Re: fdisk problem

2000-05-15 Thread Werner Reisberger
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 03:04:30PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > I've found that I get best results when I set the disk, in the BIOS, > > to standard translation, rather than to LBA or Large. After replacing util-linux v. 2.7.1-3 with v. 2.10.f-5 (and therefore replacing fdisk) the proble

Re: fdisk problem

2000-05-15 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
> I've found that I get best results when I set the disk, in the BIOS, > to standard translation, rather than to LBA or Large. > same for me. that way i get 25000+ cylinders, but it works. it depends heavily on the disk. i have one from fujitsu. -- Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your

Re: fdisk problem

2000-05-15 Thread Roso Giuseppe \(Beppe\)
I suggest to use a partition manager (that run under Dos) and I found on net recently (I haven't really try it, just a look, because my PC is stable now). It seems to support very large HD. You can find it at http://www.uni-bonn.de/~uzsv20/ It has a boot manager too and can create Extend and swa

Re: fdisk problem

2000-05-15 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
PS : I should add that I've not an awful lot of experience installing Debian, since I don't have hardware to experiment with. I've only installed on three or four different computers. (quite a few times, but only on those few machines.)

Re: fdisk problem

2000-05-15 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
I've found that I get best results when I set the disk, in the BIOS, to standard translation, rather than to LBA or Large. -- I am karlheg of deB-ORG. You will be freed. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Karl M. Hegbloom) Portland, OR USA Debian GNU Potato Linux 2.2 AMD K6-200(@233) XEmacs-21.2beta

Re: fdisk problem

2000-05-14 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
> Maybe it isn't a problem, but fdisk complains about overlapping areas if > I make a partition check (v): > > Warning: partition 10 overlaps partition 11. > Warning: partition 10 overlaps partition 12. > Warning: partition 11 overlaps partition 12. > 578832 unallocated sectors > oops. that's in

Re: fdisk problem

2000-05-14 Thread Werner Reisberger
On Sat, May 13, 2000 at 08:13:03PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > /dev/sdb111024 1061 1085 200781 82 Linux swap > > /dev/sdb121024 1086 1115 240943+ 83 Linux native > > > > I deleted partition 11 and 12 but after creating a new partition starting > >

Re: fdisk problem

2000-05-13 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
> /dev/sdb111024 1061 1085 200781 82 Linux swap > /dev/sdb121024 1086 1115 240943+ 83 Linux native > > I deleted partition 11 and 12 but after creating a new partition starting > at cylinder 1061 there is still the wrong bin value of 1024. > i don't think,

RE: fdisk problem - can't seek

1997-04-30 Thread Alan Schrank
Thanks Harmon your advice worked. I will log this as a problem. - Al -Original Message- From: Harmon Sequoya Nine [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 1997 12:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject:Re: fdisk problem - can't

Re: fdisk problem - can't seek

1997-04-29 Thread Harmon Sequoya Nine
Assuming you are using "cfdisk", the fdisk utility that is run as part of the initial Debian installation (i.e. the 6 disks). I had the same problem when I partitioned a large disk. I particular I was partitioning it into several logical partitions on the outer-most part of the disk. "cfdisk" di