> >> > Still I wouldn't think it would take 70 mb, but maybe I'm wrong... :)
> >> It's not only about the kernel image. The whole modules for the new kernel
> >> will be installed into your /lib/modules/2.6.26-2 directory. That will take
> >> much space.
> On 2009-04-17, Daniel Dalton wrote:
> >
On 2009-04-17, Daniel Dalton wrote:
>
> --tsOsTdHNUZQcU9Ye
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
>> > Still I wouldn't think it would take 70 mb, but maybe I'm wrong... :)
>> It's not only about the kernel image. The whole modules for the new kernel
>> will b
> > Still I wouldn't think it would take 70 mb, but maybe I'm wrong... :)
> It's not only about the kernel image. The whole modules for the new kernel
> will be installed into your /lib/modules/2.6.26-2 directory. That will take
> much space.
Ah right, yes I know that, but still didn't think it wa
On 2009-04-17, Daniel Dalton wrote:
>
> --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 07:18:44PM -0700, Luis Maceira wrote:
>>=20
>> apt-get tells me that to dist-upgrade to th
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 07:18:44PM -0700, Luis Maceira wrote:
>
> apt-get tells me that to dist-upgrade to the new linux-image-2.6.26-2
> (lenny5.0.1) an additional of more then 70MB disk space will be used.Why is
> that?
> Doesn't the previous linux image be replaced by the new one,maintaining
>
5 matches
Mail list logo