Re: don't remove kernel 2.4 or bye-bye ppp, alsa

2004-08-24 Thread John L Fjellstad
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I will consider upgrading the kernel but it may take a while on dialup! I feel your pain, since I'm in your situation. What I do is I downloaded the mainline kernel once and kernel-package package. From there on, I only download the patch for the new ver

Re: don't remove kernel 2.4 or bye-bye ppp, alsa

2004-08-23 Thread Kevin Mark
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:27:03AM +0200, John L Fjellstad wrote: > Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Running 2.6.7 on my server. Make sure that /sys/class/ppp/ppp gets > >> created (it has everything to do with sysfs and not udev actually). > >> > > I run Linux debian 2.6.4-1-386 #

Re: don't remove kernel 2.4 or bye-bye ppp, alsa

2004-08-23 Thread Kevin Mark
On Mon, Aug 23, 2004 at 12:24:10AM +0200, John L Fjellstad wrote: > Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > M ppp c 108 0 > > That's just creating the ppp node manually. Udev should create > automatically without any rules as long as it shows up in the /sys > filesystem. > > -- Hi John, y

Re: don't remove kernel 2.4 or bye-bye ppp, alsa

2004-08-23 Thread John L Fjellstad
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Running 2.6.7 on my server. Make sure that /sys/class/ppp/ppp gets >> created (it has everything to do with sysfs and not udev actually). >> > I run Linux debian 2.6.4-1-386 #1 Sat Mar 13 17:49:12 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux > debian bin. kernel and udev >

Re: don't remove kernel 2.4 or bye-bye ppp, alsa

2004-08-23 Thread John L Fjellstad
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > M ppp c 108 0 That's just creating the ppp node manually. Udev should create automatically without any rules as long as it shows up in the /sys filesystem. -- John L. Fjellstad web: http://www.fjellstad.org/ Quis custodiet ipsos custodes --

Re: don't remove kernel 2.4 or bye-bye ppp, alsa

2004-08-22 Thread Kevin Mark
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 08:29:35AM +0100, Alan Chandler wrote: > On Saturday 21 August 2004 16:58, Kevin Mark wrote: > > I run Linux debian 2.6.4-1-386 #1 Sat Mar 13 17:49:12 EST 2004 i686 > > GNU/Linux debian bin. kernel and udev > > ii udev 0.030-1/dev/ management daemon > > pa

Re: don't remove kernel 2.4 or bye-bye ppp, alsa

2004-08-22 Thread Alan Chandler
On Saturday 21 August 2004 16:58, Kevin Mark wrote: > I run Linux debian 2.6.4-1-386 #1 Sat Mar 13 17:49:12 EST 2004 i686 > GNU/Linux debian bin. kernel and udev > ii udev 0.030-1/dev/ management daemon > package. > I did 'find /sys |grep ppp' and it got: > /sys/cdev/major/ppp >

Re: don't remove kernel 2.4 or bye-bye ppp, alsa

2004-08-21 Thread Kevin Mark
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 02:02:41PM +0200, John L Fjellstad wrote: > Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > this may be unrelated, but I started using 2.6 and recently added UDEV. > > UDEV at the current time does not make a /dev/ppp, so I have to manually > > use MKNOD to create this before

Re: don't remove kernel 2.4 or bye-bye ppp, alsa

2004-08-21 Thread John L Fjellstad
Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > this may be unrelated, but I started using 2.6 and recently added UDEV. > UDEV at the current time does not make a /dev/ppp, so I have to manually > use MKNOD to create this before I can dial with my modem. Which udev version is this, because I use the ori

Re: don't remove kernel 2.4 or bye-bye ppp, alsa

2004-08-15 Thread Dan Jacobson
So we see that something alsa left in /etc/modprobe.d knocked out ppp etc. # pppd ... pppd: This system lacks kernel support for PPP. This could be because the PPP kernel module could not be loaded, or because PPP was not included in the kernel configuration. If PPP was included as a module, tr

Re: don't remove kernel 2.4 or bye-bye ppp, alsa

2004-08-14 Thread Kevin Mark
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 06:28:45AM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote: > Weeks ago I installed and started using kernel 2.6. > As all was well, I decided to > apt-get --purge remove alsa-modules-2.4.26-1-k7 > apt-get --purge remove kernel-image-2.4.26-1-k7 > as I hadn't used them weeks, right. > Well, now I