Re: followup about LVM problems.

2005-12-09 Thread Kelly Harding
It appears that parted only supports 'detect' function for XFS partitions. Seems I'll have to look elsewhere for a solution I suspect then. Kelly begin:vcard fn:Miss Kelly Harding n:Harding;Kelly adr:;;UK email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard

Re: followup about LVM problems.

2005-12-09 Thread Kelly Harding
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Kelly Harding wrote: If you remember the approximate sizes/locations of the partitions, you can use parted to locate them. It is a bit iffy, but it has worked for me in the past. I've never used parted before. but the sizes/locations of the partition should be avai

Re: followup about LVM problems.

2005-12-09 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Kelly Harding wrote: > >> >> If you remember the approximate sizes/locations of the partitions, you >> can use parted to locate them. It is a bit iffy, but it has worked for >> me in the past. >> > > I've never used parted before. but the sizes/locations of the partition > should be > available

Re: followup about LVM problems.

2005-12-08 Thread Kelly Harding
If you remember the approximate sizes/locations of the partitions, you can use parted to locate them. It is a bit iffy, but it has worked for me in the past. I've never used parted before. but the sizes/locations of the partition should be available from LVM2's data I guess, shouldn't it?

Re: followup about LVM problems.

2005-12-08 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
Kelly Harding wrote: > Thanks to a few users help from various sources I've managed to fix the > problem with LVM2 I was > having. > > It was due to 2.6 series kernel not being used that caused the problems. > Downgrading to the version currently > in testing rather than the version in unstable se