> Shaul Karl wrote:
> >
> > The following is an bad attempt to use exmh `Apply command to body'
> > feature.
> > However I believe it boils down to a tcl or a sh quoting question.
> >
> > What I am trying to do is to filter a message by applying a filter to
> > its body.
> >
> > Now this filter
Shaul Karl wrote:
>
> The following is an bad attempt to use exmh `Apply command to body'
> feature.
> However I believe it boils down to a tcl or a sh quoting question.
>
> What I am trying to do is to filter a message by applying a filter to
> its body.
>
> Now this filter
>
> sed -n "s/I
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 11:40:44PM -0600, Lance Hoffmeyer wrote:
>
> I am having problems getting Exmh to enter the correct sender
> in my header. It keeps putting [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> In exim.conf I wrote a rewrite script
>
> ^(root|postmailer|mailer-daemon)@* [
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
"john smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Run the "inc" command to get your
> MH environment initialized right.
If you run /usr/bin/mh/inc, it should ask you a question (or two) about
where you want to store your incoming mail. Once you've don
> OK this is a new user question... but I checked the man pages, the docs and
> the Web pages on this issue and came up dry.
>
> According to the manual/web pages on exmh, once I have all the proper
> software installed (I do) I can run
> wish -f exmh.install
>
> according to the README.exm
trapstep wrote:
>Hi!
>
>i now use exmh for my mails, but i miss a "sent-mail" folder :-( doesn't exm
>h
>save the mails i send? if yes, where will i find them and if no, is there a
>way to automatically send me a copy of all outgoing mail?
You can do it on a one-off basis by add
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mark Phillips
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have just managed to reproduce the error at the commandline using
>the inc command (nmh). I have sent off a message to the nmh-workers
>telling them about the bug.
It's nmh? I tried to use nmh, too, when upgrading to hamm. But th
> Thanks for this, I have scanned the messages you included as well as
> my own, looking for similarities/differences. I think I may have discovered
> a common theme. It would seem that all the errant messages were sent using
> the mailer "Mutt".
>
> My sample size it still too small to be conc
> > > There have been a number of reports from people recently that doing
> > > a presort inc sometimes fails from within exmh.
> >
> > I have been doing some further experiments.
>
> If it helps, I had it happens yesterday twice: The first time was on
> message number 140, and the second wa
> There have been a number of reports from people recently that doing
> a presort inc sometimes fails from within exmh.
I have been doing some further experiments.
The output from exmh is as follows:
BgAction Inc IncInner
BackgroundPending Inc
exmh-bg {Inc_Presort +MyIncTmp: {child killed:
> Thanks for this! I used the script that you included below and eventually
> managed to work out what the problem is.
>
> It would seem that you need to chmod .maildelivery so that only you have
> rw access to it. This didn't seem to be in the documentation anywhere!
> That I could find anyway.
Dear Steve,
> I think I had the same problem and tracked it down with
> the enclosed--see where it goes awry. (It simulates what
> exmh does.)
Thanks for this! I used the script that you included below and eventually
managed to work out what the problem is.
It would seem that you need to chmod
Hm-m-m-m
That's indeed strange. Am I right that you use "presort" in "ways to inc"
(Top 10 menu)?
You know what, I saw something similar... It was about 1 month ago, my exmh
kept incorporating same mails again and again. It looked like I had a
corrupted mail in my mailbox. And indeed presor
On Fri, 11 Dec 1998, Alexander Kushnirenko wrote:
> I think you need "rcvstore". Here is my .maildelivery (Debian slink)
> cc debian-user@lists.debian.org | ? "/usr/lib/mh/rcvstore +debian/user"
> to debian-user@lists.debian.org | ? "/usr/lib/mh/rcvstore +debian/user"
> default -
I think those "folder" words should be "+".
-Jongki
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to setup exmh to presort my email messages when I do an inc.
> I have created a .maildelivery file in my home directory, namely:
>
> X-mailing-listdebian-user folder ? list/deb-user
> default
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> From time to time I am still trying to convince exmh to use the login and
> address of my ISP's account ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).
>
[ ... excerpts from PPP-HOWTO, on configuring MH ... ]
>
> But it didn't give me the correct From field.
>
[ ... more from PPP-HOWTO
> I've installed it, and it looks realy cool, but it doesn't fetch
> my mail. I told it the name of the mail server at my ISP, but it
> never asked for a password and I don't see anywhere in all those
> bazillion configuration options where to specify it. Also,
> I've written a perl to check my m
> Question: How to change exmh configuration so that it will let smail do what
> I
> want ? That is, how to prevent exmh from disturbing smail to set the From:
> header the way I want it to be ?
You want to change this in nmh or MH (whichever you're using), not in EXMH.
--
Unsubscribe? mai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I changed my smail configuration so that it will change the From: field
> on an outgoing mail to be my account on my ISP machine
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> This setting is working when I use the mail command. For example,
> $ echo `date` | mail -s test [EMAIL PROTEC
On Sat, 28 Mar 1998, Erik van der Meulen wrote:
> I would like to use exmh for my mail client, instead of elm. I would like to
> set up procmail for the filtering and sorting. Early experiments succeeded
> in moving mail to elm-style files but not in a format which is acceptable to
> ex(mh) direct
"Oliver Elphick" wrote:
>Erik van der Meulen wrote:
> ...
> >Could anyone send me an example of a .procmail file for use with exmh?
>
>This is my ~/.procmailrc:
>
>MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail
>LOCKFILE=$HOME/procmail/lock
>LOGFILE=$HOME/procmail/new
>LOGABSTRACT=all
>TRAP=$HOME/procma
Erik van der Meulen wrote:
...
>Could anyone send me an example of a .procmail file for use with exmh?
This is my ~/.procmailrc:
MAILDIR=$HOME/Mail
LOCKFILE=$HOME/procmail/lock
LOGFILE=$HOME/procmail/new
LOGABSTRACT=all
TRAP=$HOME/procmail/postprocess
DEFAULT=inbox/.
#:0 c
#backup/.
#
:0
* ^TO
On Thu, 12 Mar 1998 12:35:57 CST, wrote:
> Hi, All
>
> I have problem sending e-mails from EXMH, but I can receive them succesfully.
> It looks like ordinary Mail program works fine (I can both send and receive e
> -mails). Here is the message from EXMH:
> post: problem initializing server; [RPLY
> I'm trying to install the exmh package, but I'm running into an interesting
> problem. It depends on tcl40 or tcl41, and I have tcl42. ALso, it depends
> on tk74 or tk75. I have tk76. Is this a bug/problem, or normal?
This is a stable system, right? I guess the dependencies were wrong, but i
Hi,
Well the title should have been "exmh questions become smail questions."
Thanks to Martin Bialasinski for suggesting setting up my own domain.
Is there a domain name reserved for private networks like the reserved
ip address ranges? I picked home.bradshaw, but I'd switch to the
correct name
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I saw a suggestion to use someething like "@home.net" for local users.
> The MUA's I've seen try to qualify the username and that dummy address
> might be the thing to use. Please send your suggestions, or I'll post
> if I get things improved a little more.
>
This was
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Bradshaw) writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm considering using exmh for my mail reader. I want to filter mail
> into different folders and be able to see which folders have messages in
> them. Suggestions of other mail readers with this feature would be
> welcome.
>
> However I'm cur
Lee Bradshaw wrote:
>I'm considering using exmh for my mail reader. I want to filter mail
>into different folders and be able to see which folders have messages in
>them. Suggestions of other mail readers with this feature would be
>welcome.
I use procmail to write
--
Oliver Elphick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Bradshaw) writes:
> Hi,
>
> I'm considering using exmh for my mail reader. I want to filter mail
> into different folders and be able to see which folders have messages in
> them. Suggestions of other mail readers with this feature would be
> welcome.
> --
> Lee Bradshaw
Lance Levsen wrote:
>
> Oh yeah, on other thing. The last filter should be to your +inbox. and shoul
> d
> be generic:
>
> :0
> *
> |/usr/lib/mh/rcvstore +inbox
>
> This allows anything that failed all tests to get dumped into the inbox
> instead of the bit bucket (or where ever el
Oh yeah, on other thing. The last filter should be to your +inbox. and should
be generic:
:0
*
|/usr/lib/mh/rcvstore +inbox
This allows anything that failed all tests to get dumped into the inbox
instead of the bit bucket (or where ever else it might go or do).
-Lance
--
-
If I had a nea
Hi Mario. Here's how I do it with procmail. Took me a little bit to
figure
out, but now there's no problem. This may or may not help you, I use a dialup
and gwpop, but you can use any MTA that will send mail through a filter.
In Exmh (I'm using 2.0zeta) under Preferences-->Incorporate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On 7 Aug, Victor Torrico wrote:
> >
> > What must be changed and in which programs to make "From:" read
> > properly?
> >
> Hi,
>
> I don't know how to do headerrewriting in smail. I simply specify a
> from header in my mailprogramm.
>
> If this is not suitable to y
exmh uses mh to actually process mail. The mh that comes with debian
requires sendmail. If you want to get your mail directly from your ISP,
you have to do it manually with mh (due to a BUG in mh dealing with .netrc
files) -- However, there is a version of nmh that has been packaged for
debian (al
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, writes:
>Hello All,
>
>I'm using the debian package exmh. Only connected to an ISP with pop3
>mail using PPP. Do not get incoming mail into the ~/Mail/inbox
>directory. Haven't tried outgoing mail.
>
>Mail works fine using Netscape Communicator but I
On Sat, 26 Jul 1997, Victor Torrico wrote:
> Francis Swasey wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Do you think it is the debian package "fetchmail" that you refer to
> above?
Yes, fetchmail it is.
Frank
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble
Francis Swasey wrote:
> If you choose to use mh, you need to run (Oh rats, brain
> failure--begins
> with the letter "f" and replaces the popclient program) to pull the
> mail
> from your ISP into your /var/spool/mail/USERID mailbox. Once the mail
> is
> there, mh/exmh can read it into your perso
: Francis Swasey wrote:
:
: > If you choose to use mh, you need to run (Oh rats, brain
: > failure--begins
: > with the letter "f" and replaces the popclient program) to pull the
: > mail
: > from your ISP into your /var/spool/mail/USERID mailbox. Once the mail
: > is
: > there, mh/exmh can read
> > I seem to have a problem with exmh (or X). When I start exmh I get a string
> > of
> >
> > BGRegister insecure server (must run old style xauth). Command ignored.
> >
> > I think I understand what is happening: my X server is not generating
> > the ~/.Xauthority file needed to run secure and
On Fri, 16 Aug 1996 22:53:39 +0200 Giuseppe Vacanti
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I seem to have a problem with exmh (or X). When I start exmh I get a string
> of
>
> BGRegister insecure server (must run old style xauth). Command ignored.
>
> I think I understand what is happening: my
40 matches
Mail list logo
