On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 11:50:53PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Original Message
> From: Rob Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: df and du disagree, or "How to get 1.1GB of data onto a 650MB CD"
> Date: Fri, 22 S
Original Message
From: T <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Apparently from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: df and du disagree, or "How to get 1.1GB of data onto a 650MB CD"
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:10:19 +0200
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:
Original Message
From: Rob Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: df and du disagree, or "How to get 1.1GB of data onto a 650MB CD"
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:41:09 -0600
>> I also have an empty directory:
>> poota:~# ls -l temp/
&
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 09:14:37 +0100, re2823 wrote:
> I have a strange problem: I have an iso image file which (according to ls)
> is 569M in size:
>
> ...
>
> Now for the problem...
> The relevant line from "df -h":
> poota:~# df -h
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /root/i
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 09:14:37AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I have a strange problem: I have an iso image file which
> (according to ls) is 569M in size:
>
> poota:~# ls -lh image.iso
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 569M 2006-09-12 15:12 image.iso
>
> I also have an empty directory
On 22.09.06 09:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a strange problem: I have an iso image file which
> (according to ls) is 569M in size:
>
> poota:~# ls -lh image.iso
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 569M 2006-09-12 15:12 image.iso
...
> Then I mount the iso, loopback style:
> mount image.iso temp/ -o
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> I do not need to know what is using the missing space but I am intrigued as
> I believe du is correct. There is only the stuff I expected on /dev/hda1
> and it puzzles me to see an extra 500 MB or so missing.
>
> It has been suggested
I do not need to know what is using the missing space but I am intrigued as
I believe du is correct. There is only the stuff I expected on /dev/hda1
and it puzzles me to see an extra 500 MB or so missing.
It has been suggested I try adding stuff until the disk is full for df but
not for du. This
David Wright said:
>
> Bear in mind that du can also seriously underreport usage when run
> as a user because of permissions (whereas df is always right).
Besides files hiding `under' mount points, there is another type of file
that is invisble to du. If a file which is opened by a process is
re
Quoting Patrick Kirk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> df shows my main partiton to have 1.1 Gigs of data
> and du -x shows it to have about 650 MB.
>
> I think du is correct.
I don't. You could try out filling it up as long as you do it as a user,
so that you leave the 5% to prevent the system crashing.
The question is, can I use the 1 Gig or so of unseen space on /dev/hda1?
Patrick
>
> Hi all,
>
> df shows my main partiton to have 1.1 Gigs of data
> and du -x shows it to have about 650 MB.
>
> I think du is correct.
>
> df reads
>
> FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda1 1.9G 1.1G 750M 60% /
> /dev/hda3 15M 1.2M
Just realises that this is a duplicate to a post I sent yesterday but that I
had messed up my exim .forward file. Sorry. My /etc/fstab reads:
#
/dev/hda1 / ext2 defaults,errors=remount-ro 0 1
/dev/hda7none swap sw
13 matches
Mail list logo
