Re: dpkg-architecture

2000-10-18 Thread Colin Watson
"Matthias Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi, i patched my gcc with pgcc for pentium processors. Now my build >architecture is i586. [...] When I last asked about this, I was told to install the pentium-builder package. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: dpkg architecture

1997-01-22 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, Yes, the kernel package rules file does use the dpkg architecture command, which is used to generate the file/distribution name (we have valid architectures listed as i386, m68k, sparc? and alpha, I think, but we do not have 486/586/pentium/686/ppro, (look at stable/unstable binary

Re: dpkg architecture

1997-01-22 Thread Philippe Troin
On Tue, 21 Jan 1997 19:24:03 CST Jesse Goldman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I just noticed that the "dpkg--print-architecture" command gives me back > "i386" while I'd guess, since I have a PPro, it should say "i686". This > is, in fact, what "uname" gives me. Is "i386" used here to mean intel >