Re: ecryptfs being unmounted while user is still logged in

2014-04-22 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Tue, 22 Apr 2014 14:19:21 +0200 Roland Hieber napísal: > On 20.04.2014 00:49, Roland Hieber wrote: > > Unfortunately, I cannot find anything related in /var/log/*, but I > > have the feeling that it has to do with my recent switch to > > systemd-sysv. > > For the record, purging syste

Re: ecryptfs being unmounted while user is still logged in

2014-04-22 Thread Roland Hieber
On 20.04.2014 00:49, Roland Hieber wrote: > Unfortunately, I cannot find anything related in /var/log/*, but I have > the feeling that it has to do with my recent switch to systemd-sysv. For the record, purging systemd-sysv and installing sysvinit-core again got rid of that nasty bug. I would like

Re: Ecryptfs vs encfs

2011-03-22 Thread Dan
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Jon Dowland wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 08:51:27PM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > > With ecryptfs,  I can have a file-level backup solution work on the backing > files, not require an active login or mounted FS, and do replication to other > nodes/sites witho

Re: Ecryptfs vs encfs

2011-03-22 Thread Jon Dowland
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 08:51:27PM -0700, Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > Generally, my advice is to use dm-crypt for block devices (like > encrypting an entire /home partition that root plans to mount at > bootup), and encfs for encrypting individual directories other than > $HOME. YMMV. I've been using

Re: Ecryptfs vs encfs

2011-03-22 Thread Dan
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Todd A. Jacobs wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Dan wrote: >> I would like to encrypt some folders in the home directory of the >> users in a server. I have seen that there are 2 choices ecryptfs and >> encfs. They seem to be very similar. Which one do y

Re: Ecryptfs vs encfs

2011-03-21 Thread Todd A. Jacobs
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Dan wrote: > I would like to encrypt some folders in the home directory of the > users in a server. I have seen that there are 2 choices ecryptfs and > encfs. They seem to be very similar. Which one do you think that it is > better? One isn't better than the other

Re: ecryptfs

2008-11-04 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 02:50:31PM -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote: > Bob Cox wrote: > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-file search ecryptfs-setup-private > >>> ecryptfs-utils: /usr/bin/ecryptfs-setup-private > >>> ecryptfs-utils: /usr/share/man/man1/ecryptfs-setup-private.1.gz ... > in this case it

Re: ecryptfs

2008-11-03 Thread Paul Cartwright
Bob Cox wrote: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-file search ecryptfs-setup-private >>> ecryptfs-utils: /usr/bin/ecryptfs-setup-private >>> ecryptfs-utils: /usr/share/man/man1/ecryptfs-setup-private.1.gz >>> >>> This is with lenny. >>> >> looks like lenny changed the files to : >> >> /usr/bin/ecryptfs-m

Re: ecryptfs

2008-11-03 Thread Bob Cox
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 14:08:31 -0500, Paul Cartwright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Bob Cox wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 06:46:30 -0500, Paul Cartwright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > wrote: > > > >> I was reading a ubuntu how-to on ecryptfs ( for my laptop) and was > >> interested in install

Re: ecryptfs

2008-11-03 Thread Bob Cox
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 06:46:30 -0500, Paul Cartwright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I was reading a ubuntu how-to on ecryptfs ( for my laptop) and was > interested in installing it on my Debian desktop. the ecryptfs-utils app > installed just fine, but there was no user program > (ecryptfs-setu