also sprach dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.07.2047 +0100]:
> Yeah, apt won't stick it there, you (or I) would have to compile it
> separately. Possibly I could just send you the binary from the
> package, but when I did it at school I configured it to use my UID/GID
> as the "mail" UID/GID. Th
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 06:29:31PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
| also sprach dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.07.1756 +0100]:
| > I really like exim's filter capabilities, but it won't play so nicely
| > with postfix installed too. If you really want, I can give you tips
| > on installing exim
also sprach dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.07.1756 +0100]:
> I really like exim's filter capabilities, but it won't play so nicely
> with postfix installed too. If you really want, I can give you tips
> on installing exim to act solely as an MDA and not as the system MTA
> even though it isn't
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:10:43AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
| does anyone know of a mail delivery agent that's capable of the
| following:
|
| (1) accept a message at
| (2) run the message through any number of filters, possibly dying with
| a non-zero exit code to communicate a fa
On Mon, Jan 07, 2002 at 11:36:26AM +0100, Thorsten Haude wrote:
> I may be wrong, but wouldn't this break some expectations? I know only
> of MDAs that are called via ~/.forward, so there's no point in parsing
> it.
> What am I missing here?
Although it's not the most common configuration, ISTR th
also sprach Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.07.1345 +0100]:
> Whatever you think, Postfix starts my MDA because I tell it to in my
> ~/.forward. I've also seen this recommended for Sendmail & Procmail.
> So if you use your ~/.forward differently, you may run into problems,
> eg when one
Moin,
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-01-07 12:02]:
>also sprach Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.07.1136 +0100]:
>> I may be wrong, but wouldn't this break some expectations? I know only
>> of MDAs that are called via ~/.forward, so there's no point in parsing
>> it.
>.forwar
also sprach Thorsten Haude <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.07.1136 +0100]:
> I may be wrong, but wouldn't this break some expectations? I know only
> of MDAs that are called via ~/.forward, so there's no point in parsing
> it.
quite possible, the terminology gets flakey there... postfix is a
full-fea
Moin,
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [02-01-07 11:10]:
>does anyone know of a mail delivery agent that's capable of the
>following:
>
> (3) finally, respect ~/.forward, but if that doesn't exist, deliver to
> a Maildir? if it can't deliver to Maildirs, that should not be too
> mu
9 matches
Mail list logo
