Nick Porter napisał(a):
I'm at a complete loss of how to make this work. The way I understand it
there are three ways to set a default route when the machine boots. 1)
Use DHCP. 2) From the Interfaces file. 3) A script in one of the
if-x.d directorys. I have tried all these and just don't see
225.225.225.0 is not a valid netmask. Your system can't determine if
your gateway and your address are on the same network. Try with
255.255.255.0.
cu.
Nick Porter a écrit :
>I'm at a complete loss of how to make this work. The way I understand it
>there are three ways to set a default route whe
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 01:54:11PM -, Nick Porter wrote:
> # The primary network interface
> auto eth0
>
> iface eth0 inet static
> address 192.168.0.42
> netmask 225.225.225.0
This is wrong : should be 255.255.255.0
Frank
--
"Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first pl
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Karl wrote:
> Hi!
> I have a Debian Sid with PPPoE, using two network cards.
> My problem is, that I have to do a
> "route del default" and then start PPPoE every time I want to connect to
> the net. Does anyone have an idea what I have to do so that the normal
> startup works
Quoting Helge Kreutzmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I had potato on my machine until recently. To upgrade, I took my
> machine to work, edited /etc/networks/interface to use eth0 (instead
> of the ppp-link I ordinary use) and upgraded to woody.
>
> Now at home I want to use the ppp-link again. Unfort
On Sun, Jan 14, 2001 at 08:42:41PM +1100, Matt Chipman wrote:
> Thanks for all the replies everybody, the problem is still there, and
> whatever route i put in /etc/network/interfaces still doesnt apply at boot.
>
> I am thinking maybe i have to have a package installed that makes the route
> stic
Maybe not the most elegent solution but have you thought of puting the
route add command into an rc script.
-Jake
Matt Chipman wrote:
>
> Thanks for all the replies everybody, the problem is still there, and
> whatever route i put in /etc/network/interfaces still doesnt apply at boot.
>
> I am
Thanks for all the replies everybody, the problem is still there, and
whatever route i put in /etc/network/interfaces still doesnt apply at boot.
I am thinking maybe i have to have a package installed that makes the route
stick?? I am using a custom install of potatoe
Is there something route rel
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 11:31:58AM +1100, Matt Chipman wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Just getting used to debian and need to add a default route at boot time. i
> have the route but what file do i need to add it to?
>
> Currently i add it manually after the machine boots.
>
> Lucky its not windows or i'd
* Matt Chipman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Just getting used to debian and need to add a default route at boot time. i
> have the route but what file do i need to add it to?
Add it in /etc/networks/interface ... (man interfaces)
> Currently i add it manually after the machine
That did it!!
I had it all but the "up"
Thanks alot!
Blair
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Armin Joellenbeck wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 06:14:34PM +, Blair M. Cummings wrote:
> > It's not in the same subnet but works when I add a route of .. route add
> > -net 0.0.0.0 netmask 0.0.0.0 dev eth0 m
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 06:14:34PM +, Blair M. Cummings wrote:
> It's not in the same subnet but works when I add a route of .. route add
> -net 0.0.0.0 netmask 0.0.0.0 dev eth0 metric 1.
>
> Thats how I'm able to email you this email (grin)
>
> But I think you are right when it comes to the
It's not in the same subnet but works when I add a route of .. route add
-net 0.0.0.0 netmask 0.0.0.0 dev eth0 metric 1.
Thats how I'm able to email you this email (grin)
But I think you are right when it comes to the interfaces file just asking
for gateway= xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx. I've always had to pu
Ok, Everyone said this works for them and thats cool! But in every example
the gateway was in the same subnet. Question though on somthing I didn't
mention. What if the default gateway is in a different subnet? Would that
make a difference?
My ip is .35 with a 224 mask and the gateway is .17 wit
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 05:55:30PM +, Blair M. Cummings wrote:
> mention. What if the default gateway is in a different subnet? Would that
> make a difference?
gateway has to be on the same subnet, cuz the machine has to know how to get
to that gateway, in order to go elsewhere.
alberto.
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 04:29:47PM +, Blair M. Cummings wrote:
> That is what the interfaces file had in it in both v2.1 and 2.2 It never
> worked for me without adding a full route statement.
>
> On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Alberto Brealey wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 03:52:29PM +, Bla
That is what the interfaces file had in it in both v2.1 and 2.2 It never
worked for me without adding a full route statement.
On Thu, 28 Sep 2000, Alberto Brealey wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 03:52:29PM +, Blair M. Cummings wrote:
> > I hate to write the list about this but I'm not havin
On Thu, Sep 28, 2000 at 03:52:29PM +, Blair M. Cummings wrote:
> I hate to write the list about this but I'm not having much luck with
> keeping a default route after reboot. I was able to keep it with a
try adding "gateway aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd" at the end of the iface section for the
interface wh
18 matches
Mail list logo
