Insane Boi wrote:
Unique question, Pidgin (aka gaim) has some configuration files. I
would like to have these configuration files remain
untouched/unmodified, but readable. I am running pidgin under a normal
user account. Here is what I tried:
chmod 004 file.xml
sudo chown root:root file.x
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 06:28:39PM -0300, Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
> El sáb, 10-11-2007 a las 12:04 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West escribió:
> > On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 02:34:34PM -0300, Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
...
> > > Anyway, after manually fixing all the permissions I could with your file
> > >
El sáb, 10-11-2007 a las 12:04 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West escribió:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 02:34:34PM -0300, Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
> > El vie, 09-11-2007 a las 09:31 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West escribió:
> > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:06:55PM -0300, Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
> > > > 2007/11
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 02:34:34PM -0300, Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
> El vie, 09-11-2007 a las 09:31 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West escribió:
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:06:55PM -0300, Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
> > > 2007/11/8, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at
El vie, 09-11-2007 a las 09:31 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West escribió:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:06:55PM -0300, Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
> > 2007/11/8, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:33:45PM -0300, Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > >
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 10:06:55PM -0300, Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
> 2007/11/8, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:33:45PM -0300, Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I ran 'chmod -R o-rwx .*' in /root and all permissions in /var and
> > > /tmp got
2007/11/8, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:33:45PM -0300, Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I ran 'chmod -R o-rwx .*' in /root and all permissions in /var and
> > /tmp got messed up (good luck I cancelled it before it could do more
> > damage). I man
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 08:33:45PM -0300, Gabriel Parrondo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I ran 'chmod -R o-rwx .*' in /root and all permissions in /var and
> /tmp got messed up (good luck I cancelled it before it could do more
> damage). I manually fixed some permissions so I could at least have a
> working
Douglas Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:10:30PM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 04:56:30 -0800
Freddy Freeloader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Freddy,
all aspects of the tools available, but all users still have execute
permissions there.
Why is this done? I
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 01:10:30PM +, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 04:56:30 -0800
> Freddy Freeloader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Freddy,
>
> > all aspects of the tools available, but all users still have execute
> > permissions there.
> > Why is this done? I can't real
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 06:02:37 -0800
Freddy Freeloader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Freddy,
> I beg to differ. From inside a regular user account run
> "/sbin/ifconfig -a" and see what you get. By including the absolute
> path to the command you bypass the necessity of having the command in
>
Brad Rogers wrote:
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 04:56:30 -0800
Freddy Freeloader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Freddy,
all aspects of the tools available, but all users still have execute
permissions there.
Why is this done? I can't really see a good reason for it. What am
I missing?
I
On Sun, 17 Dec 2006 04:56:30 -0800
Freddy Freeloader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Freddy,
> all aspects of the tools available, but all users still have execute
> permissions there.
> Why is this done? I can't really see a good reason for it. What am
> I missing?
I can't answer your quer
On 8/19/05, Niklas Schönberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Chris Purves wrote:
> > Is it possible to set up a directory so that a user can add a new
> > file, but once the file is there the same user cannot modify, rename,
> > or delete the file?
> >
> > The shared directory is a samba share, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris Purves wrote:
> Is it possible to set up a directory so that a user can add a new
> file, but once the file is there the same user cannot modify, rename,
> or delete the file?
>
> The shared directory is a samba share, and will only be accessed
Quoting Chris Purves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Is it possible to set up a directory so that a user can add a new
file, but once the file is there the same user cannot modify, rename,
or delete the file?
The shared directory is a samba share, and will only be accessed
through windows, so solving this
* Chris Purves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050818 06:01]:
> Is it possible to set up a directory so that a user can add a new
> file, but once the file is there the same user cannot modify, rename,
> or delete the file?
Not sure, but perhaps with "chattr +a "?
Yours sincerely,
Alexander
--
http://l
There was an Alias of /images to /usr/share/images in httpd.conf. This must
not be there by default in the unstable distro. Thanks Jacob. - John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 14:41:00 -0500
"John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:01:21 -0500
> "John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
[snip - problem with images not displaying on user's website]
>
> > Have you checked the error logs for apache? They usually provide
> >
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:01:21 -0500
"John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please bear with me - I had a working virtual host on Debian unstable
> and Apache 1.3.31 with web files in the user's /home/username/www/
> directory.(name-based virtual hosting). I had some problems and ended
> up re
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 12:01:21 -0500
"John Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please bear with me - I had a working virtual host on Debian unstable
> and Apache 1.3.31 with web files in the user's /home/username/www/
> directory.(name-based virtual hosting). I had some problems and ended
> up re
Title: RE: file permissions problem
Something is changing your permissions and I don't know what so try to investigate on that.
But you may want to look at the attrib command as well
Cheers
-Original Message-
From: Richard Kimber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 Dec
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 09:36:32PM -0800, John L. Fjellstad wrote:
> I'm running Debian 3.0 with custom Linux 2.4.19 kernel.
>
> I added this to /etc/devf/perms file:
> REGISTER ^scsi/host0/bus0/target6/lun0/generic$ PERMISSIONS root.cdrom
> 0660
>
> Still, whenever I reboot the system, the gener
> "Dave" == Dave Sherohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Dave> On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 05:20:29PM +0100, Alexis Kotte
Dave> wrote:
>> movemail: Permission denied for /var/mail/kotte
Dave> What does `ls -l /var/mail/kotte` show as the file's owner?
Dave> File permissions acro
Dave Sherohman wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 05:20:29PM +0100, Alexis Kotte wrote:
> > movemail: Permission denied for /var/mail/kotte
>
> What does `ls -l /var/mail/kotte` show as the file's owner? File
> permissions across NFS only work if your UID is the same on both
> machines or you
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 05:20:29PM +0100, Alexis Kotte wrote:
> movemail: Permission denied for /var/mail/kotte
What does `ls -l /var/mail/kotte` show as the file's owner? File
permissions across NFS only work if your UID is the same on both
machines or you run an additional daemon (whose name es
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 03:39:47PM +0100, Martin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Whenever I mount a filesystem (Woody) without file permissions (like
> vfat, iso9660), all files are marked as executable -- this is quite
> annoying because then the syntax highlighting on the console is irritating.
>
> I think
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 10:28:21PM -0800, Mike Egglestone wrote:
> Hi all...
> I've been working all day on this one and can't figure it out
> maybe you can help...
>
> say I have a folder like so..
> /var/www/
>
> I want to set the permissions so that the "owner" and "group" have
> read
on Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 04:23:09PM +, Jan Warnking ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> Stupid me, I inadvertently changed the permissions for all of the device
> files on my potato box to 660. How do I get them back to their initial
> state? I didn't find any documentation on t
On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 04:23:09PM +, Jan Warnking wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> Stupid me, I inadvertently changed the permissions for all of the device
> files on my potato box to 660. How do I get them back to their initial
> state? I didn't find any documentation on the default file permi
On Sun, Jul 09, 2000 at 06:01:08PM +0200, Sven Burgener wrote:
> Hi all
>
> What should be the permissions of the log files located in /var/log?
> Where could I find out such a thing if something has changed
> unexpectedly / unintendedly?
>
> I am unsure because I think I *might* have changed som
On 03-Dec-1999, Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When copying a CD to a writable CD the source file gets mounted
> read-only, i.e. all files do not have a write flag set. Writing this
> image to a new CD results in a corrupt copy. How to change this
> behaviour? I'm using gtoast
On Fri, Dec 03, 1999 at 01:12:23AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When copying a CD to a writable CD the source file gets mounted
> read-only, i.e. all files do not have a write flag set. Writing this
> image to a new CD results in a corrupt copy. How to change this
> behaviour? I'm using
Antonio,
I got some links that may help you:
http://olympic.atmos.colostate.edu/basic_unix.html
http://php.iupui.edu/~kcmcreyn/L401/Unix/file_perm.html
http://menaik.cs.ualberta.ca/doc/Talks/Unix/file_permissions.html
http://www.msoe.edu/personal/workshop/9603/adv/unix/permissions.html
setting the sgid bit (that +s you see) makes sure all files in that
directory are created with ownership of that group. debian uses that in a
lot of places.
nate
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
arodri >While checking some files with ls -l, I have found some permission
arodri >se
On Fri, 26 Nov 1999, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> While checking some files with ls -l, I have found some permission
> settings such as:
> drwx--S---
> drwxr-sr-x
>
> I have not seen anywhere documentation on settings other than r,w,x. Can
> you tell where I can find their meaning? Would be great
Hello,
> I LOOK FOR A COMMAND THAT SETS THE PERMISSIONS OF ONE FILE LIKE THE
> PERMISSIONS
> OF ANOTHER FILE.
Oh please don't shout.
> This is analogous to the touch command that sets the timestamps of one file
> like another file,
> touch -r file-template file-target
OK, I did apropos m
On Sun, Nov 22, 1998 at 5:39PM -0500, Jameson Burt wrote:
> This is analogous to the touch command that sets the timestamps of one file
> like another file,
> touch -r file-template file-target
>
> Of course, one can go through machinations like
>cp -p file-template file-target
>cp
38 matches
Mail list logo
