Hey guys, I know you're trying to drag as many people as possible into
this project, and its great, but maybe there should be a cap on the
cross-posting. I think most of us that are interested either already
have, or will subscribe to debian-doc. Meanwhile, those of us who
already have made the mo
Douglas Allan Tutty said...
> Answering this myself, it seems that wikis are flat in that all pages
> are under the one main wiki, but any page can reference any other page.
It depends on the wiki. I use PmWiki[1], both as a wiki and a
development platform for web apps, and it has a number of
CC'd to debian-user
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 22:34:21 -
marc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Douglas Allan Tutty said...
>
> > If we went with a wiki, we could have one long page for our project
>
> What's the benefit of doing that?
I'm not sure what Doug meant by that, but I was thinking of a main
CC'd to debian-user
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 18:06:13 -0500
Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 05:14:47PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:24:35PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 14:14:43 -0500
> > > > Dougl
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 05:14:47PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:24:35PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 14:14:43 -0500
> > > Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > > So what about novicedoc as a project title?
> > > >
> >
Douglas Allan Tutty said...
> If we went with a wiki, we could have one long page for our project
What's the benefit of doing that?
> with sub-projects as separate chapters. We can follow the same layout
> as a debiandoc e.g. release under GPL, Abstract, TOC, then the chapters.
Chapters are go
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 02:49:00PM -0500, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:24:35PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 14:14:43 -0500
> > Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > So what about novicedoc as a project title?
> > >
> > > I don't
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:24:35PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 14:14:43 -0500
> Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So what about novicedoc as a project title?
> >
> > I don't know what all questions alioth asks when one registers a
> > project, but for a sho
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 14:14:43 -0500
Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 08:51:42PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 13:28:56 -0500
> > Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > I need to look around further at alioth but I _think
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 13:28:56 -0500
Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 08:09:39PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:05:27 -0500
> > Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:46:47AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECT
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 08:09:39PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:05:27 -0500
> Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:46:47AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> We could start a project on alioth. We can setup a repository,
> mailinglist, and
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 11:58:11 -0500
Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As far as these discussions go, we should probably move to debian-doc
> since this discussion isn't about, directly, solving users' problems.
> What say ye? If this seems reasonable, let me know and I'll post this
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 12:05:27 -0500
Douglas Allan Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:46:47AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:16:58AM -0500, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > > If we went with a non-wiki format then we need a home.
> >
> > A h
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:46:47AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:16:58AM -0500, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > If we went with a non-wiki format then we need a home.
>
> A home on which to develop? or a home on which to publish?
> With a distributed revision control
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 03:00:05PM +, Chris Lale wrote:
> Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> >If we were to have a page clearly labled as GPL, would you be able to
> >spit out an html of a wiki page any beter than we could pull off with a
> >browser?
>
> I'm not quite sure what you mean. The wiki pa
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:58:16AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 05:30:10PM -0500, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> > Hi all,
>
> > I have also been subscribed to the debian-doc list which is extremly low
> > volume (probably a symptom of why we're having to have this whole
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 03:28:36PM +, Chris Lale wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I'm in favour of using an open standard for our definitive file
format. The obvious one is docbook, since that is used by other
Debian documentation. We should at l
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 03:28:36PM +, Chris Lale wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >[...]
> >
> >
> >I'm in favour of using an open standard for our definitive file
> >format. The obvious one is docbook, since that is used by other
> >Debian documentation. We should at least confirm to
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 09:16:58AM -0500, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> I'm concerned about the newbiedoc wiki:
> Its server is sometimes unavailable, so we can't get the debian
> www people to add a link.
>
> As a whole its GFDL although we could do our page GPL.
>
> I'm c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I'm in favour of using an open standard for our definitive file
format. The obvious one is docbook, since that is used by other
Debian documentation. We should at least confirm to applicable
international standards. We'd still need a mechanism (preferably
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 05:30:10PM -0500, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We've got lots of ideas flowing. Rather than reponding to each post (I
> was away for one day and there's a lot on this thread), I'll try to
> repond from my perspective to some of the points. In no particular
> o
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
I'm concerned about the newbiedoc wiki:
Its server is sometimes unavailable, so we can't get the debian
www people to add a link.
As a whole its GFDL although we could do our page GPL.
Providing that we are not going to duplicate ef
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 06:16:47AM +, Chris Lale wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 06:19:00PM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
>
Osamu Aoki edits the Debian Reference etc. This is another possible
model for Doug's ideas. Th
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 06:16:47AM +, Chris Lale wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 06:19:00PM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
>
> Osamu Aoki edits the Debian Reference etc. This is another possible
> model for Doug's ideas. There are many contributors but the editor
I'm concerned about the newbiedoc wiki:
Its server is sometimes unavailable, so we can't get the debian
www people to add a link.
As a whole its GFDL although we could do our page GPL.
I'm concerned about the debian wiki:
The front page is immutable due to
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 06:19:00PM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
Sounds like exactly what I had in mind, and seems like a pretty good
battle plan for jumping into the documentation. What format will the
document be written in initially, plain text? I figure if we d
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
[...] as I understand it,
newbiedoc as a whole is unable to change its licence to GPL from GFDL to
make it possible to just migrate it to wiki.debian.org.
Is may not be possible just to merge projects like this. You may find it
easier to work within an existing
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 06:43:08PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 06:19:00PM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
> >
> > Sounds like exactly what I had in mind, and seems like a pretty good
> > battle plan for jumping into the documentation. What format will the
> > document
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 06:19:00PM -0500, Michael Pobega wrote:
>
> Sounds like exactly what I had in mind, and seems like a pretty good
> battle plan for jumping into the documentation. What format will the
> document be written in initially, plain text? I figure if we do plain
> text initially
Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> [...]
>
>
> How does this sound?
>
> Doug.
>
Sounds like exactly what I had in mind, and seems like a pretty good
battle plan for jumping into the documentation. What format will the
document be written in initially, plain text? I figure if we do plain
text initially
30 matches
Mail list logo
