrote: > > > * From: frits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >The idea of different users is not really usable. I use my systems to > > >work. > > Can you elaborate? > I read it as role-

Re: Re: full control of connections

2008-05-07 Thread frits
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 08:12:26PM +0200, NN_il_Confusionario wrote: > > * From: frits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >The idea of different users is not really usable. I use my systems to > >work. > > this is interesting: it is the first time that I hear about unix > multiuser capabilities (to run ap

Re: Re: full control of connections

2008-05-05 Thread NN_il_Confusionario
> * From: frits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >The idea of different users is not really usable. I use my systems to >work. this is interesting: it is the first time that I hear about unix multiuser capabilities (to run applications side by side as different users) being "not really usable". Can you el

Re: full control of connections

2008-05-05 Thread frits
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 09:28:03AM +0200, NN_il_Confusionario wrote: > > * From: frits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >allowed to include the applications in the firewall rules. > > man iptables in etch still shows > >owner >This module attempts to match various characteristics of the pac

Re: full control of connections

2008-05-04 Thread NN_il_Confusionario
> * From: frits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >allowed to include the applications in the firewall rules. man iptables in etch still shows owner This module attempts to match various characteristics of the packet creator, for locally- generated packets. besides, grep -i owner /