Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:27:54 + Magnus Therning
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:13:51AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:59:08 +0100 Florian Kulzer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
I wo
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 08:47:01AM +1100, Star King of the Grape Trees wrote:
>Magnus Therning wrote:
>
>>On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:39:01AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>>
>>> Where is the list of installed packages kept on
>>>these systems, if I can store a list I can make a script out of it and
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:27:54 +
Magnus Therning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:13:51AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> >On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:59:08 +0100
> >Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Joey Hess wrote:
> >> > Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>I
Magnus Therning wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:39:01AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
Where is the list of installed packages kept on
these systems, if I can store a list I can make a script out of it and
more quickly return to where I was if a cd reinstall is necessary using
that script to
At 1142354731, Thomas Jollans wrote:
> If not, this is a good time to make coffee unless your
> internet connection is based on *insert super fast
> technology that is used by no debian mirror here*
My commercial ISP hosts a debian mirror so I get blazing
speeds at home: and I work at a UK Univ
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 04:39:01AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>First thanks much for the steps for doing this upgrade. So far as I
>can tell, it's not possible to rebuild gnome with all the accessibility
>bits included without first being on an unstable distro first. Second
>the Xwindows interfa
Jude DaShiell wrote:
[...]
Where is the list of installed packages kept on
these systems, if I can store a list I can make a script out of it and
more quickly return to where I was if a cd reinstall is necessary using
that script to download the missing packages? I think
First thanks much for the steps for doing this upgrade. So far as I can
tell, it's not possible to rebuild gnome with all the accessibility bits
included without first being on an unstable distro first. Second the
Xwindows interface once I get it talking may enable multimedia access
conssole
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:13:51AM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:59:08 +0100
>Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Joey Hess wrote:
>> > Florian Kulzer wrote:
>> >
>> >>I would go so far as to say that "Debian Unstable" is an oxymoron.
>> >
>> >
>> > From WordNet
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:45:31 +0100
Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
because SID breakes. period. you must know what yu are doing, how to fix
problems and avoid doing unattended updates or something like that ;)
I'm curious about this. I've bee
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:59:08 +0100
Florian Kulzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joey Hess wrote:
> > Florian Kulzer wrote:
> >
> >>I would go so far as to say that "Debian Unstable" is an oxymoron.
> >
> >
> > From WordNet (r) 2.0 (August 2003) [wn]:
> >
> > unstable
> > ...
> > 6: subj
Joey Hess wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
I would go so far as to say that "Debian Unstable" is an oxymoron.
From WordNet (r) 2.0 (August 2003) [wn]:
unstable
...
6: subject to change; variable; "a fluid situation fraught with
uncertainty"; "everything was unstable following t
Florian Kulzer wrote:
> I would go so far as to say that "Debian Unstable" is an oxymoron.
From WordNet (r) 2.0 (August 2003) [wn]:
unstable
...
6: subject to change; variable; "a fluid situation fraught with
uncertainty"; "everything was unstable following the coup"
[s
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 04:45:31PM +0100, Thomas Jollans wrote:
>On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:39, Magnus Therning wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 05:16:02AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
[..]
>> Step two is to edit /etc/apt/sources.list. This is the relevant part of
>> mine:
>>
>> deb http://ftp.uk
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 14:05:56 -0800
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:27:07 +0200
> Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I think many from this list recalls the yaird issue which made an
> > unbootable initrd. I got "hit" directly :) Though I l
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:27:07 +0200
Andrei Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think many from this list recalls the yaird issue which made an unbootable
> initrd. I got "hit" directly :) Though I learned to *always* keep a second
> kernel installed it still counts as a break.
Good point,
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:42:47 -0800
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:45:31 +0100
> Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > because SID breakes. period. you must know what yu are doing, how to fix
> > problems and avoid doing unattended update
Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> ive been running sid for 4 to 5 years and there have been glitches
> (maybe severe ones once a year), but by-in-large if i want to try new
^^^
The term is actually "by and large" and it is actually a nautical term.
Though, t
Clive Menzies wrote:
On (14/03/06 10:42), Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:45:31 +0100
Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
I'm curious about this. I've been running pure sid for over a year
and have never had anything break .
What is people's experience with
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:42:47AM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:45:31 +0100
> Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > because SID breakes. period. you must know what yu are doing, how to fix
> > problems and avoid doing unattended updates or something
On (14/03/06 10:42), Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:45:31 +0100
> Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > because SID breakes. period. you must know what yu are doing, how to fix
> > problems and avoid doing unattended updates or something like that ;)
>
> I'm curious
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:45:31 +0100
Thomas Jollans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> because SID breakes. period. you must know what yu are doing, how to fix
> problems and avoid doing unattended updates or something like that ;)
I'm curious about this. I've been running pure sid for over a year an
Jude DaShiell wrote:
What would the steps be to go from sarge stable to sarge unstable
using apt-get? For now I'm restricted to console mode until or unless
I figure out how to get debian's xwindows interface talking.
you put two questions. the first is: how to get xwindows working; and 2.
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 11:39, Magnus Therning wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 05:16:02AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> >For now I'm restricted to console mode until or unless I
restricted ? I see no restrictions here. Just a little less eye candy *lol*
>
> First off, Sarge is the stable release
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 05:16:02AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote:
>What would the steps be to go from sarge stable to sarge unstable using
>apt-get? For now I'm restricted to console mode until or unless I
>figure out how to get debian's xwindows interface talking.
First off, Sarge is the stable rel
25 matches
Mail list logo
