On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 03:41:34AM +, Finn wrote:
> arne wrote:
> > I am allergic to ads.
> >
> > So I use an adblocker, ublock origin.
> > I have squid and privoxy proxy's running.
> > Have a local searx as search engine.
> >
>
> Are you running Searx instance in your system locally? If so,
arne wrote:
> I am allergic to ads.
>
> So I use an adblocker, ublock origin.
> I have squid and privoxy proxy's running.
> Have a local searx as search engine.
>
Are you running Searx instance in your system locally? If so, how? Searx
isn't packed for Debian yet. Probably installed using Docker
On 19-08-19 22:50, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 19, 2019 04:17:26 PM steef wrote:
On 19-08-19 17:45, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 19, 2019 08:27:57 AM steef wrote:
On 19-08-19 00:41, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that the problem you are concerned about?
well,
On 19-08-19 17:45, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, August 19, 2019 08:27:57 AM steef wrote:
On 19-08-19 00:41, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 05:27:07 PM steef wrote:
On 18-08-19 22:04, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 01:16:59 PM nektarios wrote
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 20:50:05 +0100
Joe wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:19:37 -0400
> Celejar wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:23:44 +0200
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 06:26:20PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:52:07 +0200
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > ..
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 09:19:37 -0400
Celejar wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:23:44 +0200
> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 06:26:20PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:52:07 +0200
> > > wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > >I certainly need to use numerous
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:23:44 +0200
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 06:26:20PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:52:07 +0200
> > wrote:
...
> >I certainly need to use numerous sites (bill
> > paying, banking, etc.) that require JS to function.
>
> Th
On 19-08-19 00:41, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 05:27:07 PM steef wrote:
On 18-08-19 22:04, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 01:16:59 PM nektarios wrote:
--< snip >--
I have a similar setup as yours but am getting no popups from my browser
(firefo
On Sunday, 18 Aug 2019 at 22:52, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> This is actually for me a filter criterion: if a site doesn't work
> with javascript, chances are high that I avoid it. I do make some
> exceptions, but very few.
Ditto. My exceptions are my bank and flickr. All else I access via eww
in
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 06:26:20PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:52:07 +0200
> wrote:
[... on disabling javascript]
> Question: is this due to a belief that such sites are (at least for
> your use cases) at best marginally more useful than their non-JS
> utilizing alternatives,
I am allergic to ads.
So I use an adblocker, ublock origin.
I have squid and privoxy proxy's running.
Have a local searx as search engine.
99.% of the visited sites are without ads, no tracking.
Hope this helps.
> Question: is this due to a belief that such sites are (at least for
> your
On 8/18/19 5:16 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> I use NoScript to enable JavaScript only where I want it.
Yeah. And Firefox has a checkbox in the prefs to block pop-ups. I rarely
see a pop-up any more.
I have a hard time believing DDG is what's doing your pop-ups. It'd
destroy their reputation.
On 19/08/2019 08:52, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
This is actually for me a filter criterion: if a site doesn't work
with javascript, chances are high that I avoid it. I do make some
exceptions, but very few.
I use NoScript to enable JavaScript only where I want it.
Kind regards,
--
Ben Caradoc-Da
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 22:52:07 +0200
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:35:53PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:20:08 -0500
> > Richard Owlett wrote:
> >
> >
> > >
> > > I personally find that JavaScript and cookies rarely provide *ME* any
> > > functionality of interest. I surf
On 18-08-19 22:04, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 01:16:59 PM nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
h
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:35:53PM +0100, Joe wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:20:08 -0500
> Richard Owlett wrote:
>
>
> >
> > I personally find that JavaScript and cookies rarely provide *ME* any
> > functionality of interest. I surf with both disabled. I don't
> > experience problems I see o
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 14:20:08 -0500
Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> I personally find that JavaScript and cookies rarely provide *ME* any
> functionality of interest. I surf with both disabled. I don't
> experience problems I see often reported. YMMV
It does vary indeed. It seems to me that hardly
On Sunday, August 18, 2019 01:16:59 PM nektarios wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
>
> steef wrote:
> > hi folks,
> >
> > last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
> > DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
> > happy with the popup of
On 18-08-19 21:20, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 08/18/2019 01:34 PM, steef wrote:
On 18-08-19 19:16, nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', other
On 08/18/2019 01:34 PM, steef wrote:
On 18-08-19 19:16, nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
happy with the popup of unwan
On 18-08-19 19:16, nektarios wrote:
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
hi folks,
last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
happy with the popup of unwanted ads which cannot be blocked
perman
On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 18:29:49 +0200
steef wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> last days I get some slightly disturbing info about the browser_ad
> DuckDuckgo. some say it's malicious 'malware', others seem to be
> happy with the popup of unwanted ads which cannot be blocked
> permanently: and the last thing m
22 matches
Mail list logo
