Re: finding a tarball on a fat-less fat partition--disk editor? (fwd)

2000-09-19 Thread dochawk
Oswald opined, > well ... i don't remember their names. i found some of them by searching > freshmeat.net and doing a generic web search for "linux disk editor" *DOH!* Now I feel foolish :) > or > something like that. i did not bookmark them, as they all were not very > satisfactory ... :-(

Re: finding a tarball on a fat-less fat partition--disk editor? (fwd)

2000-09-18 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
> > i said, they suck, not that they are bad. this means, that they are not > > that simple to use as diskedit for dos and lack the one or other > > interesting feature - at least the last time i looked out half a year ago. > > ;-) > > For one-use once, i'll put up with almost anything. I assume

Re: finding a tarball on a fat-less fat partition--disk editor? (fwd)

2000-09-18 Thread dochawk
> > yikes, I can do without the gory details :) does this mean that once I > > find a block of a tar, I can start extracting, even if it wasn't the > > middle? > you mean "even if it wasn't the START?", right? > the answer is yes. just verified this. yes. Thanks. > > And now that I think of

Re: finding a tarball on a fat-less fat partition--disk editor?

2000-09-18 Thread dochawk
chris chryed, > On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 02:14:56PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > yikes, I can do without the gory details :) does this mean that once I > > find a block of a tar, I can start extracting, even if it wasn't the > > middle? > You want to find the first block of the tar. I

Re: finding a tarball on a fat-less fat partition--disk editor? (fwd)

2000-09-16 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
> yikes, I can do without the gory details :) does this mean that once I > find a block of a tar, I can start extracting, even if it wasn't the > middle? > you mean "even if it wasn't the START?", right? the answer is yes. just verified this. > And now that I think of it, someone mentioned tha

Re: finding a tarball on a fat-less fat partition--disk editor? (fwd)

2000-09-16 Thread dochawk
to: du reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED], debian-user@lists.debian.org from: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: finding a tarball on a fat-less fat partition--disk editor? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 15 Sep 2000 19:28:34 EDT." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL

Re: finding a tarball on a fat-less fat partition

2000-09-15 Thread Chris Gray
On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 01:00:38AM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > I guess that's the big question: what *is* the tar magic that I'm > > > according to /usr/share/misc/magic gnu tar archives contain the magic > "ustar". however, i found, that it's not at the beginning of the archive. > the

Re: finding a tarball on a fat-less fat partition

2000-09-15 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
> I guess that's the big question: what *is* the tar magic that I'm > according to /usr/share/misc/magic gnu tar archives contain the magic "ustar". however, i found, that it's not at the beginning of the archive. the archive starts with the name of the first archived file/directory padded with

Re: finding a tarball on a fat-less fat partition

2000-09-15 Thread hawk
> recover with dd. the better question is, how to find them. if you've > overwritten only the fat, than the problem is not that big: the fat is > used only to find the second and following clusters of a file; the first > cluster is stored in the directory, from which the file is referred to. > so

Re: finding a tarball on a fat-less fat partition

2000-09-15 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
> It was a brand new partition, and only two files should ever have been > written there (tars of /home and /etc), so I presume that they were > written continuously. > probably ... > Any suggestions on how to recover these? > recover with dd. the better question is, how to find them. if you'