On 2009-02-23 09:41 +0100, Ken Perl wrote:
> What's the reason to choose exim as the default MTA instead of the
> others like courier or postfix, etc?
Mainly historical, I think. Exim has been the default MTA since 1998 or
so, and there are no compelling reasons to switch to another. There is
m
Am 2006-03-12 11:50:08, schrieb Steve Lamb:
> Personally I'd like to see Debian look into using something lighter like
> nullmailer as the default; IE something to satisfy the "forward to a
> smart host" requirement without also requiring a full bore MTA to be
> installed. Those who would nee
Chris Lale said:
> Artem Zolochevskiy wrote:
>> What will be the default MTA in etch? exim, postfix?
> Exim4 on my installation.
Personally I'd like to see Debian look into using something lighter like
nullmailer as the default; IE something to satisfy the "forward to a
smart host" requireme
Artem Zolochevskiy wrote:
hi all
What will be the default MTA in etch? exim, postfix?
--
Artem Zolochevskiy
Exim4 on my installation.
Chris.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On (12/03/06 11:01), Artem Zolochevskiy wrote:
> What will be the default MTA in etch? exim, postfix?
I don't run etch but sarge and sid have exim4 as default; I would guess
etch is the same.
Regards
Clive
--
www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
...strategies for business
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Sat, Nov 21, 1998 at 05:42:46PM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
> The last Debian system I installed (Hamm last week) still had smail
> as its pre-selected MTA.
These kinds of changes are not made to the hamm release - after all,
it is supposed to be /stable/. Slink, ie frozen, has the change, at
On Sat, Nov 21, 1998 at 03:56:20PM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
> The best argument I have seen for removing smail as the default
> Debian MTA
There's no need to advocate the issue any longer. Smail is now
optional and exim is important, ie the default.
Antti-Juhani
--
%%% Antti-Juhani
7 matches
Mail list logo
