On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 09:51:23AM -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Which filesystem is more appropriate for maildir use on a
> Postfix/Dovecot system, ext2/3 or xfs? This maildir will be storing
> mulitple mail folders and files, some folders containing over 10,000
> email files.
I'd recommend XFS
Volkan YAZICI wrote:
> [...] ext2/3 requires huge amounts of rescan time during boot after
> an unexpected reboot.
Isn't the journal supposed to protect against this? IMO I don't see
particularly long rescan times on the large-ish filesystem that I have
(800 GB ext3 on lvm on top of hardware raid
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Which filesystem is more appropriate for maildir use on a Postfix/Dovecot
system, ext2/3 or xfs? This maildir will be storing mulitple mail folders and
files, some folders containing over 10,000 email files.
I'm a big fan of XFS and have successfully u
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
I strongly agree, even in recent ext4 and nilfs benchmarks, reiserfs is
generally the winner in many different scenarious. Besides, XFS is very
disappointing at power failures and ext2/3 requires huge amounts of
There are reasons for the observed XFS be
On Fri, 1 Jan 2010, Camaleón writes:
> On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 09:51:23 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Which filesystem is more appropriate for maildir use on a
>> Postfix/Dovecot system, ext2/3 or xfs? This maildir will be storing
>> mulitple mail folders and files, some folders containing over 10,0
On Fri, 01 Jan 2010 09:51:23 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> Which filesystem is more appropriate for maildir use on a
> Postfix/Dovecot system, ext2/3 or xfs? This maildir will be storing
> mulitple mail folders and files, some folders containing over 10,000
> email files.
How about ReiserFS?
D
6 matches
Mail list logo
