Re: fails to run

2012-01-01 Thread Jim Lill
On 1/1/2012 8:52 AM, Claudius Hubig wrote: Jim Lill wrote: On 12/31/2011 3:15 PM, Claudius Hubig wrote: Jim Lill wrote: SLUG:~# php test.php - it just sits there, note the after the invocation Some other binaries do the same, but not all. What am I miss

Re: fails to run

2012-01-01 Thread Claudius Hubig
Jim Lill wrote: >On 12/31/2011 3:15 PM, Claudius Hubig wrote: >> Jim Lill wrote: >>> SLUG:~# php test.php >>> >>> - >>> >>> it just sits there, note the after the invocation >>> >>> Some other binaries do the same, but not all. What am I missing? >> I don’t know

Re: fails to run

2012-01-01 Thread Jim Lill
On 12/31/2011 3:15 PM, Claudius Hubig wrote: Jim Lill wrote: SLUG:~# php test.php - it just sits there, note the after the invocation Some other binaries do the same, but not all. What am I missing? I don’t know about the NSLU2 in detail, but maybe a # str

Re: fails to run

2011-12-31 Thread Claudius Hubig
Jim Lill wrote: >SLUG:~# php test.php > >- > >it just sits there, note the after the invocation > >Some other binaries do the same, but not all. What am I missing? I don’t know about the NSLU2 in detail, but maybe a # strace php test.php might help. If you don’