On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 04:31:54PM -0600, Pete Harlan wrote:
> > I leave gnomeicu running all the time and my process table get filled
> > with defunct gnomeicu processes. I have to stop/restart gnomeicu to get
> > rid of them.
>
> I've had this "fork: ..." message happen when I had only around 30
On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 12:08:54PM -0800, Angus D Madden wrote:
> Karsten M. Self, Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:28:18AM -0800:
> >
> > For a fork, I'd suspect you're out of user processes, though checking
> > other resource limits (generally memory and filehandles) is
> adviseable.
> >
> > There are
> "Pete" == Pete Harlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pete> Does anyone know how to increase the number of allowed
Pete> processes?
if you are running a 2.2 series kernel, you have to recompile the
kernel after tweaking a header file.
it's been a while, but I think you only have to change on
Karsten M. Self, Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 11:28:18AM -0800:
>
> For a fork, I'd suspect you're out of user processes, though checking
> other resource limits (generally memory and filehandles) is adviseable.
>
> There are hard-compiled limits of 256 user, and 512 system, processes,
> in the 2.2.x ke
on Sun, Mar 03, 2002, Balazs Javor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When I try to ssh from one of my Woody boxes into the other
> (using OpenSSH) I am able to connect but I get the following message:
>
> bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
>
> The same message then appears each time
On Sunday 03 March 2002 23:31, Pete Harlan wrote:
> > I leave gnomeicu running all the time and my process table get filled
> > with defunct gnomeicu processes. I have to stop/restart gnomeicu to get
> > rid of them.
>
> I've had this "fork: ..." message happen when I had only around 300
> processe
> I leave gnomeicu running all the time and my process table get filled
> with defunct gnomeicu processes. I have to stop/restart gnomeicu to get
> rid of them.
I've had this "fork: ..." message happen when I had only around 300
processes running. /proc/sys/kernel/threads-max is the only relevant
Hi,
Yes, indeed there have been a huge number of defunct sh processes...
It works now.
Many thanks again!
best regards,
Balazs
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 09:52:24AM -0500, Rick Pasotto wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 03:16:39PM +0100, Balazs Javor wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This is the output of free:
>>
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 03:16:39PM +0100, Balazs Javor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the output of free:
>
> total used free sharedbuffers cached
> Mem:222788 204144 18644 0 6984 83512
> -/+ buffers/cache: 113648 109140
Hi,
This is the output of free:
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:222788 204144 18644 0 6984 83512
-/+ buffers/cache: 113648 109140
Swap: 747012 93416 653596
>From this it seems to me that I s
On Sun, 3 Mar 2002 14:12:17 +0100, Balazs Javor wrote:
>
>Any ideas why this happens and how I could solve this?
>
You're out of memory. Add some swap.
--
Sign the EU petition against SPAM: L I N U X .~.
http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/The Choice /V\
E.L. Meijer \(Eric\) wrote:
> It looks as though your system runs out of pid's (unlikely), or you hit
> your maximum number of processes (not impossible). What does ulimit -a
> say about your max user processes? How many processes are running?
> (try top, or `ps ax').
>
> ps ax | wc -l
>
> Eric
>
> I've e Debian 2.0 frozen host with X windows and fvwm95.
> Now when I run a program and some windows are opened often I'm
> obtainig:
> xterm: Error 29, errno 11: Resource temporarily unavailable
> or when I attempting to run xterm:
> bash: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable
> and so
13 matches
Mail list logo
