On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 01:41 +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> However, on the web page at
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#Multibooting , under the heading
> "4.8 - Multibooting OpenBSD/i386"
> is
> "Only one of the four primary MBR partitions can be used for booting
> OpenBSD (i.e., extended pa
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Bret Busby wrote:
> On Sun, 3 May 2009, Neal Hogan wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Bret Busby wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 2 May 2009, Neal Hogan wrote:
>>>
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Douglas A. Tutty
wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 0
On Sun, 3 May 2009, Neal Hogan wrote:
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Bret Busby wrote:
On Sat, 2 May 2009, Neal Hogan wrote:
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 06:27:44AM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
FYI - While many of the fBSD folks will tou
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 07:01:39AM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Bret Busby wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 May 2009, Neal Hogan wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> >>> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 06:27:44AM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
> > So, if BSD
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Bret Busby wrote:
> On Sat, 2 May 2009, Neal Hogan wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 06:27:44AM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
>>>
FYI - While many of the fBSD folks will tout there ports/package
>
On Sat, 2 May 2009, Neal Hogan wrote:
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 06:27:44AM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
FYI - While many of the fBSD folks will tout there ports/package
system, I found it to be a pain (especially the upgrade), as did many
ot
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 06:27:44AM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
>
>> FYI - While many of the fBSD folks will tout there ports/package
>> system, I found it to be a pain (especially the upgrade), as did many
>> others. There has recently been so
Well, the thing about FBSD is that it's users are pretty much all
hobbyists, so the length of a manual is a good thing. If Debian had
documentation of equal or greater length I can only see that as a
strength, not a weakness.
If you count folks like Yahoo as hobbyists.
Last time I looked, the
On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 06:27:44AM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
> FYI - While many of the fBSD folks will tout there ports/package
> system, I found it to be a pain (especially the upgrade), as did many
> others. There has recently been some chatter on their general mailing
> list to overhaul how the
On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 3:32 AM, Bret Busby wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Michael Pobega wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 01:12:35PM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Check out the FreeBSD handbook at:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
It is also availabl
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Michael Pobega wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 01:12:35PM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Check out the FreeBSD handbook at:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
It is also available as a pdf which is >1000 pages! It doesn't cover
everything, but it does c
* Miles Fidelman [2009-05-01 09:52:58 -0400]:
> As much as I'm a proponent for good manuals, vs. google... you can
> always add "-ubuntu" to your search query
Good point.
--
Dave
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Paul Johnson wrote:
Osamu Aoki wrote:
I also feel that google tends to rate *.debian.org sites high so you are
likely to see these more than any random blog posts with good reasons
(especially if you have debian in keywords).
I just wish i could get google to stop giving me useless an
On Fri, 1 May 2009 20:55:09 +1200
Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 06:27:03PM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Peace.
> > >
> >
> > I wish for it every day, my friend. You have no idea.
>
> Whereas in a previous post …
>
> > I am serious, and I have access to automatic
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 06:27:03PM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>
>
> > Peace.
> >
>
> I wish for it every day, my friend. You have no idea.
Whereas in a previous post …
> I am serious, and I have access to automatic weapons.
--
Chris.
==
I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe
> Actually, since I hadn't even heard of Zim, I did a "zim linux" google
> Images search and it looks like something I should get acquainted with.
>
Great app with a very active developer who is happy to receive bug
reports and feature requests. Zim has literally changed the way I work
and store
* Paul Johnson [2009-04-30 08:41:14 -0700]:
> If I wanted
> Ubuntu answers, 1) I'd be special in the head to start with
Agreed.
--
Cheers,
Dave
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I also feel that google tends to rate *.debian.org sites high so you are
> likely to see these more than any random blog posts with good reasons
> (especially if you have debian in keywords).
I just wish i could get google to stop giving me useless answers I can't
use revolvin
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:59:01PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mon,27.Apr.09, 10:24:39, H.S. wrote:
>
> > Sure there is, but one has to keep the audience in mind. A beginner or a
> > person just starting to find introductory information regarding current
> > linux distros and related applic
On Mon,27.Apr.09, 10:24:39, H.S. wrote:
> Sure there is, but one has to keep the audience in mind. A beginner or a
> person just starting to find introductory information regarding current
> linux distros and related applications and programs is best served by
> google (the search is very fast an
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 01:39:18PM EDT, Dotan Cohen wrote:
[..]
> > You must be using one of the M$ Windows clones as your "desktop".
> >
>
> KDE 4.2 at the moment, which is acceptably quick. KDE 3.5.10 on the
> same hardware (2 GB RAM, 2 GHz dual core processor, 7200 RPM sata
> drive) was slugg
oops. I wanted this to go to the list. darn gmail :(
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 6:13 AM, David Fox wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Miles Fidelman <
>> It's a reference manual, not a getting started book - and like any reference
>> manual it tries to have everything you might possibly need,
2009/4/27 Paul Johnson :
> Dotan Cohen wrote:
>
>> Maybe you forgot how great of an OS Win98 was at the time.
>
> It wasn't. It was still a 32-bit multitasking hack sitting on top of
> what amounted to a 16-bit version of an 8-bit single-tasking operating
> system with no cohesive security control
Dotan Cohen wrote:
> Maybe you forgot how great of an OS Win98 was at the time.
It wasn't. It was still a 32-bit multitasking hack sitting on top of
what amounted to a 16-bit version of an 8-bit single-tasking operating
system with no cohesive security controls. It was obsolete when it was
stil
> They call it progress. 95% of what I do with my computer is the same as
> what I did on my 486. "Progress" means that I now need a computer a
> thousand times more powerful with five-hundred times more drive space to
> do exactly the same thing.
>
+5 Insightful
> I would be very happy with De
> Especially when the problem is that the computer won't boot, or can't
> get on the internet to run google...
>
Keep a LiveCD handy. It's gotten me at least far enough to Google what
I need at least three times in recent memory.
--
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish.co.il
-
> On a 650Mhz with 384 MiB RAM laptop, Windows 98 was NOT "flying" by any
> stretch of the imagination.. it was.. hmm.. tolerably sluggish. Unless
> you went crazy & started opening windows by the handful, of course.
>
> If you did, MTBF was about two hours.
>
I have seen it run very well on much
> Honestly, I thought Dotan wrote the above in jest and forget the ":-)".
>
> I certainly did not post in earnest.
>
I meant it. Two years ago I had to maintain a Win98 machine that ran
some library software - nothing else, no internet - on 64 MB RAM on a
433 MHz processor. The thing flew. It woul
In <49f5c5dc.8070...@meetinghouse.net>, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>- for Debian, the documentation page (http://debian.org/doc/), lists a
>reference manual (http://debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/), detailed
>maintainer and developer references, and pointers to general Linux
>manuals for Linux Install
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> H.S. wrote:
>> Miles Fidelman wrote:
>>
>>> There's still something awfully useful and compelling about a serious
>>> reference manual, all in one place, with a comprehensive
>>> table-of-contents, detailed index, and embedded references.
>>>
>>
>> Sure there is, but
H.S. wrote:
Miles Fidelman wrote:
There's still something awfully useful and compelling about a serious
reference manual, all in one place, with a comprehensive
table-of-contents, detailed index, and embedded references.
Sure there is, but one has to keep the audience in mind. A beginn
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:10:13AM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> H.S. wrote:
> >Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> >>On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:27:24AM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> >Now a days google is a *huge* help in this.
> >
> There's still something awfully useful and compelling about a serious
Miles Fidelman wrote:
> H.S. wrote:
>> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:27:24AM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>>>
>>>
Document it all you want. But don't expect Joe Toothbrush to read it
all. If one _wants_ go through pages upon pages of docs to create
so
H.S. wrote:
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:27:24AM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Document it all you want. But don't expect Joe Toothbrush to read it
all. If one _wants_ go through pages upon pages of docs to create
something new, that's great and the more the merrier.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:57:40AM -0400, H.S. wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>
> > I'm one to read the 1000 page book cover-to-cover. That way, I'll
> > rememeber a significant amount and know exactly where to look when I
> > need something I don't remember.
>
> Now a days google is a *huge*
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:27:24AM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>
>> Document it all you want. But don't expect Joe Toothbrush to read it
>> all. If one _wants_ go through pages upon pages of docs to create
>> something new, that's great and the more the merrier. But if one
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 11:27:24AM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> Document it all you want. But don't expect Joe Toothbrush to read it
> all. If one _wants_ go through pages upon pages of docs to create
> something new, that's great and the more the merrier. But if one
> _must_ go through the docs t
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 01:10:15PM -0400, JoeHill wrote:
> Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > Maybe you forgot how great of an OS Win98 was at the time.
>
> This has to be a joke. Win 98 wasn't even an operating system. It was an
> application that ran on top of DOS for pete's sake.
>
> > That was a differ
> > Because MS-bashing on a Debian-centric list does wonder for promoting
> > the usage of FOSS software, right?
>
> I'm not promoting anything.
>
> A bit of anti-M$ trolling is always fun and could get the party going.
>
> :-)
I was a Windows admin for a number of years, that company drove me
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 04:31:17AM EDT, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> >> I don't know about their more recent consumer-grade offering but
> >> you may want to take a look at Windows '98. When I got the laptop,
> >> it came with a 20-page or so manual. But then considering the
> >> "capabilities" of the OS
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 01:12:03AM EDT, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Chris Jones wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 06:12:35AM EDT, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> >>> Check out the FreeBSD handbook at:
> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
> >>> It is also available as a pdf which is >10
Dotan Cohen wrote:
> >> I don't know about their more recent consumer-grade offering but you may
> >> want to take a look at Windows '98. When I got the laptop, it came with
> >> a 20-page or so manual. But then considering the "capabilities" of the
> >> OS that was probably overkill anyway.
>
Paul Johnson wrote:
Chris Jones wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 06:12:35AM EDT, Dotan Cohen wrote:
Check out the FreeBSD handbook at:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
It is also available as a pdf which is >1000 pages! It doesn't cover
everything, but it does
>> I don't know about their more recent consumer-grade offering but you may
>> want to take a look at Windows '98. When I got the laptop, it came with
>> a 20-page or so manual. But then considering the "capabilities" of the
>> OS that was probably overkill anyway.
>
> That wrongly assumes anything
>> That sounds more like a problem than a solution. I would not try an OS
>> that had a 1000 page manual. I want simple, not comprehensive.
>
> Then you'd better give up computers. It takes more than 1000 pages to
> properly document any operating system. Try "ls /usr/share/man/* | wc".
>
Docume
In <87zle4497u@thumper.dhh.gt.org>, John Hasler wrote:
>Dotan Cohen wrote:
>> That sounds more like a problem than a solution. I would not try an OS
>> that had a 1000 page manual. I want simple, not comprehensive.
>
>Then you'd better give up computers. It takes more than 1000 pages to
>prope
Dotan Cohen wrote:
>> Check out the FreeBSD handbook at:
>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
>> It is also available as a pdf which is >1000 pages! It doesn't cover
>> everything, but it does cover a lot. They also have other books and
>> articles at http://www.freebsd.
Chris Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 06:12:35AM EDT, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>>> Check out the FreeBSD handbook at:
>>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
>>> It is also available as a pdf which is >1000 pages! It doesn't cover
>>> everything, but it does cover a lot.
Steve Kemp wrote at 2009-04-24 09:08 -0500:
> Were my site not already present I'd not start it now - instead I'd
> post to the wiki, or other sites. (The wiki is nice, but it isn't
> a perfect medium because people cannot post questions, leave comments,
> etc. I do think that "forum-like" s
Dotan Cohen wrote:
> That sounds more like a problem than a solution. I would not try an OS
> that had a 1000 page manual. I want simple, not comprehensive.
Then you'd better give up computers. It takes more than 1000 pages to
properly document any operating system. Try "ls /usr/share/man/* | wc
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 06:12:35AM EDT, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > Check out the FreeBSD handbook at:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
> > It is also available as a pdf which is >1000 pages! It doesn't cover
> > everything, but it does cover a lot. They also have other
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Andrei Popescu
wrote:
> On Thu,23.Apr.09, 00:13:54, Javier Barroso wrote:
>
>> It would be awesome seeing all the questions asked here (in this list)
>> solved with a pointer to our wiki (this would mean there would be a
>> team which extracts resume from the l
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 01:12:35PM +0300, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> > Check out the FreeBSD handbook at:
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
> > It is also available as a pdf which is >1000 pages! It doesn't cover
> > everything, but it does cover a lot. They also have othe
On Thu,23.Apr.09, 00:13:54, Javier Barroso wrote:
> It would be awesome seeing all the questions asked here (in this list)
> solved with a pointer to our wiki (this would mean there would be a
> team which extracts resume from the list and put conclusions in the
> wiki, but sure nobody has time fo
> Check out the FreeBSD handbook at:
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/
> It is also available as a pdf which is >1000 pages! It doesn't cover
> everything, but it does cover a lot. They also have other books and
> articles at http://www.freebsd.org/docs/books.html.
>
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 01:27:32PM EDT, Carl Johnson wrote:
> "H.S." writes:
>
> > Michael Pobega wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 07:43:55AM -0400, machiner wrote:
> >>> I thought I asked you a question.
> >>>
> >>
> >> There's no reason to be rude. All we're saying is that instead of
> >> r
"H.S." writes:
> Michael Pobega wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 07:43:55AM -0400, machiner wrote:
>>> I thought I asked you a question.
>>>
>>
>> There's no reason to be rude. All we're saying is that instead of
>> running your own site, why not contribute to a pre-existing site? I'm
>> person
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:13:54AM +0200, Javier Barroso wrote:
> www.debian.org/usr/share/doc/ or usr.share.doc.debian.org/ where you
> could find all docs from debian packages. It would be nice (I think)
aptitude install dwww
Now look at http://localhost/dwww
A site providing that to all pack
On Fri Apr 24, 2009 at 08:14:52 -0400, machiner wrote:
> This list is not exclusive to developers. Many people read it. Sure, I'd
> love a
> dev or 2, and I clearly asked, to contribute to the site. Why wouldn't I?
> But, I'd
> be just as happy, and I think the community the site serves woul
> Indeed. The Gentoo documentation is the best that I have ever seen as well.
>
I think that you could leverage this. _Don't_ be a documentation site.
Find some other Debian information to specialize in, such as CLI
humour, comparisons between the "Debian Way" and the
"Ubuntu/Fedora/Gentoo/* Way"
Reply to: hs.sa...@gmail.com
Original Message Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:25:39 -0400
RE: Re: debiantutorials.org seeks input and new blood [See Original Message
Below]
Indeed. The Gentoo documentation is the best that I have ever seen as well.
-
On Fri
Reply to: pob...@fuzzydev.org
Original Message Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:08:29 -0400
RE: Re: debiantutorials.org seeks input and new blood [See Original Message
Below]
You misunderstand me. Hearing people say that they would rather contribute to
another source, esp one where they may have an
Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 07:43:55AM -0400, machiner wrote:
>> I thought I asked you a question.
>>
>
> There's no reason to be rude. All we're saying is that instead of
> running your own site, why not contribute to a pre-existing site? I'm
> personally hoping that one day I
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 07:43:55AM -0400, machiner wrote:
>
> I thought I asked you a question.
>
There's no reason to be rude. All we're saying is that instead of
running your own site, why not contribute to a pre-existing site? I'm
personally hoping that one day I can say that Debian's Wiki tr
Reply to: a...@c2i.net
Original Message Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:13:28 +0200
RE: Re: debiantutorials.org seeks input and new blood [See Original Message
Below]
I thought I asked you a question.
-
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:13:28 +0200 a...@c2i.net wrote
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:40:11 -0400, machiner wrote in message
<20090422174011.4719e...@lapbox>:
> I'm laughing as I write thisOh my.
..once you're done, Javier Barroso has an excellent proposal. ;o)
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:45:43PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>> On Tue,21.Apr.09, 08:58:13, machiner wrote:
>>
>> > Recently I set up a blog for a couple site members and one older
>> > fellow in particular is going gang-busters! I would
Reply to: a...@c2i.net
Original Message Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:42:04 +0200
RE: Re: debiantutorials.org seeks input and new blood [See Original Message
Below]
AYKM?
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.howtoforge.com&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=Inline
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:22:29 +0300, Dotan wrote in message
<880dece00904212322r17423bees4ef602e95f033...@mail.gmail.com>:
> > debiantutorials.org is 4 years old, the "blog" aspect is new for
> > new Debian users to write about their experiences.
>
> The site may have been available, but it was u
On Wednesday 22 April 2009 04:01:57 H.S. wrote:
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > If you are seeking help, it might be worth supplying a URL. The truth of
> > your
>
> Isn't that in the subject line? Or am I missing something here?
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Please reply to this list only. I read this list on its cor
> debiantutorials.org is 4 years old, the "blog" aspect is new for new Debian
> users to
> write about their experiences.
The site may have been available, but it was unknown until now.
> I'm hearing a lot that the web is already saturated with Debian
> documentation, and
> you may be right.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 20:01, H.S. wrote:
> Lisi Reisz wrote:
>>
>> If you are seeking help, it might be worth supplying a URL. The truth of
>> your
>
> Isn't that in the subject line? Or am I missing something here?
In gmail in particular, it can be easy to miss the subject line once you
clic
Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> If you are seeking help, it might be worth supplying a URL. The truth of
> your
Isn't that in the subject line? Or am I missing something here?
--
Please reply to this list only. I read this list on its corresponding
newsgroup on gmane.org. Replies sent to my email
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 08:24:59PM EDT, machiner wrote:
> Reply to: cjns1...@gmail.com
> Original Message Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:45:33 -0400
> RE: Re: debiantutorials.org seeks input and new blood [See Original Message
> Below]
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:45:33 -0400 cjns1...@
Reply to: cjns1...@gmail.com
Original Message Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:45:33 -0400
RE: Re: debiantutorials.org seeks input and new blood [See Original Message
Below]
-
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:45:33 -0400 cjns1...@gmail.com wrote:
>On Tue, Apr
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 01:52:05PM EDT, Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:45:43PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Tue,21.Apr.09, 08:58:13, machiner wrote:
> > > Recently I set up a blog for a couple site members and one older
> > > fellow in particular is going gang-busters!
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 05:45:43PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Tue,21.Apr.09, 08:58:13, machiner wrote:
>
> > Recently I set up a blog for a couple site members and one older
> > fellow in particular is going gang-busters! I would like to expand
> > the site to include any of you that can
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 13:58:13 machiner wrote:
> I seek recommendations for improving the site as well as new authors,
> whether one article or many. Please consider it. The site does very well
> in the search engines and it could use some new blood. I would be
> thrilled, as would the site's
> In a way the OP is spamming the list, but really ...
> Is is etiquette to be so nasty about it?
>
No, it is not etiquette to be nasty. I was helpful and gave him my
suggestions, and further refined ideas with the OP off list. But I do
not want other list members to say "hey, Brian got away with
In a way the OP is spamming the list, but really ...
Is is etiquette to be so nasty about it?
He is clearly a private citizen with a desire to comtribute. That his
attempts fall short of your standards, merely indicates that his request
is justified. I also find a dynamically changing clock a vis
Reply to: andreimpope...@gmail.com
Original Message Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:45:43 +0300
RE: Re: debiantutorials.org seeks input and new blood [See Original Message
Below]
Fair enough. Thank you for your reply.
--machiner
-
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:45
On Tue,21.Apr.09, 08:58:13, machiner wrote:
> Recently I set up a blog for a couple site members and one older fellow in
> particular
> is going gang-busters! I would like to expand the site to include any of you
> that
> can muster up an hour a week or so to write tutorials or articles germai
> I seek recommendations for improving the site
1) Under the site name there is not one, but _two_ corny taglines. Get
rid of them until you find a single tagline that is witty and on
topic.
2) "Maybe I should have the site translated to Australian"? What is
that? Maybe you should, but I as a vis
83 matches
Mail list logo
