Re: failing to upgrade udev

2005-07-17 Thread Ms Linuz
Thomas Hood wrote: >On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 23:50:03 -0500, Brad Sims wrote: > > >>That kind of BS is why I stopped using $commercial_linux_distro. It's >>unstable >>I can accept broken packages due to ABI transitions but making a critical part >>depend on sudo-vaporware smacks of the Beast of Red

Re: failing to upgrade udev

2005-07-15 Thread Thomas Hood
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 23:50:03 -0500, Brad Sims wrote: > That kind of BS is why I stopped using $commercial_linux_distro. It's > unstable > I can accept broken packages due to ABI transitions but making a critical part > depend on sudo-vaporware smacks of the Beast of Redmond. Why did you think D

Re: failing to upgrade udev

2005-07-15 Thread Brad Sims
On Friday 15 July 2005 1:11 pm, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote: > In such a case, you should use stable distribution. Unstable is not for > everyone. It is useless to complain about instability of unstable. > Unstable is meant just to be that. > However that is no excuse for making a dependency for

Re: failing to upgrade udev

2005-07-15 Thread kamaraju kusumanchi
Lorenzo Taylor wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 kamaraju kusumanchi's comments on Re: failing to upgrade udev were as follows: # In such a case, you should use stable distribution. Unstable is not for # everyone. It is useless to complain about instability of uns

Re: failing to upgrade udev

2005-07-15 Thread kamaraju kusumanchi
Lorenzo Taylor wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 # Preparing to replace udev 0.056-3 # (using .../archives/udev_0.062-4_i386.deb) ... # udev requires a kernel >= 2.6.12, upgrade aborted. This is a classic example of probably the only thing I dislike about Debian. In su

Re: failing to upgrade udev

2005-07-15 Thread H. S.
Apparently, _Rogério Brito_, on 07/15/2005 12:18 PM,typed: On Jul 15 2005, Jon Roed wrote: Preparing to replace udev 0.056-3 (using .../archives/udev_0.062-4_i386.deb) ... The important part is this: udev requires a kernel >= 2.6.12, upgrade aborted. Upgrade your kernel and everything

Re: failing to upgrade udev

2005-07-15 Thread Lorenzo Taylor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 # Preparing to replace udev 0.056-3 # (using .../archives/udev_0.062-4_i386.deb) ... # udev requires a kernel >= 2.6.12, upgrade aborted. This is a classic example of probably the only thing I dislike about Debian. The latest version of udev depends

Re: failing to upgrade udev

2005-07-15 Thread Thomas Hood
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 11:06:34 -0500, Jon Roed wrote: > I just tried to run apt-upgrade on my Debian system and i got the following > error: This is a feature. You can't install the new udev package unless you have a kernel of version 2.6.12 or later. -- Thomas Hood -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: failing to upgrade udev

2005-07-15 Thread Rogério Brito
On Jul 15 2005, Jon Roed wrote: > Preparing to replace udev 0.056-3 > (using .../archives/udev_0.062-4_i386.deb) ... The important part is this: > udev requires a kernel >= 2.6.12, upgrade aborted. Upgrade your kernel and everything else should work fine. Otherwise, just replace udev with the