op 16-07-14 18:11, Dylan Bass schreef:
> I noticed fglrx-driver has been removed only from the jessie repos. Any
> reason why?
It does not work with the latest Xorg:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=754249
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=753781#88
With regards,
On 16/07/14 12:11 PM, Dylan Bass wrote:
I noticed fglrx-driver has been removed only from the jessie repos.
Any reason why?
The fglrx driver is closed source. AMD have to provide one for for each
version of X. If they haven't updated their driver, the Debian
maintainers can't provide it.
On Wed, 16 Jul 2014 10:11:12 -0600
Dylan Bass wrote:
> I noticed fglrx-driver has been removed only from the jessie
> repos. Any reason why?
This is the way testing's working, re-read Debian docs.
--
the Lord doesn't touch many people nowadays…
priests take care of that for him
signature.
On 2013-10-05 18:49 +0200, Enrico Polesel wrote:
> I've just install debian jessie on a notebook and I'm not able to
> install fglrx-driver (there are only the legacy version)
>
> According to packages.debian.org[1] that packages is not longer
> available on jessie and I don't want to download it
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Gary Dale wrote:
> The open source drivers work better (in terms of integration with the X
> server) because the maintainers can adjust them to the latest changes in X
> and other graphic software. Unfortunately due to the problems noted above,
> they can't keep u
On 12/10/12 04:05 PM, Roman V.Leon. wrote:
On 12.10.2012 23:13, Steven Rosenberg wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Darac
Marjal wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:43:32PM +0400, Roman V.Leon. wrote:
Gents and Ladies :-) please advise.
I have an HP notebook with Ati Radeon 4200 GPU on bo
On 12.10.2012 23:13, Steven Rosenberg wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Darac Marjal wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:43:32PM +0400, Roman V.Leon. wrote:
Gents and Ladies :-) please advise.
I have an HP notebook with Ati Radeon 4200 GPU on board and
sometimes i like to play old good wi
On 12/10/12 03:13 PM, Steven Rosenberg wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Darac Marjal wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:43:32PM +0400, Roman V.Leon. wrote:
Gents and Ladies :-) please advise.
I have an HP notebook with Ati Radeon 4200 GPU on board and
sometimes i like to play old good w
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Darac Marjal wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:43:32PM +0400, Roman V.Leon. wrote:
>> Gents and Ladies :-) please advise.
>>
>> I have an HP notebook with Ati Radeon 4200 GPU on board and
>> sometimes i like to play old good windows games with help of "wine"
>> w
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:43:32PM +0400, Roman V.Leon. wrote:
> Gents and Ladies :-) please advise.
>
> I have an HP notebook with Ati Radeon 4200 GPU on board and
> sometimes i like to play old good windows games with help of "wine"
> while my little daughter is sleeping. But recently a real dis
Hi Paul,
I faced the same problem of blinking cursor when using the below 3
different drivers :
fglrx-driver 1:12-6~beta-1
amd-driver-installer-12-4-x86.x86_64.run
amd-driver-installer-12-3-x86.x86_64.run
I then followed Issam's recommendation as below to workaround the issue and got
a g
Le 03/05/2010 22:49, Carlos Miranda Molina (Mstaaravin) wrote:
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:43 AM, tv.deb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi, what exactly is broken ?
As a workaround you could use Sid packages if Squeeze's are in bad shape. I
have two mostly Squeeze (amd64, kde with desktop "effects" ena
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 9:43 AM, tv.deb...@googlemail.com
wrote:
> Hi, what exactly is broken ?
> As a workaround you could use Sid packages if Squeeze's are in bad shape. I
> have two mostly Squeeze (amd64, kde with desktop "effects" enabled) machines
> running Sid's fglrx at the moment and they s
Le 03/05/2010 11:43, Camaleón a écrit :
On Mon, 03 May 2010 01:48:02 -0400, Zachary Uram wrote:
This sucks. Stupid closed source drivers cause such problems. Any
workaround I can do?
I need to build the fglrx driver for debian squeeze (ati radeon hd 4550
card), but I just saw this bug
saying t
On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 1:48 AM, Zachary Uram wrote:
> This sucks. Stupid closed source drivers cause such problems.
Agreed. Specifically, the fglrx driver. I don't have problems with nvidia,
but when fglrx-9-12 came out, it broke compiz, so I reinstalled 9-11, and
put it on hold. I haven't upgr
On Mon, 03 May 2010 01:48:02 -0400, Zachary Uram wrote:
> This sucks. Stupid closed source drivers cause such problems. Any
> workaround I can do?
>
> I need to build the fglrx driver for debian squeeze (ati radeon hd 4550
> card), but I just saw this bug
> saying the packages have been removed f
On 2010-02-24 13:39 +0100, Zachary Uram wrote:
> I need to build the fglrx driver for debian squeeze (ati radeon hd
> 4550 card), but I just saw this bug saying packages removed from
> testing:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=56
>
> So the packages referred to here: http://w
> > I just tried it in my Thinkpad Z61M (Mobile X1400) and it seems to be
> > working well in 2D.
> >
> > Anthony
>
> I've switch from vesa to the radonhd driver and it worked instantly on
> my Z61p/FireGL5200.
> Although I cannot see a difference.
>
> Does anyone have success/experience with any d
Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 03 Dec 2007, Bruno Voigt wrote:
>
>> robin putters wrote:
>>
>>> Not yet, but work has started on 2D acceleration, and the driver is
>>> developing rapidly. In a couple of months(weeks?) time, you will have
>>> much better driver than vesa ever was, and probably
On 03 Dec 2007, Bruno Voigt wrote:
> robin putters wrote:
> > Not yet, but work has started on 2D acceleration, and the driver is
> > developing rapidly. In a couple of months(weeks?) time, you will have
> > much better driver than vesa ever was, and probably better in 2D than
> > fglrx. And you wi
robin putters wrote:
> Not yet, but work has started on 2D acceleration, and the driver is
> developing rapidly. In a couple of months(weeks?) time, you will have
> much better driver than vesa ever was, and probably better in 2D than
> fglrx. And you will be doing the radeonhd driver developers a
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> Bruno Voigt wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> the newer fglrx-driver 8.43.2-1 doesn't anymore detect my
>> Thinkpad Z61p FireGL5200 graphics.
>>
>> The last working version was 8.40.4-2,
>> which unfortunately doesn't work with linux kernel 2.6.23.x ..
>>
>> What is this cause, wha
Bruno Voigt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the newer fglrx-driver 8.43.2-1 doesn't anymore detect my
> Thinkpad Z61p FireGL5200 graphics.
>
> The last working version was 8.40.4-2,
> which unfortunately doesn't work with linux kernel 2.6.23.x ..
>
> What is this cause, what can I do about it?
>
> TIA,
>
On 12/3/07, Bruno Voigt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> robin putters wrote:
> > On 12/3/07, Bruno Voigt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> the newer fglrx-driver 8.43.2-1 doesn't anymore detect my
> >> Thinkpad Z61p FireGL5200 graphics.
> >>
> >> The last working version was 8.40.4-2,
> >> which unf
robin putters wrote:
> On 12/3/07, Bruno Voigt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> the newer fglrx-driver 8.43.2-1 doesn't anymore detect my
>> Thinkpad Z61p FireGL5200 graphics.
>>
>> The last working version was 8.40.4-2,
>> which unfortunately doesn't work with linux kernel 2.6.23.x ..
>>
>> Fire
On 12/3/07, Bruno Voigt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the newer fglrx-driver 8.43.2-1 doesn't anymore detect my
> Thinkpad Z61p FireGL5200 graphics.
>
> The last working version was 8.40.4-2,
> which unfortunately doesn't work with linux kernel 2.6.23.x ..
>
FireGL cards are still not supported wit
Kaloyan M. Penev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have been having a ton of grief with my fglrx driver and the fact that
> it requires libstdc++5, so I was quite excited to see that a new driver is
> available. However, when I try to run their installer to build a debian
> package:
>
> sh ./ati-driver-installe
Hello Marko.
Marko Randjelovic, 14.01.2007 18:25:
> My original post was about Ati proprietary fglrx driver. Then Mathias
> proposed free radeon driver, but with it also no direct rendering.
Sorry I couldn’t help you anymore.
> Since
> this driver is free software, maybe I should file a bug repo
My original post was about Ati proprietary fglrx driver. Then Mathias
proposed free radeon driver, but with it also no direct rendering. Since
this driver is free software, maybe I should file a bug report about
this? My Etch system is fully upgraded.
I am not sure if it's a bug of xorg driver
Mathias Brodala wrote:
Is this module loaded? If it is not, then adding it to /etc/modules
might be enough.
It is linked statically. Also, module radeon is loaded.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -r
2.6.18-3-amd64
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ grep CONFIG_AGP /boot/config-2.6.18-3-amd64
CONFIG_AGP=y
CONFIG_AG
Why not use the fglrx package, It works fine on my Radeon 9600
Sjoerd
Mathias Brodala wrote:
> Hello Marko.
>
> Marko Randjelovic, 03.01.2007 11:14:
>> Mathias Brodala wrote:
DESCRIPTION radeon is an Xorg driver for ATI RADEON based video
cards. It
contains […] hardware 3D ac
Hello Marko.
Marko Randjelovic, 03.01.2007 11:14:
> Mathias Brodala wrote:
>>> DESCRIPTION radeon is an Xorg driver for ATI RADEON based video
>>> cards. It
>>> contains […] hardware 3D acceleration (experimental on R300 and R400
>>> series
>>> cards),
>>>
>>
>> (From the radeon manpage.
Mathias Brodala wrote:
The Gentoo is outdated then:
DESCRIPTION radeon is an Xorg driver for ATI RADEON based video cards. It
contains […] hardware 3D acceleration (experimental on R300 and R400 series
cards),
(From the radeon manpage.)
My Radeon 9600 has an RV350 chip.
And
Hello Marko.
Marko Randjelovic, 02.01.2007 22:17:
> Mathias Brodala wrote:
>> Could you try the radeon driver? I’m not much experienced with fglrx since
>> I haven’t used it for ages.
>>
>> What is the output of the following commands after you changed to radeon?
>>
>> $ lsmod | grep radeon $ l
Mathias Brodala wrote:
Could you try the radeon driver? I’m not much experienced with fglrx since I
haven’t used it for ages.
What is the output of the following commands after you changed to radeon?
$ lsmod | grep radeon
$ lsof /dev/dri/card0
Regards, Mathias
All right, but I am not sure if
Hello Marko.
Marko Randjelovic, 02.01.2007 18:15:
>> Not sure about amd64, but Direct Rendering works with 9600 on my machine.
>> (Running i386.) Could you attach your /etc/X11/xorg.conf and
>> /var/log/Xorg.0.log
> I attached the files.
Could you try the radeon driver? I’m not much experienced w
Mathias Brodala wrote:
Install the debhelper package.
This helped to make packages, however even when upgrading with them,
again no xv and no dri.
Not sure about amd64, but Direct Rendering works with 9600 on my machine.
(Running i386.) Could you attach your /etc/X11/xorg.conf and /var/log/X
Hello Marko.
Marko Randjelovic, 02.01.2007 16:57:
> With fglrx-driver package from debian, I didn't have direct rendering,
> and xv did not work, so I have downloaded
> ati-driver-installer-8.32.5-x86.x86_64.run from Ati site. However,
> building of Debian package fails
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# s
T wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:29:47 +0200, Christian Christmann wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to install the fglrx driver for my
>> ATI card on my Etch system with Xorg 7.
>
> me too, Etch system with Xorg 7.
>
>> After installing the packages
>> module-assistant, fglrx-driver and fglrx-kernel-sr
On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 19:29:47 +0200, Christian Christmann wrote:
> I'm trying to install the fglrx driver for my
> ATI card on my Etch system with Xorg 7.
me too, Etch system with Xorg 7.
> After installing the packages
> module-assistant, fglrx-driver and fglrx-kernel-src
> and running 'aticonfi
40 matches
Mail list logo
