On 23/01/2012 19:58, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Lu, 23 ian 12, 14:40:40, Nicolas Bercher wrote:
An abandoned project, tra by Russ Cox, was about synchronizing several
computers (N>=2) "the way" unison does for two computers only:
http://swtch.com/tra/
I think, the underlying idea is just gre
On Lu, 23 ian 12, 14:40:40, Nicolas Bercher wrote:
>
> An abandoned project, tra by Russ Cox, was about synchronizing several
> computers (N>=2) "the way" unison does for two computers only:
>
> http://swtch.com/tra/
>
> I think, the underlying idea is just great. Sources are available
> but
Tony van der Hoff a écrit :
On 21/01/12 16:23, Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:55:07 +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
(...)
Whilst this is usable, I can't help but think it's a bit clumsy. Does
anyone know of a replacement for (or addition to) rsync that will
synchronise both ways?
So
On 21/01/12 16:23, Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:55:07 +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
(...)
Whilst this is usable, I can't help but think it's a bit clumsy. Does
anyone know of a replacement for (or addition to) rsync that will
synchronise both ways?
Something like Unison?
That w
On 21/01/12 16:23, Camaleón wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:55:07 +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
(...)
Whilst this is usable, I can't help but think it's a bit clumsy. Does
anyone know of a replacement for (or addition to) rsync that will
synchronise both ways?
Something like Unison?
Someth
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 15:55:07 +, Tony van der Hoff wrote:
(...)
> Whilst this is usable, I can't help but think it's a bit clumsy. Does
> anyone know of a replacement for (or addition to) rsync that will
> synchronise both ways?
Something like Unison?
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBS
6 matches
Mail list logo