Re: fetchmail and mutt

2002-12-19 Thread Jeff
Paul Scott, 2002-Dec-19 12:32 -0700: > How does it "give it"? How does tell the Procmail configuration how to > find it? I have similar questions about the rest of the steps below. I > have actually read a lot about this and still don't have answers to some > of the basics. Here's a good ~/.

Re: fetchmail and mutt

2002-12-19 Thread Paul Scott
Stephen Gran wrote: This one time, at band camp, Paul Scott said: Are you a musician? I play flute, clarinet, and sax. I thought I read in some exim doc that exim doesn't filter. It doesn't exactly filter, more like sort. Exim is a mail transport agent, and can transport your mail to wh

Re: fetchmail and mutt

2002-12-19 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, Paul Scott said: > So I need (if I want good filtering): > ISP -> fetchmail -> procmail -> exim -> mutt That is one good way. > I thought I read in some exim doc that exim doesn't filter. It doesn't exactly filter, more like sort. Exim is a mail transport agent, and

Re: fetchmail and mutt

2002-12-19 Thread Paul Scott
Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: -- Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Thursday, 19 December 2002, 01:02 PM -0700): Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: Huh. Last I checked I'm running mutt without exim -- I'm using postfix. I was referring to installing. Mutt depends on exim or an

Re: fetchmail and mutt

2002-12-19 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
-- Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Thursday, 19 December 2002, 01:02 PM -0700): > Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > > >-- Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > >(on Thursday, 19 December 2002, 10:26 AM -0700): > > > >>Jean-Marc V. Liotier wrote: > >> > >>>A quite "classical" config is to

Re: fetchmail and mutt

2002-12-19 Thread Paul Scott
Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: -- Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Thursday, 19 December 2002, 10:26 AM -0700): Jean-Marc V. Liotier wrote: A quite "classical" config is to use fetchmail to bring your emails onto your local mail engine, then use any MUA you please (mutt, pine are

Re: fetchmail and mutt

2002-12-19 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
-- Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Thursday, 19 December 2002, 12:32 PM -0700): > Jeff wrote: > >Paul Scott, 2002-Dec-19 10:26 -0700: > >>Jean-Marc V. Liotier wrote: > >>>A quite "classical" config is to use fetchmail to bring your emails onto > >>>your local mail engine, then use any MUA

Re: fetchmail and mutt

2002-12-19 Thread Paul Scott
Jeff wrote: Paul Scott, 2002-Dec-19 10:26 -0700: Jean-Marc V. Liotier wrote: A quite "classical" config is to use fetchmail to bring your emails onto your local mail engine, then use any MUA you please (mutt, pine are happy to use your favorite editor). Can you be more specific

Re: fetchmail and mutt

2002-12-19 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
-- Paul Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Thursday, 19 December 2002, 10:26 AM -0700): > Jean-Marc V. Liotier wrote: > >A quite "classical" config is to use fetchmail to bring your emails onto > >your local mail engine, then use any MUA you please (mutt, pine are happy > >to > >use your favorite

Re: fetchmail and mutt

2002-12-19 Thread Jeff
Paul Scott, 2002-Dec-19 10:26 -0700: > Jean-Marc V. Liotier wrote: > > >A quite "classical" config is to use fetchmail to bring your emails onto > >your local mail engine, then use any MUA you please (mutt, pine are happy > >to > >use your favorite editor). > > > Can you be more specific about "l