Re: esound locking sound

2006-09-13 Thread Carl Johnson
"Yuwen Dai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes. Some sound applications have options to use esd, i.e., mplayer. Some > don't have. In such case, you have to kill the esd. That's life :-) I just started esd with the command 'esd -as 2', which releases the audio device 2 seconds after any sound st

Re: esound locking sound

2006-09-12 Thread Yuwen Dai
Esound grabs /dev/dsp to manage it, so you can hear sounds fromdifferent apps concurrently.  For example, hear warning or alert sounds while playing mp3s or videos.On sarge, for ogg123, you'll need to put this in  /etc/libao.conf or~/.libao:default_driver=esdThat works for me.  See man libao.conf .

Re: esound locking sound

2006-09-03 Thread Ralph Katz
On 09/03/2006 05:20 AM, garrone wrote: > Hi, > I am having some difficulty getting sound perfectly right. > > The esd or esound daemon is hogging /dev/dsp etc, causing > game sound and ogg123 to fail. I have to kill esd manually and > start the alsamixergui application and enable channels > b

Re: esound clobbers OSS?

2006-05-06 Thread Andrew Sackville-West
On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 08:31:55PM -0400, Marty wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > >On Saturday 06 May 2006 16:47, Marty wrote: > >>My system is stock Sarge, with Gnome and stock Debian kernel. > >> > >>I rarely use OSS programs, and when I did try to use one recently I found > >>that OSS was not worki

Re: esound clobbers OSS?

2006-05-06 Thread Marty
Paul Johnson wrote: On Saturday 06 May 2006 16:47, Marty wrote: My system is stock Sarge, with Gnome and stock Debian kernel. I rarely use OSS programs, and when I did try to use one recently I found that OSS was not working. After some investigation I found that it started working again after

Re: esound clobbers OSS?

2006-05-06 Thread Paul Johnson
On Saturday 06 May 2006 16:47, Marty wrote: > My system is stock Sarge, with Gnome and stock Debian kernel. > > I rarely use OSS programs, and when I did try to use one recently I found > that OSS was not working. After some investigation I found that it started > working again after I unchecked t

Re: esound and alsa not compatible?

2004-10-26 Thread John L Fjellstad
Eric Gaumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Portability and network transparency are two strong advantages that come > to mind. You are looking at it from a users perspective. Consider it > from a programmers point of view and it will be clear that even with > Alsa, a good sound daemon is important.

Re: esound and alsa not compatible?

2004-10-25 Thread Eric Gaumer
On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 10:54 -0700, John L Fjellstad wrote: > Eric Gaumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Alsa cannot play multiple audio streams simultaneously. From what I > > understand, this is more of a hardware limitation than an alsa > > limitation. They claim that some sound cards can do

Re: esound and alsa not compatible?

2004-10-25 Thread Erik Steffl
Eric Gaumer wrote: On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 22:10 -0700, John L Fjellstad wrote: Eric Gaumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I think you are confusing the two. Alsa is a sound architecture but esound is a sound daemon. Alsa makes sounds where as esound plays more of a traffic cop role. Bottom line is tha

Re: esound and alsa not compatible?

2004-10-25 Thread John L Fjellstad
Eric Gaumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Alsa cannot play multiple audio streams simultaneously. From what I > understand, this is more of a hardware limitation than an alsa > limitation. They claim that some sound cards can do automatic hardware > mixing. If your card can't do this then there i

Re: esound and alsa not compatible?

2004-10-25 Thread Eric Gaumer
On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 22:10 -0700, John L Fjellstad wrote: > Eric Gaumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I think you are confusing the two. Alsa is a sound architecture but > > esound is a sound daemon. Alsa makes sounds where as esound plays more > > of a traffic cop role. Bottom line is that t

Re: esound and alsa not compatible?

2004-10-25 Thread John L Fjellstad
Eric Gaumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think you are confusing the two. Alsa is a sound architecture but > esound is a sound daemon. Alsa makes sounds where as esound plays more > of a traffic cop role. Bottom line is that they serve two different > purposes when dealing with sound. Alsa play

[SOLVED and work around] Re: esound and alsa not compatible?

2004-10-24 Thread H. S.
Apparently, _H. S._, on 24/10/04 20:03,typed: If you use ALSA and esound then you should install libesd-alsa0 instead of libesd0. I already have libesd-alsa0 installed and removed libesd0 (which was 'rc' and not 'ii' in dpkg info): ~$ dpkg -l libesd* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | St

Re: esound and alsa not compatible?

2004-10-24 Thread H. S.
Apparently, _Thomas Hood_, on 24/10/04 15:56,typed: On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:50:07 +0200, H. S. wrote: I could do that. But how does that relate to Alsa? If I install esound, can I just uninstall Alsa altogether? If you use ALSA and esound then you should install libesd-alsa0 instead of libesd0. I

Re: esound and alsa not compatible?

2004-10-24 Thread H. S.
Apparently, _Eric Gaumer_, on 24/10/04 16:08,typed: I think you are confusing the two. Alsa is a sound architecture but esound is a sound daemon. Alsa makes sounds where as esound plays more of a traffic cop role. Bottom line is that they serve two different purposes when dealing with sound. Alsa p

Re: esound and alsa not compatible?

2004-10-24 Thread Thomas Hood
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:50:07 +0200, H. S. wrote: > I could do that. But how does that relate to Alsa? If I install esound, > can I just uninstall Alsa altogether? If you use ALSA and esound then you should install libesd-alsa0 instead of libesd0. -- Thomas Hood -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [

Re: esound and alsa not compatible?

2004-10-24 Thread Thomas Hood
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:20:07 +0200, H. S. wrote: > So I installed esound last night (Gnome in Unstable, kernel 2.6.7). > Since then, after reboot, whichever user logs in kind of own esd because > if then that user logs out and another logs in, s/he get in > .xsession-errors: Please submit this

Re: esound and alsa not compatible?

2004-10-24 Thread Eric Gaumer
On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 15:31 -0400, H. S. wrote: > Apparently, _Eric Gaumer_, on 24/10/04 15:14,typed: > >> > >>When is do 'ps uax | grep esd' i see an esd session from the last user > >>that had first logged in. Also, xmms does not work anymore. Killing esd > >>solves the xmms problem but Gnome s

Re: esound and alsa not compatible?

2004-10-24 Thread H. S.
Apparently, _Eric Gaumer_, on 24/10/04 15:14,typed: On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 14:53 -0400, H. S. wrote: I had ALSA built as module in the kernel without OSS support. Alsa was working fine (xmms, xine, etc.) but was giving no system sounds at all. So I installed esound last night (Gnome in Unstable, k

Re: esound and alsa not compatible?

2004-10-24 Thread Eric Gaumer
On Sun, 2004-10-24 at 14:53 -0400, H. S. wrote: > I had ALSA built as module in the kernel without OSS support. Alsa was > working fine (xmms, xine, etc.) but was giving no system sounds at all. > So I installed esound last night (Gnome in Unstable, kernel 2.6.7). > Since then, after reboot, whi

Re: esound

2001-08-01 Thread Steve Gran
> > Steve> connect to UNIX socket /var/run/esound/socket". I checked to > Steve> make sure it wasn't something silly, like the directory not > Steve> existing, but sure enough, the directory is there. It's owned > Steve> by root, but I assume that's as should be. Any suggestions? > > Add yoursel

Re: esound

2001-07-30 Thread Guy Geens
> "Steve" == Steve Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Steve> connect to UNIX socket /var/run/esound/socket". I checked to Steve> make sure it wasn't something silly, like the directory not Steve> existing, but sure enough, the directory is there. It's owned Steve> by root, but I assume that's as

Re: esound

2001-07-28 Thread Petr \[Dingo\] Dvorak
On Sun, 29 Jul 2001, Mart van de Wege wrote: MvdW> Well I don't know where I heard it first, but there *is* a rumour that esd MvdW> is about to be orphaned, or at least decoupled from gnome. For me, I'd MvdW> like that because it is way too temperamental, OTOH, the alternative seems MvdW> to be ar

Re: esound

2001-07-28 Thread Mart van de Wege
On Sat, 28 Jul 2001 14:17:43 -0400 Steve Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 28 Jul 2001 08:23:44 Mart van de Wege wrote: > > I'm having some weird esd behaviour as well. Specifically, if I log > out > > and another user (visiting friends) log in, or vice versa, esd refuses > to > > play.

Re: esound

2001-07-28 Thread Steve Gran
On Sat, 28 Jul 2001 08:23:44 Mart van de Wege wrote: > On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 15:31:42 -0400 > Steve Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello all, > > I'm having an interesting problem - esound has up and quit on me for > > some > > reason. I'm running Debian testing, and it worked just fine (al

Re: esound

2001-07-28 Thread Mart van de Wege
On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 15:31:42 -0400 Steve Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > I'm having an interesting problem - esound has up and quit on me for > some > reason. I'm running Debian testing, and it worked just fine (although > occasionally it wouldn't disconnect from a user after logou

Re: Esound & Festival

2000-12-31 Thread Paul Clark
On Sat, 30 Dec 2000 13:48:36 -0800, Eric G. Miller wrote: >Try running esd with the "-as " parameter. That'll free the audio >device after "" seconds which should allow festival to play >directly without esd mucking it up. You can do that in your >~/.xsession. Alternatively, if you run gnome-se

Re: Esound & Festival

2000-12-30 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 09:11:37PM +, Paul Clark wrote: > I have tried using Festival to read a text document and it appears > that the ESD Sound Daemon is sometimes processing two lots of speech > at once making it incomprehensible. > > I am not familiar with ESD. The man page and /usr/share/

Re: eSound problem with old SB16

2000-11-12 Thread Greg Gilbert
Esound appears to be broken on systems running later 2.4.0 kernels. Same thing happens on my SB128Pci. Unfortunatly since It's more or less unmaintained my solution is gonna have to be buy a SB Live if you want multiplexing. Greg * Jan Pfeifer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > hi, > > sorry if

Re: esound (woody) broken?

2000-06-12 Thread Brad
On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 11:46:08AM -0400, Thomas Hood wrote: > > GNOME plays sounds through esd. If esd is not running, > and sound is enabled in GNOME, and an app issues a sound, then > GNOME pauses or hangs up. So one wants esd to be running. i don't use gnome, but i edited /etc/esound/esd.co

Re: esound (woody) broken?

2000-06-12 Thread Jeronimo Pellegrini
:: On Mon, 12 Jun 2000 11:46:08 -0400, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > GNOME plays sounds through esd. If esd is not running, > and sound is enabled in GNOME, and an app issues a sound, then > GNOME pauses or hangs up. So one wants esd to be running. Well, I have a different problem. W

Re: esound (woody) broken?

2000-06-12 Thread Thomas Hood
> Oh, well... I can play mp3s here. What are you using to play them? In > xmms, try chosing the OSS driver instead of esound. > > The only thing that's not working here is esound. > BTW, I'm running woody. GNOME plays sounds through esd. If esd is not running, and sound is enabled in GNOME, and

Re: esound (woody) broken?

2000-06-12 Thread Thomas Hood
Dietmar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As already postet twice, I have problems with sound after installing potato. > I'm > using just the same sound card. (Creative PCI 128-Ensoniq 1371) Whenever I > use gnome > or sawfish with sound-support everything on my X-server freezes while I play > mp3s.

Re: esound (woody) broken?

2000-06-11 Thread Chris Gray
On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 01:01:48PM +0200, Dietmar wrote: > > I'm using xmms and it doesn't change anything whether I choose the > OSS-driver or esound. In fact I figured out that gnome is not > responsible for it in a special way, because similar things happen > when I use fvwm95 without gnome. W

Re: esound (woody) broken?

2000-06-11 Thread Dietmar
Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote: > :: On Sat, 10 Jun 2000 18:04:17 +0200, Dietmar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > As already postet twice, I have problems with sound after installing > > potato. I'm > > using just the same sound card. (Creative PCI 128-Ensoniq 1371) Whenever I > > use gnome > > or saw

Re: esound (woody) broken?

2000-06-10 Thread Jeronimo Pellegrini
:: On Sat, 10 Jun 2000 18:04:17 +0200, Dietmar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > As already postet twice, I have problems with sound after installing potato. > I'm > using just the same sound card. (Creative PCI 128-Ensoniq 1371) Whenever I > use gnome > or sawfish with sound-support everything on my

Re: esound (woody) broken?

2000-06-10 Thread Dietmar
Jeronimo Pellegrini wrote: > Hi. > > Did anyone have problems with esound in woody? > > I just installed a Creative Ensoniq PCI sound card, and it works well, > except that when I try to use esound. It plays one second, and then > repeats that over and over (until I kill esd)... I saw no bug filed

Re: esound, lesstif, debian issues

2000-03-25 Thread Chris Gray
On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 05:06:48PM +0100, Lepus wrote: > Hi. > > First of all, it is quite interesting that I didn't get a single reply on > my question about the esound dependency problems. Am I he only one who > would like to use Gnome and Alsa at the same time under Potato? :) > Well, anyway.

Re: Esound, I broke it, can I fix it?

2000-02-28 Thread John Miskinis
Hi, FYI - I fixed it! In case anyone else ever gets into this boat, do a "make uninstall" in the (tarball) 0.2.8 directory, then "dpkg -r --force-depends esound". Then re-install the esound deb package, and things will work again. Whew, John Miskinis __

Re: Esound and vmware

1999-08-09 Thread Andy Spiegl
Hi! thanks for your replies! It works now. > I've used ESD with VMWare fine. What are the permissions on > /dev/dsp? What user is running VMWare? What user started esd? Perm: 666 same user for all But here was my mistake: > if you start esound with > # esd -terminate -nobeeps -as 2 > > it sho

Re: Esound and vmware

1999-08-07 Thread Stephen Pitts
On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 06:35:53PM +0200, Andy Spiegl wrote: > Hi! > > I tried to start vmware with the esddsp wrapper, but vmware still > complains that it can't access /dev/dsp. > I've used ESD with VMWare fine. What are the permissions on /dev/dsp? What user is running VMWare? What user star

Re: Esound problem (gnome) - sound device inadequate

1999-06-13 Thread Dennis Schoen
Micha Feigin wrote: > > I have a computer with no sound ( yes it's an old 486 there is still one > of these around :) ). > The thing is that whenever i try to start a gnome program it tries to > search /dev/dsp for a sound card (permision denied), fails, gives me a > message : Sound device inadequ

RE: Esound problem (gnome) - sound device inadequate

1999-06-13 Thread Pollywog
On 13-Jun-99 Micha Feigin wrote: > I have a computer with no sound ( yes it's an old 486 there is still one > of these around :) ). Have you tried adding yourself to the "audio" group? It might work even though you have no sound device. -- Andrew