Re: dual layered DVD's vs single layer etc....

2006-12-05 Thread hendrik
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 08:04:11AM +1100, M-L wrote: > On Monday 04 December 2006 07:51, Michael Fothergill sent this for all our > perusal: > >---> > >---> Once it gets to that size would dual layered DVD iso images be > > considered to ---> be parked in the repositories? > >---> > >---> > >--->

Re: dual layered DVD's vs single layer etc....

2006-12-04 Thread Douglas Tutty
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:35:03AM -0800, Alan Ianson wrote: > On Monday 04 December 2006 11:23, Douglas Tutty wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 10:43:20AM -0800, Alan Ianson wrote: > > > On Monday 04 December 2006 10:06, Scarletdown wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 17:04 -0900, Greg Madden wr

Re: dual layered DVD's vs single layer etc....

2006-12-04 Thread Douglas Tutty
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 10:43:20AM -0800, Alan Ianson wrote: > On Monday 04 December 2006 10:06, Scarletdown wrote: > > On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 17:04 -0900, Greg Madden wrote: > > > Part of this discussion concerned the cost of DL media vs single > > > layer.At the time DL was about $8/disk while com

Re: dual layered DVD's vs single layer etc....

2006-12-04 Thread ss11223
Michael Fothergill wrote: > Dear Debian people, > > This is a pretty dumb question. But I think it has a little merit. I > bought myself a new Benq DVD rewriter and stuffed in my box. This one can > handle dual layered DVDs as well as the single ones. > > I then realised after nosing around in

Re: dual layered DVD's vs single layer etc....

2006-12-04 Thread Alan Ianson
On Monday 04 December 2006 11:23, Douglas Tutty wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 10:43:20AM -0800, Alan Ianson wrote: > > On Monday 04 December 2006 10:06, Scarletdown wrote: > > > On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 17:04 -0900, Greg Madden wrote: > > > > Part of this discussion concerned the cost of DL media v

Re: dual layered DVD's vs single layer etc....

2006-12-04 Thread Alan Ianson
On Sunday 03 December 2006 18:04, Greg Madden wrote: > On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 21:08:18 + > > Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > > >Dear Debian people, > > > > > >This is a pretty dumb question. But I think it has a little mer

Re: dual layered DVD's vs single layer etc....

2006-12-04 Thread Alan Ianson
On Monday 04 December 2006 10:06, Scarletdown wrote: > On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 17:04 -0900, Greg Madden wrote: > > Part of this discussion concerned the cost of DL media vs single > > layer.At the time DL was about $8/disk while compared to maybe > > $1.00/disk for SL, not a good value, imho. The eco

Re: dual layered DVD's vs single layer etc....

2006-12-04 Thread Steve McIntyre
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 21:08:18 + >Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> *maybe*. We had some of this discussion before sarge released, when >> there was a chance that we might make sarge fit on a single DL >> DVD. See the debian-cd mailing l

Re: dual layered DVD's vs single layer etc....

2006-12-04 Thread Scarletdown
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 17:04 -0900, Greg Madden wrote: > Part of this discussion concerned the cost of DL media vs single > layer.At the time DL was about $8/disk while compared to maybe > $1.00/disk for SL, not a good value, imho. The economics may have > changed. DL disks are still rather pricey

Re: dual layered DVD's vs single layer etc....

2006-12-04 Thread Alan Ianson
On Monday 04 December 2006 10:54, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote: > Alan Ianson wrote: > > On Sunday 03 December 2006 13:11, Sven Arvidsson wrote: > >> On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 20:51 +, Michael Fothergill wrote: > >>> Once it gets to that size would dual layered DVD iso images be > >>> considered to be par

Re: dual layered DVD's vs single layer etc....

2006-12-04 Thread Hugo Vanwoerkom
Alan Ianson wrote: On Sunday 03 December 2006 13:11, Sven Arvidsson wrote: On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 20:51 +, Michael Fothergill wrote: Once it gets to that size would dual layered DVD iso images be considered to be parked in the repositories? Seems like there have been talk about this, but it

Re: dual layered DVD's vs single layer etc....

2006-12-03 Thread Greg Madden
On Sun, 03 Dec 2006 21:08:18 + Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Mike, > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > >Dear Debian people, > > > >This is a pretty dumb question. But I think it has a little merit. > >I bought myself a new Benq DVD rewriter and stuffed in my box.

Re: dual layered DVD's vs single layer etc....

2006-12-03 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hi Mike, In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: >Dear Debian people, > >This is a pretty dumb question. But I think it has a little merit. I >bought myself a new Benq DVD rewriter and stuffed in my box. This one can >handle dual layered DVDs as well as the single ones. > >I then realised a

Re: dual layered DVD's vs single layer etc....

2006-12-03 Thread Alan Ianson
On Sunday 03 December 2006 13:11, Sven Arvidsson wrote: > On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 20:51 +, Michael Fothergill wrote: > > Once it gets to that size would dual layered DVD iso images be considered > > to be parked in the repositories? > > Seems like there have been talk about this, but it haven't h

Re: dual layered DVD's vs single layer etc....

2006-12-03 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Sun, 2006-12-03 at 20:51 +, Michael Fothergill wrote: > Once it gets to that size would dual layered DVD iso images be considered to > be parked in the repositories? Seems like there have been talk about this, but it haven't happened so far. See http://lists.debian.org/debian-cd/2005/07/ms

Re: dual layered DVD's vs single layer etc....

2006-12-03 Thread M-L
On Monday 04 December 2006 07:51, Michael Fothergill sent this for all our perusal: >---> Dear Debian people, >---> >---> This is a pretty dumb question. But I think it has a little merit. I >---> bought myself a new Benq DVD rewriter and stuffed in my box. This one > can ---> handle dual layer