-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/17/07 13:51, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:11:18AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 04/17/07 10:23, Kevin Mark wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> my setup uses fetchmail, exim4 and procmail
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:11:18AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/17/07 10:23, Kevin Mark wrote:
> [snip]
> > my setup uses fetchmail, exim4 and procmail. this is my understanding.
> > pop3 server
> > \/
> > fetchmail
> > \/
> > exim4
> >
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 03:26:40PM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> Michael Pobega:
> >
> > Well the last thing I need is to get procmail working, if I can't I
> > may end up just abandoning Debian altogether (I'm not threatening it,
> > but it's just really annoying, and I NEED procmail, it's not ev
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/17/07 10:23, Kevin Mark wrote:
[snip]
> my setup uses fetchmail, exim4 and procmail. this is my understanding.
> pop3 server
> \/
> fetchmail
> \/
> exim4
> \/
> mail spool
> \/
> exim4
> \/
> procmail
> \/
> ~/Maildir's
Why exim4-
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 06:37:23AM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:32:56AM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> Well the last thing I need is to get procmail working, if I can't I
> may end up just abandoning Debian altogether (I'm not threatening it,
> but it's just really annoy
Michael Pobega wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:39:56PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/16/07 18:33, Michael Pobega wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 05:57:05PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Pobega:
>
> Well the last thing I need is to get procmail working, if I can't I
> may end up just abandoning Debian altogether (I'm not threatening it,
> but it's just really annoying, and I NEED procmail, it's not even a
> "nice thing to use", I NEED it).
/me too.
> I really don't get w
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:32:56AM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> Michael Pobega:
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:39:56PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >>
> >> Is ssmtp a daemon? Maybe you need to restart it. Have you tried
> >> looking in /var/log/mail.log?
> >
> > There doesn't seem to be a daemo
Michael Pobega:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:39:56PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>> Is ssmtp a daemon? Maybe you need to restart it. Have you tried
>> looking in /var/log/mail.log?
>
> There doesn't seem to be a daemon for it.
I *think* fetchmail can use any sendmail-compatible binary
(/usr/b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/16/07 18:55, Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:39:56PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
>> Ah, right. Sorry.
>>
>> Is ssmtp a daemon? Maybe you need to restart it. Have you tried
>> looking in /var/log/mail.log?
>>
>
> There
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 04:55:24PM -0700, Jeff D wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Michael Pobega wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 04:39:30PM -0700, Jeff D wrote:
> >>On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Michael Pobega wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:44:25PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Michael Pobega wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 04:39:30PM -0700, Jeff D wrote:
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Michael Pobega wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:44:25PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:26:28PM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
I'm having tro
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:39:56PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/16/07 18:33, Michael Pobega wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 05:57:05PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >> On 04/16/07
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 04:39:30PM -0700, Jeff D wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Michael Pobega wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:44:25PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >>On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:26:28PM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
> >>>I'm having trouble fetching my mail with fetchma
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/16/07 18:33, Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 05:57:05PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 04/16/07 17:26, Michael Pobega wrote:
>>> I'm having trouble fetching my mail with fetc
On Mon, 16 Apr 2007, Michael Pobega wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:44:25PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:26:28PM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
I'm having trouble fetching my mail with fetchmail. All it does it say:
===
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 05:57:05PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/16/07 17:26, Michael Pobega wrote:
> > I'm having trouble fetching my mail with fetchmail. All it does it say:
> >
> > =
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:44:25PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:26:28PM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
> > I'm having trouble fetching my mail with fetchmail. All it does it say:
> >
> > ==
> >
> > 9
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/16/07 17:26, Michael Pobega wrote:
> I'm having trouble fetching my mail with fetchmail. All it does it say:
>
> ==
>
> 9 messages for [EMAIL PROTECTED] at pop.gmail.com (36283 oct
On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 06:26:28PM -0400, Michael Pobega wrote:
> I'm having trouble fetching my mail with fetchmail. All it does it say:
>
> ==
>
> 9 messages for [EMAIL PROTECTED] at pop.gmail.com (36283 octets).
> reading message
>Latest versions from Sid seem broken:
>1. pid files are not created
>2. EHLO syntax errors so connections not made, fail not fetched
>
>Any information on this? Fix?
Latest upgrade, 3rd in as many days, no better.
The 2nd problem may be due to exim4 which is the smtp server. This was also
recent
On Mon, 2006-01-16 at 22:50 +0200, David Baron wrote:
> Latest versions from Sid seem broken:
Since you didn't mention exactly which version that it, I'm guessing
it's v6.3.1-4? (I upgraded on Friday, and it still has version
6.2.5.4-1.
> 1. pid files are not created
> 2. EHLO syntax errors so c
Thedore Knab, 2002-Jan-29 01:26 -0500:
> Any ideas ?
>
> .fetmailrc
> set no bouncemail
> poll pop.washcoll.edu with proto pop3
> user 'ted.knab' there is 'ted' here
Try designating an 'mda' on your local machine for fetchmail
to hand off the email to.
add to the .fetchmailrc:
mda 'mai
On 01/13/02 01:07:05 -0800, Dmitriy wrote:
> On a retreival of a certain message server drops connection.
>
> You have to go into webmail account (which may be inaccesible for
> around 10 mins or so after attempt), and move all messages to a
> different folder. Then go through all of them until u
On 01/13/02 00:38:08 -0800, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Setup a system-wide /etc/fetchmailrc file. See the stuff at the top of
> /etc/init.d/fetchmail.
I saw the instructions there and placed a system-wide config file
under /etc, but it didn't look like it was working. There was no
feedback when I star
On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 10:11:35PM -0800, Mark Wagnon wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> Well fetchmail seems to be acting up on me here. I'm running 5.9.6-2,
> and haven't figured out how to run it as a system wide daemon yet, so
> I'm still doing the fetchmail -d 300 when I log in. Anyway, for some
> reason i
Mark Wagnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi all-
>
> Well fetchmail seems to be acting up on me here. I'm running 5.9.6-2,
> and haven't figured out how to run it as a system wide daemon yet,
Setup a system-wide /etc/fetchmailrc file. See the stuff at the top of
/etc/init.d/fetchmail.
> so I
[Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:03:03AM +0530] Sridhar M.A. :
> should I file a bug report ? How do I go about it ?
This bug might have already been reported. There is this nifty utility
based on Python called as 'reportbug'. It does what it says and helps
you find out whether the 'bug' has al
"Matthew Sackman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I would love to know of the details in the .fetchmailrc file of anyone
> who
> is successfully selecting emails for themselves that are part of a
> mailing
> list (or any other information that could help!).
OK Matthew - I subscribe to a number of
Lazarus Long wrote:
> On Monday, May 24, 1999 at 17:07:37 -0500, Brian Servis wrote:
> > Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > X-UIDL: 750f5ce8b238693f85cd478f9c87c1f0
>
> > > How did you search the archives? Do you have a working URL for this
> > > handy? I just filed a bug against www.debian
On Monday, May 24, 1999 at 17:07:37 -0500, Brian Servis wrote:
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-UIDL: 750f5ce8b238693f85cd478f9c87c1f0
> > How did you search the archives? Do you have a working URL for this
> > handy? I just filed a bug against www.debian.org since the link from
> > th
*- On 24 May, Lazarus Long wrote about "List archives? was: Re: fetchmail
problems"
> On Thursday, May 20, 1999 at 11:17:01 -0500, Matt Garman wrote:
> > Subject: Re: fetchmail problems
> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > X-UIDL: 685403a47c42011da0b
Subject: Re: fetchmail problems
Date: Thu, May 20, 1999 at 11:17:01AM -0500
In reply to:Matt Garman
Quoting Matt Garman([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 09:10:03AM -0500, Marc Mongeon wrote:
> > Make sure you have a line like this in your /etc/
On Thursday, May 20, 1999 at 11:17:01 -0500, Matt Garman wrote:
> Subject: Re: fetchmail problems
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> X-UIDL: 685403a47c42011da0baee50b375ebfe
>
> Also, I read through the fetchmail FAQ, and searched the debian-user
> list archives.
On Sat, 22 May 1999, XRDLAB wrote:
> Hi,
> I upgraded my hamm system to slink. Everything went well. The old
> configurations generated by ppconfig run equally well under the new
> system also. But I am having some trouble with regard to getting the
> mail from my isp. This has happened after upgra
On Thu, May 20, 1999 at 09:10:03AM -0500, Marc Mongeon wrote:
> Make sure you have a line like this in your /etc/exim.conf:
>
> local_domains = localhost
Yup, I have that in my /etc/exim.conf
>
> And one like this in your /etc/hosts:
>
> 127.0.0.1 localhost
Mine actually looks lik
Hello,
I have a fairly fresh slink system, and I get the same fetchmail error msgs.
--David
> -Original Message-
> From: XRDLAB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, May 22, 1999 5:19 AM
> To: Debian Users
> Subject: Fetchmail problems
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I upgraded my hamm system to slin
On 20-May-99 Matt Garman wrote:
> Also -- I'm running Exim, and have been for quite a while. I did a
> little snooping on DejaNews, and folks usually say that sendmail needs
> to be running... I don't have a sendmail process, but does exim
> create one anyway?
I am not running Sendmail, just E
38 matches
Mail list logo
