> By default it does remove automatically installed packages (but not their
> configurations), see the manual page and [1]. So it's quite possible that
> it did just that on your system.
>
> Next time you do an experiment like that, make sure to set up a suitable
> control group[2] :-)
>
> [1] ht
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:06:03PM +, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> Peter Ludikovsky writes:
>
> > What was the output from aptitude purge? The reason I'm asking is that
> > aptitude usually auto-removes packages where the one removed was the
> > only
Peter Ludikovsky writes:
> What was the output from aptitude purge? The reason I'm asking is that
> aptitude usually auto-removes packages where the one removed was the
> only one with dependencies.
>
> Regards.
> /peter
aptitude said it was just removing , not those packages that were
installed
What was the output from aptitude purge? The reason I'm asking is that
aptitude usually auto-removes packages where the one removed was the
only one with dependencies.
Regards.
/peter
On 12/01/2016 12:26 PM, Rodolfo Medina wrote:
> I did a little experiment with deborphan: first I did: `aptitude
Am Donnerstag, 1. Dezember 2016, 11:49:20 CET schrieb Rodolfo Medina:
> Nicolas George writes:
> > Le primidi 11 frimaire, an CCXXV, Rodolfo Medina a écrit :
> Same result: none of them.
>
> Rodolfo
Try
aptitude purge `deborphan --guess-all`
But look, what is going to be deinstalled. In rare
Nicolas George writes:
> Le primidi 11 frimaire, an CCXXV, Rodolfo Medina a écrit :
>> I did a little experiment with deborphan: first I did: `aptitude install
>> ', and along with it a certain number of other packages were
>> installed. Then I did: `aptitude purge ' followed by `deborphan'
>> b
Le primidi 11 frimaire, an CCXXV, Rodolfo Medina a écrit :
> I did a little experiment with deborphan: first I did: `aptitude install
> ', and along with it a certain number of other packages were
> installed. Then I did: `aptitude purge ' followed by `deborphan' but
> in the output of `deborphan'
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:07:35 -0400 (EDT)
"Robert P. J. Day" wrote:
...
> p.s. starting with a server that had just over 600 packages, i'm now
> down to 460, with no loss in functionality. hopefully, this will make
> that final upgrade as safe as possible.
Just as a miscellaneous reference poi
fslint and cruft are also helpful in keeping a system clean, by
finding out duplicate files, broken links, etc.
--
() ascii-rubanda kampajno - kontraŭ html-a retpoŝto
/\ ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> much thanks to whoever suggested "deborphan" recently to help me
> clean out unused libraries. i've been fairly conservative with it,
> getting rid of libs a bit at a time and making sure things still run.
> p.s. starting with a server that had just over 600 packages,
On Tue,25.Aug.09, 05:00:07, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> the "minimal" part appears to be correct. it's a back-room server,
> ssh-accessible only, no X. i've been removing things to the point
> where i'm now down below 450 packages. i'm a big believer in
> simplicity.
You might want to disable
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, Mark Allums wrote:
> Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > theoretically, i can see that it shouldn't cause any breakage.
> > but i was curious when i noticed that "libhal1" on this etch
> > system is listed as an orphan.
> >
> > coming from a fedora universe, i always thought of
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
theoretically, i can see that it shouldn't cause any breakage. but
i was curious when i noticed that "libhal1" on this etch system is
listed as an orphan.
coming from a fedora universe, i always thought of the HAL layer as
fairly fundamental, but i guess i've stripp
> On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:00 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > On 03.02.07 17:21, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > > Funny, I was under the impression Deborphan was deprecated. Aptitude
> > > supposedly gives you similar functionality.
> >
> > oh, no. I don't like aptitude and still use dselect, I
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:00 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 03.02.07 17:21, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > Funny, I was under the impression Deborphan was deprecated. Aptitude
> > supposedly gives you similar functionality.
>
> oh, no. I don't like aptitude and still use dselect, I hope i won't
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 17:00 +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 03.02.07 17:21, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > Funny, I was under the impression Deborphan was deprecated. Aptitude
> > supposedly gives you similar functionality.
>
> oh, no. I don't like aptitude and still use dselect, I hope i won't
On 03.02.07 17:21, Greg Folkert wrote:
> Funny, I was under the impression Deborphan was deprecated. Aptitude
> supposedly gives you similar functionality.
oh, no. I don't like aptitude and still use dselect, I hope i won't be
pushed into using aptitude ...
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [EMAIL PROT
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 05:01:08PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:21:04AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 05:01:08PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:21:04AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: deborphan
Mail-Followu
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 05:01:08PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:21:04AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> >Subject: Re: deborphan
> >Mai
deborphan | xargs dpkg --purge
On 2/3/07, Gerard Robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
my processor is AMD turion 64 x2 TL50.
dist: etch.
deborphan gives:
libgmp3c2
libpisync0
libopal-2.2.0
libident
libtextwrap1
liblzo2-2
libmagick9
libc6-i386
libieee1284-3
libosp5
libpt-plugins-v4l
libgnom
On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 15:34 +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
> Hello,
> my processor is AMD turion 64 x2 TL50.
> dist: etch.
>
> deborphan gives:
>
> libgmp3c2
> libpisync0
> libopal-2.2.0
> libident
> libtextwrap1
> liblzo2-2
> libmagick9
> libc6-i386
> libieee1284-3
> libosp5
> libpt-plugins-v4l
> li
Gerard Robin wrote:
Hello,
my processor is AMD turion 64 x2 TL50.
dist: etch.
deborphan gives:
and mine gives:
liblzo2-2
libttf-dev
libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2
libdivxdecore0
libsigc++-1.2-5c2
libstdc++5
libgnutls11
libldap-2.3-0
which is funny because I just installed the Sid system from scratch
Gerard Robin schrieb:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:21:04AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: deborphan
Mail-Followup-To: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
On Sat,
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 10:21:04AM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: deborphan
Mail-Followup-To: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 03:3
On (03/02/07 15:34), Gerard Robin wrote:
> Hello,
> my processor is AMD turion 64 x2 TL50.
> dist: etch.
>
> deborphan gives:
>
> libgmp3c2
> libpisync0
> libopal-2.2.0
> libident
> libtextwrap1
> liblzo2-2
> libmagick9
> libc6-i386
> libieee1284-3
> libosp5
> libpt-plugins-v4l
> libgnome-pilot2
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 03:34:10PM +0100, Gerard Robin wrote:
>
> can I remove merely this packages ?
>
That depends. Do you use any of them?
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Marc Shapiro wrote:
> Can I reasonably assume that it is safe to uninstall these packages?
I normally believe in deborphan's output, so I'd say it is. However, if you
want to be sure, just check the rdepends. Most probably you'll see some
package you installed sometime, but then later removed it. I
At 11:23 2000/07/29 -0600, you wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 12:37:04PM +0200, Moritz Schulte wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 07:32:36AM +, Henry White wrote:
> > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kswapd...
> [...]
> > Any ideas or suggestions?
>
> try newer 2.2.17pre's.
I've got th
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 12:37:04PM +0200, Moritz Schulte wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 07:32:36AM +, Henry White wrote:
>
> > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kswapd...
> [...]
> > Any ideas or suggestions?
>
> try newer 2.2.17pre's.
Another data point...
When I installed 2.2.17pr
Hi Henry!
[Henry]
> > > VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kswapd...
> > > Segmentation fault
[me]
> > deborphan prior to 0.1.11-3 had big mem leaks
[Henry]
> No go :-[ Now I'm getting those error messages immediately after the
> fetch. Stopped the process with CTRL-C and tried dpkg --pur
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 07:32:36AM +, Henry White wrote:
> VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kswapd...
[...]
> Any ideas or suggestions?
try newer 2.2.17pre's.
moritz
--
/* Moritz Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* http://hp9001.fh-bielefeld.de/~moritz/
* PGP-Key available, encrypt
On Sat, Jul 29, 2000 at 12:51:41PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Hi Henry!
>
> On Sat, 29 Jul 2000, Henry White wrote:
>
> > After the latest apt-get update/upgrade/check (using sources woody and
> > kernel 2.2.17) when i ran deborphan I got an on screen message
> >
> >VM: do_try_t
Hi Henry!
On Sat, 29 Jul 2000, Henry White wrote:
> After the latest apt-get update/upgrade/check (using sources woody and
> kernel 2.2.17) when i ran deborphan I got an on screen message
>
> VM: do_try_to_free_pages failed for kswapd...
> Segmentation fault
>
> Any ideas or suggesti
34 matches
Mail list logo
