On Wed, 04 Apr 2001, Tony Crawford wrote:
> Henrique M Holschuh wrote (on 4 Apr 2001, at 9:48):
>
> > Well, it is not a security update, and it has about 90%
> > chance of causing headaches, since the new
> > initscript/ppp-scripts scheme will force the user to do some
> > manual configuration.
>
Henrique M Holschuh wrote (on 4 Apr 2001, at 9:48):
> Well, it is not a security update, and it has about 90%
> chance of causing headaches, since the new
> initscript/ppp-scripts scheme will force the user to do some
> manual configuration.
>
> I don't think it should go in stable.
Considering
On Tue, 03 Apr 2001, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:50:23PM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> > On Wed, 04 Apr 2001, David Jardine wrote:
> > > I recently re-installed a slink system from scratch on my
> > [...]
> > > Fetchmail dies with something like the following:
> >
> > S
on Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 03:18:48AM +0200, David Jardine ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I recently re-installed a slink system from scratch on my
> home computer (I'm no expert) after a failed attempt to install
> potato, but can no longer get incoming mail.
>
> Fetchmail dies with something like t
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:50:23PM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Apr 2001, David Jardine wrote:
> > I recently re-installed a slink system from scratch on my
> [...]
> > Fetchmail dies with something like the following:
>
> Speaking as the fetchmail maintainer, get a new version.
On Wed, 04 Apr 2001, David Jardine wrote:
> I recently re-installed a slink system from scratch on my
[...]
> Fetchmail dies with something like the following:
Speaking as the fetchmail maintainer, get a new version. The fetchmail in
slink is full of segfaults. Same goes to the one in potato. The
6 matches
Mail list logo
