On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:35:41PM +0100, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 December 2007 09:54, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:27:22AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > > Many people seem to think that ftp.debian.org is the canonical location
> > > > of Debian packages and t
On Tuesday 04 December 2007 22:44, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:35:41PM +0100, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> > On Tuesday 04 December 2007 09:54, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:27:22AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > > > Many people seem to think that ftp.debi
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 09:35:41PM +0100, Thierry Chatelet wrote:
> On Tuesday 04 December 2007 09:54, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:27:22AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > > Many people seem to think that ftp.debian.org is the canonical location
> > > > of Debian packages and t
On Tuesday 04 December 2007 09:54, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:27:22AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > Many people seem to think that ftp.debian.org is the canonical location
> > > of Debian packages and that it will be best for them to use that site
> > > for apt or for mirrori
On 12/3/07, Daniel Burrows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Were you getting the same thing from apt-get commands?
I didn't try apt-get commands, actually.
>
> Daniel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:27:22AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Many people seem to think that ftp.debian.org is the canonical location of
> > Debian packages and that it will be best for them to use that site for apt
> > or for mirroring. This is *not true*.
> >
> > If you're using it now, pleas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/03/07 13:52, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're going to be changing ftp.debian.org setup a bit... but first,
> a friendly reminder.
>
> Many people seem to think that ftp.debian.org is the canonical location of
> Debian packages and that it wi
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:52:33PM -0800, David Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> On 12/3/07, David Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Previously:
>
>
> > OK, I got bitten and just checked my /etc/apt/sources.list, and
> > noticed all my debian references were to ftp.debian.org. I beg
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 09:33:52PM -0800, David Fox wrote:
> Fetched 23.8kB in 4s (5406B/s)
> Segmentation faultsts... 95%
> I'm going to clean /var/cache/apt/archives just in case.
This is better:
rm /var/cache/apt/*pkgcache.bin
--
Chi usa software non libero avvelena anche te. Digli di smette
On 12/3/07, David Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Previously:
> OK, I got bitten and just checked my /etc/apt/sources.list, and
> noticed all my debian references were to ftp.debian.org. I beg
> penance.
snip explanation and aptitude output.
Found what I think is the issue. I still had a few ft
On 12/3/07, Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're going to be changing ftp.debian.org setup a bit... but first,
> a friendly reminder.
OK, I got bitten and just checked my /etc/apt/sources.list, and
noticed all my debian references were to ftp.debian.org. I beg
penance.
So I swit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:15:55PM -0500, steve wrote:
>>
>> is ftp.debian.org down?, cant update or install anything last couple
>> hours... just get a timeout, but pings ok?
>
> ftp.debian.org is kept for historical reaso
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:15:55PM -0500, steve wrote:
>
>
> is ftp.debian.org down?, cant update or install anything last couple
> hours... just get a timeout, but pings ok?
ftp.debian.org is kept for historical reasons. You should switch to
ftp.us.debian.org (I'm guessing you are in the U
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:15:55PM -0500, steve wrote:
> is ftp.debian.org down?, cant update or install anything last couple
> hours... just get a timeout, but pings ok?
>From Chennai, India, I can confirm this.
(And unfortunately, the mirror in Chennai, India - ftp.iitm.ac.in -,
is also dow
"Thierry Chatelet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tanel Kokk wrote:
Thierry Chatelet wrote:
Mirror with debian-amd64 are from the past, and I guess, not updated.
Thierry
If so, then why ftp.debian.org's pool contains amd64 packages at all?
Tanel
That's a
Tanel Kokk wrote:
Thierry Chatelet wrote:
Mirror with debian-amd64 are from the past, and I guess, not updated.
Thierry
If so, then why ftp.debian.org's pool contains amd64 packages at all?
Tanel
That's a good question, and also, I did not notice that the packages
have exactly the same
Thierry Chatelet wrote:
Mirror with debian-amd64 are from the past, and I guess, not updated.
Thierry
If so, then why ftp.debian.org's pool contains amd64 packages at all?
Tanel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC
Tanel Kokk wrote:
Can somebody explain me, why screen packages on these sites differ by
size?
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/s/screen/screen_4.0.2-4.1_amd64.deb
size: 608816
ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian-amd64/debian/pool/main/s/screen/screen_4.0.2-4.1_amd64.deb
size: 599480
As I
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 09:26:35AM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> I haven't been able to connect for at least 12 hours.
Yes, it's down for power maintenance. See:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0112/msg02086.html
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Is ftp.debian.org down? is there a mailing list for the ftp admins?
> > I do a mirror of slink and potato i386.
>
> Yes, it seems so. I've been unable to connect since last night.
>
It's in the process of moving to a new server.
Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Lawrence Walton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is ftp.debian.org down? is there a mailing list for the ftp admins?
> I do a mirror of slink and potato i386.
Yes, it seems so. I've been unable to connect since last night.
--
Arcady Genkin
"I opened up my wallet, and it's full of blood..." - GsYDE
Thanks for the info, Dennis. I'll change my config accordingly.
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: dpk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 1998 7:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: Debian User List
> Subject: Re: ftp.debian.org
>
>
On Mon, 22 Jun 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I am perhaps asking this question in the wrong place, but here goes...
>
> I keep a local mirror of ftp.debian.org/pub/debian/dists/hamm for
> my personal use. I noticed a few messages about some sort of reorganization
> of some of the mirror sit
On Sun, 21 Jun 1998 09:57:50 -0400 (EDT), dpk wrote:
>I have turned off PARANOID for ftp... you should be able to get in
>now.
Thanks. Dunno why but some of the addresses for jps.net just don't
reverse well, others do. *shrug*
--
Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expresse
On Sun, 21 Jun 1998, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jun 1998 00:55:59 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>
> >Do either of these require reverse lookups on FTPs? I can't get in from
> >home, which currently is not resolving on reverse lookups. I can get in from
> >work, however.
>
> To answer my
On Sun, 21 Jun 1998 00:55:59 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>Do either of these require reverse lookups on FTPs? I can't get in from
>home, which currently is not resolving on reverse lookups. I can get in from
>work, however.
To answer my own question, both ftp.debian.org and ftp.us.debian.o
On Sat, Jun 20, 1998 at 08:13:18AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Jun 1998 00:49:16 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> >[12:47am] [EMAIL PROTECTED] telnet ftp.debian.org ftp
> >Trying 130.207.7.21...
> >Connected to santanni.cc.gatech.edu.
> >Escape character is '^]'.
> >220 santanni.cc.gatech.e
On Sat, 20 Jun 1998, dpk wrote:
> ftp.us.debian.org (debian.egr.msu.edu) had SCSI problems early today.
> An fsck did the job, and is now back in business! Thanks for your
> patience.
You know, I didn't even know we had an ftp.us.debian.org - could you
possibly make the archive available via HT
On Sat, 20 Jun 1998, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Anyone know what is up with these two sites? ftp.debian.org appears to
> be refusing connections and ftp.us.debian.org looks like the daemon is there
> but inactive. :/
ftp.us.debian.org (debian.egr.msu.edu) had SCSI problems early today.
An fsck did
On Sun, 21 Jun 1998 00:49:16 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>On Sat, Jun 20, 1998 at 07:41:49AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> >From the CLI:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# telnet ftp.debian.org ftp
>> Trying 130.207.7.21...
>> Connected to santanni.cc.gatech.edu.
>> Escape character is '^]'.
>> user anonymou
On Sat, Jun 20, 1998 at 07:41:49AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> >From the CLI:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# telnet ftp.debian.org ftp
> Trying 130.207.7.21...
> Connected to santanni.cc.gatech.edu.
> Escape character is '^]'.
> user anonymous
[12:47am] [EMAIL PROTECTED] telnet ftp.debian.org ftp
Trying 13
On Sat, 20 Jun 1998 10:30:39 -0400 (EDT), Colin Telmer wrote:
>I just got into ftp.debian.org fine. us didn't work however. Cheers.
>From dselect:
Using FTP to check directories...(stop with ^C)
Connecting to ftp.debian.org...
Failed to connect
Retry connection at once [y]:
>From the CLI:
[EMA
On Sat, 20 Jun 1998, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Anyone know what is up with these two sites? ftp.debian.org appears to
> be refusing connections and ftp.us.debian.org looks like the daemon is there
> but inactive. :/
I just got into ftp.debian.org fine. us didn't work however. Cheers.
--
Colin Te
On Thu, 2 Apr 1998, Arunas Norvaisa wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Does anybody of you know the reason why hamm/frozen is not
> mirrored at the mother-Sunsite and countless mirrors? It will
> be so much easier for European people to download the rought
> 300-350 MB of the distribution.
>
> Have wr
[ on European debian-mirrors ]
>
>
> Try:
>
> ftp.infomagic.com/pub/mirrors/linux/debian/dists/frozen/
Or in the Netherlands:
ftp.nl.net/site/ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/frozen/
Eric
--
E.L. Meijer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | tel. office +31 40 2472189
Eindhoven Univ. of Technology
On Sat, 28 Mar 1998, Randy Edwards wrote:
>I finally got my Linux box back up after motherboard problems and
> so the first thing I wanted to do was to update my old copy of hamm.
> However, when I ran dselect to grab updates I find that the package
> lists from ftp.debian.org are mangled or b
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Timothy Phan wrote:
: Hi,
:
: I've been doing mirror of off the ftp.cdrom.com for a while now.
: Yesterday, I've just found out that this site was not up to today.
: So I started to mirror from the ftp.debian.org. I found out that
: there were a lot of fil
I always execute mirror -T blar blar blar to sync the timestamp
before I do the actual mirror. Early this year, I lost 500MB because of
timestamp difference.
Timothy Phan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've been doing mirror of off the ftp.cdrom.com for a while now.
> Yesterday, I've just found ou
On Wed, 25 Jun 1997, George Bonser wrote:
>
> getting no response from ftp.debian.org ... any estimated uptime?
>
wildone# ping ftp.debian.org
PING santanni.cc.gatech.edu (130.207.7.21): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 130.207.7.21: icmp_seq=0 ttl=243 time=419.1 ms
64 bytes from 130.207.7.21: icmp
errr, make that 192.221.26.1 had too many IP addresses on this paper.
On Wed, 25 Jun 1997, George Bonser wrote:
>
> My traceroute gets as far as gateway1.gatech.edu (208.153.128.135) and
> dies there.
>
>
>
> > --- santanni.cc.gatech.edu ping statistics ---
> > 3 packets transmitted, 2 pa
My traceroute gets as far as gateway1.gatech.edu (208.153.128.135) and
dies there.
> --- santanni.cc.gatech.edu ping statistics ---
> 3 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 33% packet loss
> round-trip min/avg/max = 380.4/399.7/419.1 ms
>
>
>
> >
> > George Bonser
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED],
George Bonser wrote:
>
> errr, make that 192.221.26.1 had too many IP addresses on this
> paper.
>
> On Wed, 25 Jun 1997, George Bonser wrote:
>
> >
> > My traceroute gets as far as gateway1.gatech.edu (208.153.128.135)
> and
> > dies there.
> >
> >
> >
> > > --- santanni.cc.gatech.edu ping st
We recently decided to keep the master copy of the _entire_ WWW site on
master.debian.org, rather than just a portion of it as previously. This
meant that it would become very much larger. Rather than grow the mirror
sites 300 MB, we moved it to its own separate directory. If you wish to
mirror tha
In article <9609200946.AA22964@> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (J.H.M.Dassen) writes:
> > I maintain a mirror of ftp.debian.org for internal use (we've got several
> > linux machines), however, the last several times I've started to run
> > mirror its reported:
> >
> > compare directories (src 8356, dest 329
> I maintain a mirror of ftp.debian.org for internal use (we've got several
> linux machines), however, the last several times I've started to run
> mirror its reported:
>
> compare directories (src 8356, dest 32957)
>
> I'm not too keen on letting 3/4 of the mirror get toasted, so I've
> killed
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Has anyone noticed that today ftp.debian.org is being particularly vicious
> about booting people from the server?
Try debian.crosslink.net or one of the other mirrors. Ftp.debian.org is
having some problems with running out of file descriptors, etc. We
Hallo Martin!
}> We suggest you use the same mirror script we use, and set it so that if
}> more than 10% of files go away at once it won't delete them.
}
}Which one do you use? Where to get it? 10% seems reasonable.
It is the mirror program that is shipped with Debian, mirror 2.8 from
Lee McLaug
The mirror system we use is in the Debian net/mirror-2.8-6.deb package.
This is the well-known Perl mirror program. I think it requires Perl5
to run without great big memory leaks, but you should be able to take
the debian source/net/mirror-2.8-6.tar.gz archive and move that to any
platform that ru
Martin Konold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 17 Jun 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
>
> > We suggest you use the same mirror script we use, and set it so that if
> > more than 10% of files go away at once it won't delete them.
>
> Which one do you use? Where to get it? 10% seems reasonable.
Is
On Mon, 17 Jun 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> We suggest you use the same mirror script we use, and set it so that if
> more than 10% of files go away at once it won't delete them.
Which one do you use? Where to get it? 10% seems reasonable.
> We did have problems with debian.org - the system it wa
From: Martin Konold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 1.) I do not hink it is a good idea to mount the /pub areas on a heavily
> used ftp server via nfs. (especially performace wise)
This is currently done because of a hardware/driver problem. We'll get
that resolved eventually.
> 2.) A lot of simple mirro
51 matches
Mail list logo
