-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/09/08 18:49, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 12:32:13AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 21:41:37 -0400, Douglas A Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>>> How does this mesh with, for example, debian's thoug
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 09:12:37AM +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> Doug, you should have, choosing the headers of your choice.
>
> # .muttrc
> # What headers are displayed
> ignore *
> unignore From Date Subject To Cc User-agent X-Mailer
> # And for consistancy.
> unhdr_order *
> hdr_order X-Mai
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 12:32:13AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 21:41:37 -0400, Douglas A Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > How does this mesh with, for example, debian's thought-paradigms for
> > deciding if something is free. e.g. the desert-island paradigm where
> >
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 08:18:07PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> Something I've notice latey, is that people sending to the list have a
> header referred to as "Face". Since I use mutt on my VT520, all I see
> is a whole screen of ascii chars.
>
> Just as there's a netiquette rule about the nu
* Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-09 06:48:00 -0500]:
> >> ling isgs?
> > Long sigs ? ;-)
>
Long listings? :P
--
Regards,
Klein
I wish a robot would get elected president. That way, when he came to town,
we could all take a shot at him and not feel too bad.
-- Jac
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 06:48:00AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 04/09/08 06:43, Bob Cox wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 06:37:30 -0500, Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > wrote:
> >
> >> ling isgs?
> >>
> >> That must be some sort of typo, but I'll be damned if I can figure
> >> it out!
>
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 21:41:37 -0400
"Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Douglas,
> Well, the Face header is one long unwrapped line and it is gibberish
> in mutt. Luckily, there's "ignore Face" in my ~/.muttrc, but I still
Yes, it has to be decoded to be viewable, and has to be on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/09/08 06:43, Bob Cox wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 06:37:30 -0500, Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
>
>> ling isgs?
>>
>> That must be some sort of typo, but I'll be damned if I can figure
>> it out!
>
> Long sigs ? ;-)
Such bril
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 06:37:30 -0500, Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> ling isgs?
>
> That must be some sort of typo, but I'll be damned if I can figure
> it out!
Long sigs ? ;-)
--
Bob Cox. Stoke Gifford, near Bristol, UK.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/09/08 00:32, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
[snip]
> want to subscribe to the mailing list. Also rampant quoting, ling isgs,
ling isgs?
That must be some sort of typo, but I'll be damned if I can figure
it out!
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA US
On Tue, 8 Apr 2008 21:41:37 -0400, Douglas A Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> However, if we go with the question "if everybody did it", then what
> proportion of bandwidth for debian list would be taken up with "Face"
> headers. Would this be significant for someone downloading over a
> slow (
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 03:48:29PM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:41:56 -0500
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Ron,
>
> > On 04/07/08 05:44, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > > That's X-Face. Face can be colour.
> > I guess we'd better ask OP for clarification!
>
>
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008 09:10:41 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Andrew,
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 11:43:56AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > that) headers. Although you won't find likeness of me there.
> That's okay, mutt hides those headers for me. ;)
Aww, but you're mis
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 11:43:56AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 18:11:04 -0700
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Andrew,
>
> > seriously, though, it's silly vanity. That said, if you can get a
> > reasonable likeness of your face in 4 80 column lines,
On Monday 07 April 2008 07:41:18 am Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 04/07/08 05:56, Sebastian Krause wrote:
> > Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> It's a 48x48 b&w bitmap, designed in the 1980s (so it can't be that
> >> huge or resource-piggish) at Bell Labs.
> >
> > No, it's not: http://quimby.gn
On Mon, 07 Apr 2008 09:41:56 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Ron,
> On 04/07/08 05:44, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > That's X-Face. Face can be colour.
> I guess we'd better ask OP for clarification!
:-)
Doug. over to you :-)
OTOH, either will come out as gibberish in a te
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/07/08 05:44, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 21:11:52 -0500
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Ron,
>
>> It's a 48x48 b&w bitmap, designed in the 1980s (so it can't be that
>> huge or resource-piggish) at Bell Labs.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/07/08 05:56, Sebastian Krause wrote:
> Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It's a 48x48 b&w bitmap, designed in the 1980s (so it can't be that
>> huge or resource-piggish) at Bell Labs.
>
> No, it's not: http://quimby.gnus.org/circus/face/
On Sun, 06 Apr 2008 21:11:52 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Ron,
> It's a 48x48 b&w bitmap, designed in the 1980s (so it can't be that
> huge or resource-piggish) at Bell Labs.
That's X-Face. Face can be colour.
--
Regards _
/ ) "The blindingly obvious
On Sun, 6 Apr 2008 18:11:04 -0700
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Andrew,
> seriously, though, it's silly vanity. That said, if you can get a
> reasonable likeness of your face in 4 80 column lines, then why not?
I'm one of the "guilty" when it comes to face (and x-face, c
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's a 48x48 b&w bitmap, designed in the 1980s (so it can't be that
> huge or resource-piggish) at Bell Labs.
No, it's not: http://quimby.gnus.org/circus/face/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/06/08 19:18, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> Something I've notice latey, is that people sending to the list have a
> header referred to as "Face". Since I use mutt on my VT520, all I see
> is a whole screen of ascii chars.
>
> Just as there's a neti
On Sunday 06 April 2008 05:18:07 pm Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> Something I've notice latey, is that people sending to the list have a
> header referred to as "Face". Since I use mutt on my VT520, all I see
> is a whole screen of ascii chars.
You should tell mutt to hide that header for you, then.
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 08:18:07PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> Something I've notice latey, is that people sending to the list have a
> header referred to as "Face". Since I use mutt on my VT520, all I see
> is a whole screen of ascii chars.
>
> Just as there's a netiquette rule about the nu
24 matches
Mail list logo
